EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
S. Rahimi
dblp:53/6914
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet architecture and protocols · 40% Wireless networking · 20% Network management and operations · 20% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols
local area network |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983 |
Wireless networking
medium access control |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983 |
Network management and operations › protocol verification
protocol validation |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983 |
Internet architecture and protocols › local area network
token bus |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0behavioral assertions · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1983 | LAN Protocol Validation and EvaluationabstractWe are using simulation to validate and evaluate the performance of the proposed IEEE 802.4 Token-Passing Bus Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocol for local area networks. We will use our discussion of this modeling study to present our technique for protocol validation. We will also present some of our validation and performance results. Our modeling technique is unusual in two important respects. First, it transforms the formal specification of the protocol by a direct and simple technique into a simulation program. Second, testable assertions about the protocors expected behavior, under both normal and abnormal conditions, are easily transformed into simulation test cases. Our protocol validation technique runs test cases on the simulation model. These test cases are based upon "behavioral assertions" which were derived from the design objectives and expected use of the protocol. Our validation results are discussed in terms of the behavioral assertions tested and the success or failure of meeting these assertions. We also report on simulation performance predictions for some special test cases. S. Rahimi, George Jelatis |
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. | 1 |