Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jason J. Sroka

dblp:54/4324 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition
continuous speech recognition
0.011994
Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts Methodology Applied to Continuous Speech Recognition · NIPS 1994
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.011994
Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts Methodology Applied to Continuous Speech Recognition · NIPS 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.0hidden markov model · 0.0expectation-maximization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Sensor subset selection for surface electromyograpy based speech recognition
abstract
The authors previously reported speaker-dependent automatic speech recognition accuracy for isolated words using eleven surface-electromyographic (sEMG) sensors in fixed recording locations on the face and neck. The original array of sensors was chosen to ensure ample coverage of the muscle groups known to contribute to articulation during speech production. In this paper we systematically analyzed speech recognition performance from sensor subsets with the goal of reducing the number of sensors needed and finding the best combination of sensor locations to achieve word recognition rates comparable to the full set. We evaluated each of the different possible subsets by its mean word recognition rate across nine speakers using HMM modeling of MFCC and co-activation features derived from the subset of sensor signals. We show empirically that five sensors are sufficient to achieve a recognition rate to within a half a percentage point of that obtainable from the full set of sensors.
Glen Colby, James T. Heaton, L. Donald Gilmore, Jason J. Sroka, Yunbin Deng, Joao Cabrera, Serge H. Roy, Carlo J. De Luca, Geoffrey S. Meltzner
ICASSP4
2008 Speech recognition for vocalized and subvocal modes of production using surface EMG signals from the neck and face
abstract
We report automatic speech recognition accuracy for individual words using eleven surface electromyographic (sEMG) recording locations on the face and neck during three speaking modes: vocalized, mouthed, and mentally rehearsed. An HMM based recognition system was trained and tested on a 65 word vocabulary produced by 9 American English speakers in all three speaking modes. Our results indicate high sEMG-based recognition accuracy for the vocalized and mouthed speaking modes (mean rates of 92.1 % and 86.7% respectively), but an inability to conduct recognition on mentally rehearsed speech due to a lack of sufficient sEMG activity. Index Terms: sEMG, subvocal speech, speech recognition
Geoffrey S. Meltzner, Jason J. Sroka, James T. Heaton, L. Donald Gilmore, Glen Colby, Serge H. Roy, Nancy Chen, Carlo J. De Luca
INTERSPEECH2
2005 Human and machine consonant recognition
Jason J. Sroka, Louis D. Braida
Speech Commun.1
1995 Hierarchical mixtures of experts methodology applied to continuous speech recognition
abstract
We incorporate the hierarchical mixtures of experts (HME) method of probability estimation, developed by Jordan (see Neural Computation, 1994), into an HMM-based continuous speech recognition system. The resulting system can be thought of as a continuous-density HMM system, but instead of using Gaussian mixtures, the HME system employs a large set of hierarchically organized but relatively small neural networks to perform the probability density estimation. The hierarchical structure is reminiscent of a decision tree except for two important differences: each "expert" or neural net performs a "soft" decision rather than a hard decision, and, unlike ordinary decision trees, the parameters of all the neural nets in the HME are automatically trainable using the EM algorithm. We report results on the ARPA 5,000-word and 40,000-word Wall Street Journal corpus using HME models.
Ying Zhao 0006, Richard M. Schwartz, Jason J. Sroka, John Makhoul
ICASSP3
1994 Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts Methodology Applied to Continuous Speech Recognition
abstract
In this paper, we incorporate the Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts (HME) method of probability estimation, developed by Jordan [1], into an HMM(cid:173) based continuous speech recognition system. The resulting system can be thought of as a continuous-density HMM system, but instead of using gaussian mixtures, the HME system employs a large set of hierarchically organized but relatively small neural networks to perform the probability density estimation. The hierarchical structure is reminiscent of a decision tree except for two important differences: each "expert" or neural net performs a "soft" decision rather than a hard decision, and, unlike ordinary decision trees, the parameters of all the neural nets in the HME are automatically trainable using the EM algorithm. We report results on the ARPA 5,OOO-word and 4O,OOO-word Wall Street Journal corpus using HME models.
Ying Zhao 0006, Richard M. Schwartz, Jason J. Sroka, John Makhoul
NIPS3