Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Rhys Gwynllyw

dblp:53/9066 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 62% Empirical software engineering · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › object-oriented analysis and design
object-oriented design
0.112010
Interactive, Evolutionary Search in Upstream Object-Oriented Class Design · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2010
Empirical software engineering › AI for software engineering
search-based software engineering
0.112010
Interactive, Evolutionary Search in Upstream Object-Oriented Class Design · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2010
Requirements engineering and software design › software design principles
coupling and cohesion
0.012010
Interactive, Evolutionary Search in Upstream Object-Oriented Class Design · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2010
Requirements engineering and software design
software design quality
0.012010
Interactive, Evolutionary Search in Upstream Object-Oriented Class Design · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

software agents · 0.1interactive search · 0.1evolutionary computation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Interactive, Evolutionary Search in Upstream Object-Oriented Class Design
abstract
Although much evidence exists to suggest that early life cycle software engineering design is a difficult task for software engineers to perform, current computational tool support for software engineers is limited. To address this limitation, interactive search-based approaches using evolutionary computation and software agents are investigated in experimental upstream design episodes for two example design domains. Results show that interactive evolutionary search, supported by software agents, appears highly promising. As an open system, search is steered jointly by designer preferences and software agents. Directly traceable to the design problem domain, a mass of useful and interesting class designs is arrived at which may be visualized by the designer with quantitative measures of structural integrity, such as design coupling and class cohesion. The class designs are found to be of equivalent or better coupling and cohesion when compared to a manual class design for the example design domains, and by exploiting concurrent execution, the runtime performance of the software agents is highly favorable.
Christopher L. Simons, Ian C. Parmee, Rhys Gwynllyw
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3