Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frédéric Nivor

dblp:53/5075 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Transport protocols and congestion control · 56% Content delivery and video streaming · 44%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transport protocols and congestion control › transport protocols
DCCP
0.112005
Experimental study of DCCP for multimedia applications · CoNEXT 2005
Transport protocols and congestion control › equation-based rate control
TCP-friendly rate control
0.012005
Experimental study of DCCP for multimedia applications · CoNEXT 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

experimental study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Experimental study of DCCP for multimedia applications
abstract
The Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) [1] is being proposed by IETF as a transport protocol to support multimedia traffic. Two congestion controls mechanisms have been proposed so far for DCCP, namely TCP-Like [2] and TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC) [3]. In this paper, we experimentally investigate the DCCP performance with its two congestion control algorithms for two kinds of video streaming applications, those using XVID [4] and MPEG [5] codecs. The first stream want to make quick use of any available bandwidth, while the second prefer to minimize abrupt changes in the sending rate. Our results confirm these preferences for each stream regard to DCCP congestion controls.
Frédéric Nivor
CoNEXT1