EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marat Teplitsky
dblp:54/1005
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 67% Algorithms and data structures · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
CONGEST model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | The round complexity of distributed sorting: extended abstract · PODC 2011 |
Distributed computing theory
distributed algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | The round complexity of distributed sorting: extended abstract · PODC 2011 |
Distributed computing theory › distributed graph algorithms
distributed selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | The round complexity of distributed sorting: extended abstract · PODC 2011 |
Algorithms and data structures
selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | The round complexity of distributed sorting: extended abstract · PODC 2011 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | The round complexity of distributed sorting: extended abstractabstractWe consider the model of fully connected networks, where in each round each node can send an O(log n)-bit message to each other node (this is the CONGEST model with diameter 1). It is known that in this model, min-weight spanning trees can be found in O(log log n) rounds. In this paper we show that distributed sorting, where each node has at most n items, can be done in time O(log log n) as well. It is also shown that selection can be done in O(1) time. (Using a concurrent result by Lenzen and Wattenhofer, the complexity of sorting is further reduced to constant.) Our algorithms are randomized, and the stated complexity bounds hold with high probability. Boaz Patt-Shamir, Marat Teplitsky |
PODC | 2 |