Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ron Obermarck
dblp:53/6002
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transaction processing and concurrency control
recovery |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Algorithms for the Management of Remote Backup Data Bases for Disaster Recovery · ICDE 1993 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › failure recovery
disaster recovery |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Algorithms for the Management of Remote Backup Data Bases for Disaster Recovery · ICDE 1993 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Algorithms for the Management of Remote Backup Data Bases for Disaster Recovery · ICDE 1993 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
deadlock detection |
0.0 | 2 | 1982 | Distributed Deadlock Detection Algorithm · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1982 A Resource Class Independent Deadlock Detection Algorithm · VLDB 1981 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
distributed commit protocols |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Transaction Management in the R* Distributed Database Management System · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1986 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control › distributed commit protocols
two-phase commit |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Transaction Management in the R* Distributed Database Management System · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1986 |
Distributed systems › concurrency control › deadlock detection
distributed deadlock detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Transaction Management in the R* Distributed Database Management System · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1986 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control › recovery
ARIES recovery |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Algorithms for the Management of Remote Backup Data Bases for Disaster Recovery · ICDE 1993 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control › deadlock detection
distributed deadlock detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Distributed Deadlock Detection Algorithm · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1982 |
Distributed systems
distributed coordination |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Distributed Deadlock Detection Algorithm · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1982 |
Distributed systems
distributed database |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Distributed Deadlock Detection Algorithm · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1982 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
concurrency control |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | Distributed Deadlock Detection Algorithm · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1982 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
distributed transaction management |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | A Resource Class Independent Deadlock Detection Algorithm · VLDB 1981 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
log analysis · 0.0checkpointing · 0.0buffer management · 0.0commit protocol optimization · 0.0distributed algorithm · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Algorithms for the Management of Remote Backup Data Bases for Disaster RecoveryabstractA method for managing a remote backup database to provide protection from disasters that destroy the primary database is presented. The method is general enough to accommodate the ARIES-type recovery and concurrency control methods as well as the methods used by other systems such as DB2, DL/I and IMS Fast Path. It provides high performance by exploiting parallelism and by reducing inputs and outputs using different means, like log analysis and choosing a different buffer management policy from the primary one. Techniques are proposed for checkpointing the state of the backup system so that recovery can be performed quickly in case the backup system fails, and for allowing new transaction activity to begin even as the backup is taking over a primary failure. Some performance measurements taken from a prototype are also presented.> C. Mohan 0001, Kent Treiber, Ron Obermarck |
ICDE | 3 |
| 1986 | Transaction Management in the R* Distributed Database Management SystemabstractThis paper deals with the transaction management aspects of the R* distributed database system. It concentrates primarily on the description of the R * commit protocols, Presumed Abort (PA) and Presumed Commit (PC). PA and PC are extensions of the well-known, two-phase (2P) commit protocol. PA is optimized for read-only transactions and a class of multisite update transactions, and PC is optimized for other classes of multisite update transactions. The optimizations result in reduced intersite message traffic and log writes, and, consequently, a better response time. The paper also discusses R * 's approach toward distributed deadlock detection and resolution. C. Mohan 0001, Bruce G. Lindsay 0001, Ron Obermarck |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 3 |
| 1982 | Distributed Deadlock Detection AlgorithmabstractWe propose an algorithm for detecting deadlocks among transactions running concurrently in a distributed processing network (i.e., a distributed database system). The proposed algorithm is a distributed deadlock detection algorithm. A proof of the correctness of the distributed portion of the algorithm is given, followed by an example of the algorithm in operation. The performance characteristics of the algorithm are also presented. Ron Obermarck |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 1 |
| 1981 | A Resource Class Independent Deadlock Detection Algorithm
Catriel Beeri, Ron Obermarck |
VLDB | 2 |