Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karsten Loer

dblp:54/1451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0009-0008-8971-5112ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking
0.012002
Towards Usable and Relevant Model Checking Techniques for the Analysis of Dependable Interactive Systems · ASE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design
safety-critical systems
0.012002
Towards Usable and Relevant Model Checking Techniques for the Analysis of Dependable Interactive Systems · ASE 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

SMV · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 An integrated framework for the analysis of dependable interactive systems (IFADIS): Its tool support and evaluation
Karsten Loer, Michael D. Harrison
Autom. Softw. Eng.1
2005 Analysing User Confusion in Context Aware Mobile Applications
Karsten Loer, Michael D. Harrison
INTERACT1
2002 Towards Usable and Relevant Model Checking Techniques for the Analysis of Dependable Interactive Systems
abstract
Model checking is a formal technique for the automated analysis of system models against formal requirements. Once a suitable model and property have been specified, no further interaction by the analyst is required. However, this does not make the method necessarily user friendly since the checker must be provided with appropriate and complex input data. Furthermore, counter-examples generated by the system are often difficult to interpret. Because of this complexity, model checking is not commonly used, and exhaustive exploration of system models based on finite state descriptions is not exploited within industrial dependable systems design. The paper describes the development of an integrated collection of tools around SMV, intended to make it more accessible to practicing software engineers and in particular those concerned with the human interface issues in complex safety critical systems.
Karsten Loer, Michael D. Harrison
ASE1