Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aaron A. Klammer
dblp:54/4860
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide identification |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Modeling peptide fragmentation with dynamic Bayesian networks for peptide identification · ISMB 2008 Peptide Retention Time Prediction Yields Improved Tandem Mass Spectrum Identification for Diverse Chromatography Conditions · RECOMB 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Peptide Retention Time Prediction Yields Improved Tandem Mass Spectrum Identification for Diverse Chromatography Conditions · RECOMB 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
retention time prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Peptide Retention Time Prediction Yields Improved Tandem Mass Spectrum Identification for Diverse Chromatography Conditions · RECOMB 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.1dynamic bayesian network · 0.1mass spectrometry · 0.1machine learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Modeling peptide fragmentation with dynamic Bayesian networks for peptide identificationabstractMOTIVATION: Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is an indispensable technology for identification of proteins from complex mixtures. Proteins are digested to peptides that are then identified by their fragmentation patterns in the mass spectrometer. Thus, at its core, MS/MS protein identification relies on the relative predictability of peptide fragmentation. Unfortunately, peptide fragmentation is complex and not fully understood, and what is understood is not always exploited by peptide identification algorithms. RESULTS: We use a hybrid dynamic Bayesian network (DBN)/support vector machine (SVM) approach to address these two problems. We train a set of DBNs on high-confidence peptide-spectrum matches. These DBNs, known collectively as Riptide, comprise a probabilistic model of peptide fragmentation chemistry. Examination of the distributions learned by Riptide allows identification of new trends, such as prevalent a-ion fragmentation at peptide cleavage sites C-term to hydrophobic residues. In addition, Riptide can be used to produce likelihood scores that indicate whether a given peptide-spectrum match is correct. A vector of such scores is evaluated by an SVM, which produces a final score to be used in peptide identification. Using Riptide in this way yields improved discrimination when compared to other state-of-the-art MS/MS identification algorithms, increasing the number of positive identifications by as much as 12% at a 1% false discovery rate. AVAILABILITY: Python and C source code are available upon request from the authors. The curated training sets are available at http://noble.gs.washington.edu/proj/intense/. The Graphical Model Tool Kit (GMTK) is freely available at http://ssli.ee.washington.edu/bilmes/gmtk. Aaron A. Klammer, Sheila M. Reynolds, Jeff A. Bilmes, Michael J. MacCoss, William Stafford Noble |
ISMB | 1 |
| 2007 | Peptide Retention Time Prediction Yields Improved Tandem Mass Spectrum Identification for Diverse Chromatography Conditions
Aaron A. Klammer, Xianhua Yi, Michael J. MacCoss, William Stafford Noble |
RECOMB | 1 |