Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

S. Rahimi

dblp:53/6914 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 40% Wireless networking · 20% Network management and operations · 20%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols
local area network
0.011983
LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983
Wireless networking
medium access control
0.011983
LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983
Network management and operations › protocol verification
protocol validation
0.011983
LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983
Internet architecture and protocols › local area network
token bus
0.011983
LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0behavioral assertions · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 LAN Protocol Validation and Evaluation
abstract
We are using simulation to validate and evaluate the performance of the proposed IEEE 802.4 Token-Passing Bus Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocol for local area networks. We will use our discussion of this modeling study to present our technique for protocol validation. We will also present some of our validation and performance results. Our modeling technique is unusual in two important respects. First, it transforms the formal specification of the protocol by a direct and simple technique into a simulation program. Second, testable assertions about the protocors expected behavior, under both normal and abnormal conditions, are easily transformed into simulation test cases. Our protocol validation technique runs test cases on the simulation model. These test cases are based upon "behavioral assertions" which were derived from the design objectives and expected use of the protocol. Our validation results are discussed in terms of the behavioral assertions tested and the success or failure of meeting these assertions. We also report on simulation performance predictions for some special test cases.
S. Rahimi, George Jelatis
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1