Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
J. M. Deutsch
dblp:53/6533
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Evolutionary algorithms for finding optimal gene sets in microarray prediction · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Evolutionary algorithms for finding optimal gene sets in microarray prediction · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Evolutionary algorithms for finding optimal gene sets in microarray prediction · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression classification
microarray classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Evolutionary algorithms for finding optimal gene sets in microarray prediction · Bioinform. 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
evolutionary algorithm · 0.0ensemble of predictors · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Evolutionary algorithms for finding optimal gene sets in microarray predictionabstractMOTIVATION: Microarray data has been shown recently to be efficacious in distinguishing closely related cell types that often appear in different forms of cancer, but is not yet practical clinically. However, the data might be used to construct a minimal set of marker genes that could then be used clinically by making antibody assays to diagnose a specific type of cancer. Here a replication algorithm is used for this purpose. It evolves an ensemble of predictors, all using different combinations of genes to generate a set of optimal predictors. RESULTS: We apply this method to the leukemia data of the Whitehead/MIT group that attempts to differentially diagnose two kinds of leukemia, and also to data of Khan et al. to distinguish four different kinds of childhood cancers. In the latter case we were able to reduce the number of genes needed from 96 to less than 15, while at the same time being able to classify all of their test data perfectly. We also apply this method to two other cases, Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma data (Shipp et al., 2002), and data of Ramaswamy et al. on multiclass diagnosis of 14 common tumor types. AVAILABILITY: http://stravinsky.ucsc.edu/josh/gesses/. J. M. Deutsch |
Bioinform. | 1 |