Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael J. Knister
dblp:54/3530
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Collaborative and social computing · 57% Interaction techniques and input · 22% User interface design and tools · 22% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
collaborative systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | A Framework for Undoing Actions in Collaborative Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 1994 |
Interaction techniques and input
interaction techniques |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | A Framework for Undoing Actions in Collaborative Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 1994 |
User interface design and tools › interaction design
undo mechanisms |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | A Framework for Undoing Actions in Collaborative Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 1994 |
Collaborative and social computing › collaborative editing
group editors |
0.0 | 2 | 1994 | DistEdit: A Distributed Toolkit for Supporting Multiple Group Editors · CSCW 1990 A Framework for Undoing Actions in Collaborative Systems · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 1994 |
Requirements engineering and software design › inconsistency management
conflict resolution |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Undoing Actions in Collaborative Work · CSCW 1992 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | DistEdit: A Distributed Toolkit for Supporting Multiple Group Editors · CSCW 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
framework design · 0.0toolkit development · 0.0evaluation · 0.0toolkit implementation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | A Framework for Undoing Actions in Collaborative SystemsabstractThe ability to undo operations is a standard feature in most single-user interactive applications. We propose a general framework for implementing undo in collaborative systems. The framework allows users to reverse their own changes individually, taking into account the possibility of conflicts between different users' operations that may prevent an undo. The proposed framework has been incorporated into DistEdit, a toolkit for building group text editors. Based on our experience with DistEdit's undo facilities, we discuss several issues that need to be taken into account in using the framework, in order to ensure that a reasonable undo behavior is provided to users. We show that the framework is also applicable to single-user systems, since the operations to undo can be selected not just on the basis of who performed them, but by any appropriate criterion, such as the document region in which the operations occurred or the time interval in which the operations were carried out. Atul Prakash 0001, Michael J. Knister |
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. | 2 |
| 1992 | Undoing Actions in Collaborative WorkabstractDue to lack of full awareness of other users' intentions, the possibility of inadvertent mistakes is higher in collaborative work, and yet most current collaborative systems fail to provide adequate facilities for undoing actions. This limitation occurs because undo facilities of single-user systems do not readily apply to collaborative systems. In this paper, we propose a general framework for undoing actions in collaborative software systems. The framework takes into account the possibility of conflicts between different users' actions that may prevent a normal undo. The framework also allows selection of actions to undo based on who performed them, where they occurred, or any other appropriate criteria. 1 Introduction The ability to reverse, or undo, the effects of previous actions has become a common feature in modern application software. This ability is particularly valuable in collaborative applications, but it is technically much more difficult to implement than in a single-us... Atul Prakash 0001, Michael J. Knister |
CSCW | 2 |
| 1990 | DistEdit: A Distributed Toolkit for Supporting Multiple Group EditorsabstractThe purpose of our project is to provide toolkits for building applications that support collaboration between people in distributed environments. In this paper, we describe one such toolkit, called DistEdit, that can be used to build interactive group editors for distributed environments. This toolkit has the ability to support different editors simultaneously and provides a high degree of fault-tolerance against machine crashes. To evaluate the toolkit, we modified two editors to make use of the toolkit. The resulting editors allow users to take turns at making changes while other users observe the changes as they occur. We give an evaluation of the toolkit based on the development and use of these editors. Michael J. Knister, Atul Prakash 0001 |
CSCW | 1 |