Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karsten Loer
dblp:54/1451
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0009-0008-8971-5112ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Towards Usable and Relevant Model Checking Techniques for the Analysis of Dependable Interactive Systems · ASE 2002 |
Requirements engineering and software design
safety-critical systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Towards Usable and Relevant Model Checking Techniques for the Analysis of Dependable Interactive Systems · ASE 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
SMV · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | An integrated framework for the analysis of dependable interactive systems (IFADIS): Its tool support and evaluation
Karsten Loer, Michael D. Harrison |
Autom. Softw. Eng. | 1 |
| 2005 | Analysing User Confusion in Context Aware Mobile Applications
Karsten Loer, Michael D. Harrison |
INTERACT | 1 |
| 2002 | Towards Usable and Relevant Model Checking Techniques for the Analysis of Dependable Interactive SystemsabstractModel checking is a formal technique for the automated analysis of system models against formal requirements. Once a suitable model and property have been specified, no further interaction by the analyst is required. However, this does not make the method necessarily user friendly since the checker must be provided with appropriate and complex input data. Furthermore, counter-examples generated by the system are often difficult to interpret. Because of this complexity, model checking is not commonly used, and exhaustive exploration of system models based on finite state descriptions is not exploited within industrial dependable systems design. The paper describes the development of an integrated collection of tools around SMV, intended to make it more accessible to practicing software engineers and in particular those concerned with the human interface issues in complex safety critical systems. Karsten Loer, Michael D. Harrison |
ASE | 1 |