Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Triller

dblp:53/7871 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 73% Malware analysis · 27%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Malware analysis
android malware
0.312017
Making malory behave maliciously: targeted fuzzing of android execution environments · ICSE 2017
Systems and software security
exploitation
0.212016
An In-Depth Study of More Than Ten Years of Java Exploitation · CCS 2016
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.212016
An In-Depth Study of More Than Ten Years of Java Exploitation · CCS 2016
Software testing
fuzzing
0.112017
Making malory behave maliciously: targeted fuzzing of android execution environments · ICSE 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.6search-based algorithm · 0.6dynamic analysis · 0.6empirical study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Making malory behave maliciously: targeted fuzzing of android execution environments
abstract
Android applications, or apps, provide useful features to end-users, but many apps also contain malicious behavior. Modern malware makes understanding such behavior challenging by behaving maliciously only under particular conditions. For example, a malware app may check whether it runs on a real device and not an emulator, in a particular country, and alongside a specific target app, such as a vulnerable banking app. To observe the malicious behavior, a security analyst must find out and emulate all these app-specific constraints. This paper presents FuzzDroid, a framework for automatically generating an Android execution environment where an app exposes its malicious behavior. The key idea is to combine an extensible set of static and dynamic analyses through a search-based algorithm that steers the app toward a configurable target location. On recent malware, the approach reaches the target location in 75% of the apps. In total, we reach 240 code locations within an average time of only one minute. To reach these code locations, FuzzDroid generates 106 different environments, too many for a human analyst to create manually.
Siegfried Rasthofer, Steven Arzt, Stefan Triller, Michael Pradel
ICSE3
2016 An In-Depth Study of More Than Ten Years of Java Exploitation
abstract
When created, the Java platform was among the first runtimes designed with security in mind. Yet, numerous Java versions were shown to contain far-reaching vulnerabilities, permitting denial-of-service attacks or even worse allowing intruders to bypass the runtime's sandbox mechanisms, opening the host system up to many kinds of further attacks.
Philipp Holzinger, Stefan Triller, Alexandre Bartel, Eric Bodden
CCS2
2010 Towards a Comprehensive Teamwork Model for Highly Dynamic Domains
Hendrik Skubch, Michael Wagner 0001, Roland Reichle, Stefan Triller, Kurt Geihs
ICAART (2)4