Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthias Kaschube

dblp:53/919 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5145-7487ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 72% Trustworthy machine learning · 28%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
neural representation analysis
0.912025
Dimensionality Mismatch Between Brains and Artificial Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
representation geometry
0.912025
Dimensionality Mismatch Between Brains and Artificial Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.912025
Dimensionality Mismatch Between Brains and Artificial Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
feature visualization
0.812024
Linking in Style: Understanding Learned Features in Deep Learning Models · ECCV (85) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear dimensionality · 1.7linear dimensionality · 1.7fMRI · 1.7style transfer · 0.8feature visualization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Dimensionality Mismatch Between Brains and Artificial Neural Networks
abstract
Biological and artificial vision systems both rely on hierarchical architectures, yet it remains unclear how their representational geometry evolves across processing stages, and what functional consequences may arise from potential differences. In this work, we systematically quantify and compare the linear and nonlinear dimensionality of human brain activity (fMRI) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) during natural image viewing. In the human ventral visual stream, both dimensionality measures increase along the visual hierarchy, supporting the emergence of semantic and abstract representations. For linear dimensionality, most ANNs show a similar increase, but only for pooled features, emphasizing the importance of appropriate feature readouts in brain–model comparisons. In contrast, nonlinear dimensionality shows a collapse in the later layers of ANNs, pointing at a mismatch in representational geometry between the human and artificial visual systems. This mismatch may have functional consequences: while high-dimensional brain representations support flexible generalization to abstract features, ANNs appear to lose this capacity in later layers, where their representations become overly compressed. Overall, our findings propose dimensionality alignment as a benchmark for building more flexible and biologically grounded vision models.
Santiago Galella, Maren H. Wehrheim, Matthias Kaschube
NeurIPS3
2025 Denoising Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Microscopy Image Restoration
abstract
Advances in microscopy imaging enable researchers to visualize structures at the nanoscale level thereby unraveling intricate details of biological organization. However, challenges such as image noise, photobleaching of fluo-rophores, and low tolerability of biological samples to high light doses remain, restricting temporal resolutions and experiment durations. Reduced laser doses enable longer measurements at the cost of lower resolution and increased noise, which hinders accurate downstream analyses. Here we train a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) to predict high-resolution images by conditioning the model on low-resolution information. Additionally, the probabilistic aspect of the DDPM allows for repeated generation of images that tend to further increase the signal-to-noise ratio. We show that our model achieves a performance that is better or similar to the previously best-performing methods, across four highly diverse datasets. Importantly, while any of the previous methods show competitive performance for some, but not all datasets, our method consistently achieves high performance across all four data sets, suggesting high generalizability. Our code and datasets are available at https://githubcom/kaschube-lab/ddpm_highres_microscopy, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14178277, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14215837.
Pamela Osuna-Vargas, Maren H. Wehrheim, Lucas Zinz, Johanna V. Rahm, Ashwin Balakrishnan, Alexandra Kaminer, Mike Heilemann, Matthias Kaschube
WACV8
2024 Linking in Style: Understanding Learned Features in Deep Learning Models
Maren H. Wehrheim, Pamela Osuna-Vargas, Matthias Kaschube
ECCV (85)3
2012 Coordinated Optimization of Visual Cortical Maps (I) Symmetry-based Analysis
abstract
In the primary visual cortex of primates and carnivores, functional architecture can be characterized by maps of various stimulus features such as orientation preference (OP), ocular dominance (OD), and spatial frequency. It is a long-standing question in theoretical neuroscience whether the observed maps should be interpreted as optima of a specific energy functional that summarizes the design principles of cortical functional architecture. A rigorous evaluation of this optimization hypothesis is particularly demanded by recent evidence that the functional architecture of orientation columns precisely follows species invariant quantitative laws. Because it would be desirable to infer the form of such an optimization principle from the biological data, the optimization approach to explain cortical functional architecture raises the following questions: i) What are the genuine ground states of candidate energy functionals and how can they be calculated with precision and rigor? ii) How do differences in candidate optimization principles impact on the predicted map structure and conversely what can be learned about a hypothetical underlying optimization principle from observations on map structure? iii) Is there a way to analyze the coordinated organization of cortical maps predicted by optimization principles in general? To answer these questions we developed a general dynamical systems approach to the combined optimization of visual cortical maps of OP and another scalar feature such as OD or spatial frequency preference. From basic symmetry assumptions we obtain a comprehensive phenomenological classification of possible inter-map coupling energies and examine representative examples. We show that each individual coupling energy leads to a different class of OP solutions with different correlations among the maps such that inferences about the optimization principle from map layout appear viable. We systematically assess whether quantitative laws resembling experimental observations can result from the coordinated optimization of orientation columns with other feature maps.
Lars Reichl, Dominik Heide, Siegrid Löwel, Justin C. Crowley, Matthias Kaschube, Fred Wolf 0002
PLoS Comput. Biol.5
2012 Coordinated Optimization of Visual Cortical Maps (II) Numerical Studies
abstract
In the juvenile brain, the synaptic architecture of the visual cortex remains in a state of flux for months after the natural onset of vision and the initial emergence of feature selectivity in visual cortical neurons. It is an attractive hypothesis that visual cortical architecture is shaped during this extended period of juvenile plasticity by the coordinated optimization of multiple visual cortical maps such as orientation preference (OP), ocular dominance (OD), spatial frequency, or direction preference. In part (I) of this study we introduced a class of analytically tractable coordinated optimization models and solved representative examples, in which a spatially complex organization of the OP map is induced by interactions between the maps. We found that these solutions near symmetry breaking threshold predict a highly ordered map layout. Here we examine the time course of the convergence towards attractor states and optima of these models. In particular, we determine the timescales on which map optimization takes place and how these timescales can be compared to those of visual cortical development and plasticity. We also assess whether our models exhibit biologically more realistic, spatially irregular solutions at a finite distance from threshold, when the spatial periodicities of the two maps are detuned and when considering more than 2 feature dimensions. We show that, although maps typically undergo substantial rearrangement, no other solutions than pinwheel crystals and stripes dominate in the emerging layouts. Pinwheel crystallization takes place on a rather short timescale and can also occur for detuned wavelengths of different maps. Our numerical results thus support the view that neither minimal energy states nor intermediate transient states of our coordinated optimization models successfully explain the architecture of the visual cortex. We discuss several alternative scenarios that may improve the agreement between model solutions and biological observations.
Lars Reichl, Dominik Heide, Siegrid Löwel, Justin C. Crowley, Matthias Kaschube, Fred Wolf 0002
PLoS Comput. Biol.5
2009 Bayesian estimation of orientation preference maps
abstract
Imaging techniques such as optical imaging of intrinsic signals, 2-photon calcium imaging and voltage sensitive dye imaging can be used to measure the functional organization of visual cortex across different spatial scales. Here, we present Bayesian methods based on Gaussian processes for extracting topographic maps from functional imaging data. In particular, we focus on the estimation of orientation preference maps (OPMs) from intrinsic signal imaging data. We model the underlying map as a bivariate Gaussian process, with a prior covariance function that reflects known properties of OPMs, and a noise covariance adjusted to the data. The posterior mean can be interpreted as an optimally smoothed estimate of the map, and can be used for model based interpolations of the map from sparse measurements. By sampling from the posterior distribution, we can get error bars on statistical properties such as preferred orientations, pinwheel locations or -counts. Finally, the use of an explicit probabilistic model facilitates interpretation of parameters and provides the basis for decoding studies. We demonstrate our model both on simulated data and on intrinsic signaling data from ferret visual cortex.
Jakob H. Macke, Sebastian Gerwinn, Leonard E. White, Matthias Kaschube, Matthias Bethge
NIPS4
2001 The prevalence of colinear contours in the real world
Matthias Kaschube, Fred Wolf 0002, Theo Geisel, Siegrid Löwel
Neurocomputing1
2000 Quantifying the variability of patterns of orientation domains in the visual cortex of cats
Matthias Kaschube, Fred Wolf 0002, Theo Geisel, Siegrid Löwel
Neurocomputing1