Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan Edler

dblp:54/4235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Parallel and multicore computing · 32% Memory systems · 29% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 26%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
cluster interconnect
0.011998
User-Space Communication: A Quantitative Study · SC 1998
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel communication
user-level communication
0.011998
User-Space Communication: A Quantitative Study · SC 1998
Memory systems › data locality
cache locality
0.011996
Thread Scheduling for Cache Locality · ASPLOS 1996
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel scheduling
thread scheduling
0.011996
Thread Scheduling for Cache Locality · ASPLOS 1996
Memory systems
cache coherence
0.011985
Issues Related to MIMD Shared-memory Computers: The NYU Ultracomputer Approach · ISCA 1985
Memory systems › shared memory
scalable shared memory
0.011985
Issues Related to MIMD Shared-memory Computers: The NYU Ultracomputer Approach · ISCA 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-copy protocol · 0.0quantitative comparison · 0.0thread creation hints · 0.0fine-grained threading · 0.0scalable architecture · 0.0hardware-software co-design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 User-Space Communication: A Quantitative Study
abstract
Powerful commodity systems and networks offer a promising direction for high performance computing because they are inexpensive and they closely track technology progress. However, high, raw-hardware performance is rarely delivered to the end user. Previous work has shown that the bottleneck in these architectures is the overheads imposed by the software communication layer. To reduce these overheads, researchers have proposed a number of user-space communication models. The common feature of these models is that applications have direct access to the network, bypassing the operating system in the common case and thus avoiding the cost of send/receive system calls. In this paper we examine five user-space communication layers, that represent different points in the configuration space: Generic AM, BIP-0.92, FM-2.02, PM-1.2, and VMMC-2. Although these systems support different communication paradigms and employ a variety of different implementation tradeoffs, we are able to quantitatively compare them on a single testbed consisting of a cluster of high-end PCs connected by a Myrinet network. We find that all five communication systems have very low latency for small messages, in the range of 5 to 17 s. Not surprisingly, this range is strongly influenced by the functionality offered by each system. We are encouraged, however, to find that features such as protected and reliable communication at user level and multiprogramming can be provided at very low cost. Bandwidth, however, depends primarily on how data is transferred between host memory and the network. Most of the investigated libraries support zero-copy protocols for certain types of data transfers, but differ significantly in the bandwidth delivered to end users. The highest bandwidth, between 95 and 125 MBytes/s for long message transfers, is delivered by libraries that use DMA on both send and receive sides and avoid all data copies. Libraries that perform additional data copies or use programmed I/O to send data to the network achieve lower maximum bandwidth, in the range of 60-70 MBytes/s.
Soichiro Araki, Angelos Bilas, Cezary Dubnicki, Jan Edler, Koichi Konishi, James Philbin
SC4
1996 Thread Scheduling for Cache Locality
abstract
This paper describes a method to improve the cache locality of sequential programs by scheduling fine-grained threads. The algorithm relies upon hints provided at the time of thread creation to determine a thread execution order likely to reduce cache misses. This technique may be particularly valuable when compiler-directed tiling is not feasible. Experiments with several application programs, on two systems with different cache structures, show that our thread scheduling method can improve program performance by reducing second-level cache misses.
James Philbin, Jan Edler, Otto J. Anshus, Craig C. Douglas, Kai Li 0001
ASPLOS2
1985 Issues Related to MIMD Shared-memory Computers: The NYU Ultracomputer Approach
abstract
We present an updated report on the NYU Ultracomputer design emphasizing recent results on programming, operating systems, caching, demand paging, and I/O.The user's view of the Ultracomputer is presented along with the hardware and software implementation.Freedom from serial bottlenecks in both hardware and software allows the Ultracomputer to obtain performance that scales nearly linearly in the size of the machine for a broad spectrum of problems.
Jan Edler, Allan Gottlieb, Clyde P. Kruskal, Kevin P. McAuliffe, Larry Rudolph, Marc Snir, Patricia J. Teller
ISCA1