Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kenneth Wilder

dblp:53/6155 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 67% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
decision tree classifiers
0.011997
Joint Induction of Shape Features and Tree Classifiers · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape features
0.011997
Joint Induction of Shape Features and Tree Classifiers · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
shape recognition
0.011997
Joint Induction of Shape Features and Tree Classifiers · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomization · 0.0inductive learning · 0.0ensemble aggregation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Applying WebTables in Practice
Sreeram Balakrishnan, Alon Y. Halevy, Boulos Harb, Hongrae Lee, Jayant Madhavan, Afshin Rostamizadeh, Warren Shen, Kenneth Wilder, Fei Wu 0003, Cong Yu 0001
CIDR8
2005 Towards a self-stopping evolutionary algorithm using coupling from the past
abstract
In this paper a stopping criterion for a particular class of evolutionary algorithms is devised. First, a model of a generic evolutionary algorithm using iterated random maps is presented. The model allows the exploration of a connection between coupling from the past, and a stopping criterion for evolutionary algorithms. Accordingly, a method to stop a generic evolutionary algorithm is proposed. Some computational experiments are carried out to test the stopping criterion, using a modified version of coupling from the past. Empirical evidence is shown to support the suitability of the criterion.
Germán Jairo Hernández, Kenneth Wilder, Fernando Niño, Julian Garcia
GECCO2
1997 Joint Induction of Shape Features and Tree Classifiers
abstract
We introduce a very large family of binary features for two-dimensional shapes. The salient ones for separating particular shapes are determined by inductive learning during the construction of classification trees. There is a feature for every possible geometric arrangement of local topographic codes. The arrangements express coarse constraints on relative angles and distances among the code locations and are nearly invariant to substantial affine and nonlinear deformations. They are also partially ordered, which makes it possible to narrow the search for informative ones at each node of the tree. Different trees correspond to different aspects of shape. They are statistically and weakly dependent due to randomization and are aggregated in a simple way. Adapting the algorithm to a shape family is then fully automatic once training samples are provided. As an illustration, we classified handwritten digits from the NIST database; the error rate was 0.7 percent.
Yali Amit, Kenneth Wilder
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2