Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Uzi Padan

dblp:54/3249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › equalization
adaptive equalization
0.011982
Adaptive digital matched filters · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1982
Physical-layer communications › receiver design
adaptive receiver
0.011982
Adaptive digital matched filters · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1982
Physical-layer communications › signal detection
matched filter
0.011982
Adaptive digital matched filters · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1982
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications
0.011982
Adaptive digital matched filters · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

signal-to-noise ratio analysis · 0.0maximum likelihood detection · 0.0adaptive filtering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Adaptive digital matched filters
abstract
A class ofM-ary adaptive communication receivers, both taught and untaught, for signals whose waveforms are unknown {\em a priori} is described. The optimalM-ary taught receiver for binary-valued signals and the binary symmetric channel is studied in detail. It is shown that a bank ofMadaptive digital correlators (or adaptive digital matched filters--ADMF's) represents a good approximation to the set ofMoptimal filters of that receiver. The performance of a taught ADMF is analyzed in terms of its output signal-to-noise ratio and the required number of training transmissions. This performance is compared with that of the optimal filter for the same signal. It is shown that both the ADMF and the optimal filter converge asymptotically to the digital matched filter for the signal. The general untaught optimal adaptive receiver requires a number of calculations that grows exponentially with time, and therefore is impractical to implement. A self-adapting untaught receiver. Which teaches itself on the basis of its own decisions, is shown to be practical to implement in special cases. The performance of such a receiver is analyzed. It is shown that a proper setting of threshold circuit for this receiver can speed up its rate of convergence.
Uzi Padan
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1