Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Markus Ihmsen
dblp:53/9257
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 12 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer animation and physical simulation
fluid simulation |
0.9 | 4 | 2018 | Pressure Boundaries for Implicit Incompressible SPH · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 An implicit viscosity formulation for SPH fluids · ACM Trans. Graph. 2015 Implicit Incompressible SPH · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › fluid simulation › particle-based fluid simulation
smoothed particle hydrodynamics |
0.9 | 4 | 2018 | Pressure Boundaries for Implicit Incompressible SPH · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018 An implicit viscosity formulation for SPH fluids · ACM Trans. Graph. 2015 Implicit Incompressible SPH · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › fluid simulation
viscous fluid simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | An implicit viscosity formulation for SPH fluids · ACM Trans. Graph. 2015 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › fluid simulation
incompressible fluid simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Implicit Incompressible SPH · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › fluid simulation › solid-fluid coupling
rigid-fluid coupling |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Versatile rigid-fluid coupling for incompressible SPH · ACM Trans. Graph. 2012 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › fluid simulation
solid-fluid coupling |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Versatile rigid-fluid coupling for incompressible SPH · ACM Trans. Graph. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pressure poisson equation · 0.5volume-centric SPH discretization · 0.3velocity gradient reconstruction · 0.2pressure projection · 0.2projection method · 0.2hydrodynamic forces · 0.1boundary particles · 0.1WCSPH · 0.1PCISPH · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | An optimized source term formulation for incompressible SPH
Jens Cornelis, Jan Bender, Christoph Gissler, Markus Ihmsen, Matthias Teschner |
Vis. Comput. | 4 |
| 2018 | Pressure Boundaries for Implicit Incompressible SPHabstractImplicit incompressible SPH (IISPH) solves a pressure Poisson equation (PPE). While the solution of the PPE provides pressure at fluid samples, the embedded boundary handling does not compute pressure at boundary samples. Instead, IISPH uses various approximations to remedy this deficiency. In this article, we illustrate the issues of these IISPH approximations. We particularly derive Pressure Boundaries, a novel boundary handling that overcomes previous IISPH issues by the computation of physically meaningful pressure values at boundary samples. This is basically achieved with an extended PPE. We provide a detailed description of the approach that focuses on additional technical challenges due to the incorporation of boundary samples into the PPE. We therefore use volume-centric SPH discretizations instead of typically used density-centric ones. We further analyze the properties of the proposed boundary handling and compare it to the previous IISPH boundary handling. In addition to the fact that the proposed boundary handling provides physically meaningful pressure and pressure gradients at boundary samples, we show further benefits, such as reduced pressure oscillations, improved solver convergence, and larger possible time steps. The memory footprint of fluid samples is reduced and performance gain factors of up to five compared to IISPH are presented. Stefan Band, Christoph Gissler, Markus Ihmsen, Jens Cornelis, Andreas Peer, Matthias Teschner |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 3 |
| 2017 | Generalized drag force for particle-based simulations
Christoph Gissler, Stefan Band, Andreas Peer, Markus Ihmsen, Matthias Teschner |
Comput. Graph. | 4 |
| 2015 | Liquid boundaries for implicit incompressible SPH
Jens Cornelis, Markus Ihmsen, Andreas Peer, Matthias Teschner |
Comput. Graph. | 2 |
| 2015 | An implicit viscosity formulation for SPH fluidsabstractWe present a novel implicit formulation for highly viscous fluids simulated with Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics SPH. Compared to explicit methods, our formulation is significantly more efficient and handles a larger range of viscosities. Differing from existing implicit formulations, our approach reconstructs the velocity field from a target velocity gradient. This gradient encodes a desired shear-rate damping and preserves the velocity divergence that is introduced by the SPH pressure solver to counteract density deviations. The target gradient ensures that pressure and viscosity computation do not interfere. Therefore, only one pressure projection step is required, which is in contrast to state-of-the-art implicit Eulerian formulations. While our model differs from true viscosity in that vorticity diffusion is not encoded in the target gradient, it nevertheless captures many of the qualitative behaviors of viscous liquids. Our formulation can easily be incorporated into complex scenarios with one- and two-way coupled solids and multiple fluid phases with different densities and viscosities. Andreas Peer, Markus Ihmsen, Jens Cornelis, Matthias Teschner |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |
| 2014 | IISPH-FLIP for incompressible fluidsabstractAbstract We propose to use Implicit Incompressible Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (IISPH) for pressure projection and boundary handling in Fluid‐Implicit‐Particle (FLIP) solvers for the simulation of incompressible fluids. This novel combination addresses two issues of existing SPH and FLIP solvers, namely mass preservation in FLIP and efficiency and memory consumption in SPH. First, the SPH component enables the simulation of incompressible fluids with perfect mass preservation. Second, the FLIP component efficiently enriches the SPH component with detail that is comparable to a standard SPH simulation with the same number of particles, while improving the performance by a factor of 7 and significantly reducing the memory consumption. We demonstrate that the proposed IISPH‐FLIP solver can simulate incompressible fluids with a quantifiable, imperceptible density deviation below 0.1%. We show large‐scale scenarios with up to 160 million particles that have been processed on a single desktop PC using only 15GB of memory. One‐ and two‐way coupled solids are illustrated. Jens Cornelis, Markus Ihmsen, Andreas Peer, Matthias Teschner |
Comput. Graph. Forum | 2 |
| 2014 | Implicit Incompressible SPHabstractWe propose a novel formulation of the projection method for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH). We combine a symmetric SPH pressure force and an SPH discretization of the continuity equation to obtain a discretized form of the pressure Poisson equation (PPE). In contrast to previous projection schemes, our system does consider the actual computation of the pressure force. This incorporation improves the convergence rate of the solver. Furthermore, we propose to compute the density deviation based on velocities instead of positions as this formulation improves the robustness of the time-integration scheme. We show that our novel formulation outperforms previous projection schemes and state-of-the-art SPH methods. Large time steps and small density deviations of down to 0.01 percent can be handled in typical scenarios. The practical relevance of the approach is illustrated by scenarios with up to 40 million SPH particles. Markus Ihmsen, Jens Cornelis, Barbara Solenthaler, Christopher Horvath, Matthias Teschner |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |
| 2013 | A Lagrangian framework for simulating granular material with high detail
Markus Ihmsen, Arthur Wahl, Matthias Teschner |
Comput. Graph. | 1 |
| 2012 | Parallel Surface Reconstruction for Particle-Based FluidsabstractAbstract This paper presents a novel method that improves the efficiency of high‐quality surface reconstructions for particle‐based fluids using Marching Cubes. By constructing the scalar field only in a narrow band around the surface, the computational complexity and the memory consumption scale with the fluid surface instead of the volume. Furthermore, a parallel implementation of the method is proposed. The presented method works with various scalar field construction approaches. Experiments show that our method reconstructs high‐quality surface meshes efficiently even on single‐core CPUs. It scales nearly linearly on multi‐core CPUs and runs up to fifty times faster on GPUs compared to the original scalar field construction approaches. Gizem Akinci, Markus Ihmsen, Nadir Akinci, Matthias Teschner |
Comput. Graph. Forum | 2 |
| 2012 | Versatile rigid-fluid coupling for incompressible SPHabstractWe propose a momentum-conserving two-way coupling method of SPH fluids and arbitrary rigid objects based on hydrodynamic forces. Our approach samples the surface of rigid bodies with boundary particles that interact with the fluid, preventing deficiency issues and both spatial and temporal discontinuities. The problem of inhomogeneous boundary sampling is addressed by considering the relative contribution of a boundary particle to a physical quantity. This facilitates not only the initialization process but also allows the simulation of multiple dynamic objects. Thin structures consisting of only one layer or one line of boundary particles, and also non-manifold geometries can be handled without any additional treatment. We have integrated our approach into WCSPH and PCISPH, and demonstrate its stability and flexibility with several scenarios including multiphase flow. Nadir Akinci, Markus Ihmsen, Gizem Akinci, Barbara Solenthaler, Matthias Teschner |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |
| 2012 | Unified spray, foam and air bubbles for particle-based fluids
Markus Ihmsen, Nadir Akinci, Gizem Akinci, Matthias Teschner |
Vis. Comput. | 1 |
| 2011 | A Parallel SPH Implementation on Multi-Core CPUsabstractAbstract This paper presents a parallel framework for simulating fluids with the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) method. For low computational costs per simulation step, efficient parallel neighbourhood queries are proposed and compared. To further minimize the computing time for entire simulation sequences, strategies for maximizing the time step and the respective consequences for parallel implementations are investigated. The presented experiments illustrate that the parallel framework can efficiently compute large numbers of time steps for large scenarios. In the context of neighbourhood queries, the paper presents optimizations for two efficient instances of uniform grids, that is, spatial hashing and index sort. For implementations on parallel architectures with shared memory, the paper discusses techniques with improved cache‐hit rate and reduced memory transfer. The performance of the parallel implementations of both optimized data structures is compared. The proposed solutions focus on systems with multiple CPUs. Benefits and challenges of potential GPU implementations are only briefly discussed. Markus Ihmsen, Nadir Akinci, Markus Becker 0003, Matthias Teschner |
Comput. Graph. Forum | 1 |