EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniela Fera
dblp:53/5455
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics › nucleic acid structure analysis
RNA structural bioinformatics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAG: RNA-As-Graphs database-concepts, analysis, features · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
molecular graph representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAG: RNA-As-Graphs database-concepts, analysis, features · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
topological complexity ranking · 0.0graph enumeration · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | RAG: RNA-As-Graphs database-concepts, analysis, featuresabstractMOTIVATION: Understanding RNA's structural diversity is vital for identifying novel RNA structures and pursuing RNA genomics initiatives. By classifying RNA secondary motifs based on correlations between conserved RNA secondary structures and functional properties, we offer an avenue for predicting novel motifs. Although several RNA databases exist, no comprehensive schemes are available for cataloguing the range and diversity of RNA's structural repertoire. RESULTS: Our RNA-As-Graphs (RAG) database describes and ranks all mathematically possible (including existing and candidate) RNA secondary motifs on the basis of graphical enumeration techniques. We represent RNA secondary structures as two-dimensional graphs (networks), specifying the connectivity between RNA secondary structural elements, such as loops, bulges, stems and junctions. We archive RNA tree motifs as 'tree graphs' and other RNAs, including pseudoknots, as general 'dual graphs'. All RNA motifs are catalogued by graph vertex number (a measure of sequence length) and ranked by topological complexity. The RAG inventory immediately suggests candidates for novel RNA motifs, either naturally occurring or synthetic, and thereby might stimulate the prediction and design of novel RNA motifs. AVAILABILITY: The database is accessible on the web at http://monod.biomath.nyu.edu/rna Hin Hark Gan, Daniela Fera, Julie Zorn, Nahum Shiffeldrim, Michael Tang, Uri Laserson, Namhee Kim, Tamar Schlick |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2004 | RAG: RNA-As-Graphs web resourceabstractBACKGROUND: The proliferation of structural and functional studies of RNA has revealed an increasing range of RNA's structural repertoire. Toward the objective of systematic cataloguing of RNA's structural repertoire, we have recently described the basis of a graphical approach for organizing RNA secondary structures, including existing and hypothetical motifs. DESCRIPTION: We now present an RNA motif database based on graph theory, termed RAG for RNA-As-Graphs, to catalogue and rank all theoretically possible, including existing, candidate and hypothetical, RNA secondary motifs. The candidate motifs are predicted using a clustering algorithm that classifies RNA graphs into RNA-like and non-RNA groups. All RNA motifs are filed according to their graph vertex number (RNA length) and ranked by topological complexity. CONCLUSIONS: RAG's quantitative cataloguing allows facile retrieval of all classes of RNA secondary motifs, assists identification of structural and functional properties of user-supplied RNA sequences, and helps stimulate the search for novel RNAs based on predicted candidate motifs. Daniela Fera, Namhee Kim, Nahum Shiffeldrim, Julie Zorn, Uri Laserson, Hin Hark Gan, Tamar Schlick |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |