Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert B. Scharpf
dblp:54/5470
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4702-2656ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimation of cancer cell fractions and clone trees from multi-region sequencing of tumors · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor evolution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Estimation of cancer cell fractions and clone trees from multi-region sequencing of tumors · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
copy number variation detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Detection of de novo copy number deletions from targeted sequencing of trios · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
genetics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Detection of rare disease variants in extended pedigrees using RVS · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › rare variant analysis
rare variant association testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Detection of rare disease variants in extended pedigrees using RVS · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
copy number variant analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Performance assessment of copy number microarray platforms using a spike-in experiment · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Performance assessment of copy number microarray platforms using a spike-in experiment · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
single nucleotide polymorphism analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | SNPchip: R classes and methods for SNP array data · Bioinform. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian hierarchical model · 1.1ensemble visualization · 0.6edger · 0.6minimum distance estimation · 0.4identical-by-descent sharing · 0.4statistical modeling · 0.1spike-in experiment · 0.1sensitivity and specificity analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Detecting and quantifying antibody reactivity in PhIP-Seq data with BEERabstractSUMMARY: Because of their high abundance, easy accessibility in peripheral blood, and relative stability ex vivo, antibodies serve as excellent records of environmental exposures and immune responses. Phage Immuno-Precipitation Sequencing (PhIP-Seq) is the most efficient technique available for assessing antibody binding to hundreds of thousands of peptides at a cohort scale. PhIP-Seq is a high-throughput approach for assessing antibody reactivity to hundreds of thousands of candidate epitopes. Accurate detection of weakly reactive peptides is particularly important for characterizing the development and decline of antibody responses. Here, we present BEER (Bayesian Enrichment Estimation in R), a software package specifically developed for the quantification of peptide reactivity from PhIP-Seq experiments. BEER implements a hierarchical model and produces posterior probabilities for peptide reactivity and a fold change estimate to quantify the magnitude. BEER also offers functionality to infer peptide reactivity based on the edgeR package, though the improvement in speed is offset by slightly lower sensitivity compared to the Bayesian approach, specifically for weakly reactive peptides. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BEER is implemented in R and freely available from the Bioconductor repository at https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/beer.html. Athena Chen, Kai Kammers, H. Benjamin Larman, Robert B. Scharpf, Ingo Ruczinski |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2022 | Estimation of cancer cell fractions and clone trees from multi-region sequencing of tumorsabstractMOTIVATION: Multi-region sequencing of solid tumors can improve our understanding of intratumor subclonal diversity and the evolutionary history of mutational events. Due to uncertainty in clonal composition and the multitude of possible ancestral relationships between clones, elucidating the most probable relationships from bulk tumor sequencing poses statistical and computational challenges. RESULTS: We developed a Bayesian hierarchical model called PICTograph to model uncertainty in assigning mutations to subclones, to enable posterior distributions of cancer cell fractions (CCFs) and to visualize the most probable ancestral relationships between subclones. Compared with available methods, PICTograph provided more consistent and accurate estimates of CCFs and improved tree inference over a range of simulated clonal diversity. Application of PICTograph to multi-region whole-exome sequencing of tumors from individuals with pancreatic cancer precursor lesions confirmed known early-occurring mutations and indicated substantial molecular diversity, including 6-12 distinct subclones and intra-sample mixing of subclones. Using ensemble-based visualizations, we highlight highly probable evolutionary relationships recovered in multiple models. PICTograph provides a useful approximation to evolutionary inference from cross-sectional multi-region sequencing, particularly for complex cases. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/KarchinLab/pictograph. The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Lily Zheng, Noushin Niknafs, Laura D. Wood, Rachel Karchin, Robert B. Scharpf |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2019 | Detection of de novo copy number deletions from targeted sequencing of triosabstractMOTIVATION: De novo copy number deletions have been implicated in many diseases, but there is no formal method to date that identifies de novo deletions in parent-offspring trios from capture-based sequencing platforms. RESULTS: We developed Minimum Distance for Targeted Sequencing (MDTS) to fill this void. MDTS has similar sensitivity (recall), but a much lower false positive rate compared to less specific CNV callers, resulting in a much higher positive predictive value (precision). MDTS also exhibited much better scalability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MDTS is freely available as open source software from the Bioconductor repository. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jack M. Fu, Elizabeth J. Leslie, Alan F. Scott, Jeffrey C. Murray, Mary L. Marazita, Terri H. Beaty, Robert B. Scharpf, Ingo Ruczinski |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2019 | Detection of rare disease variants in extended pedigrees using RVSabstractSUMMARY: Family-based sequencing studies enable researchers to identify highly penetrant genetic variants too rare to be tested in conventional case-control studies, by studying co-segregation of variant and disease phenotypes. When multiple affected subjects in a family are sequenced, the probability that a variant or a set of variants is shared identical-by-descent by some or all affected relatives provides evidence against the null hypothesis of complete absence of linkage and association. The Rare Variant Sharing software package RVS implements a suite of tools to assess association and linkage between rare genetic variants and a dichotomous disease indicator in family pedigrees. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: RVS is available as open source software from the Bioconductor webpage at https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/RVS.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Thomas Sherman, Jack M. Fu, Robert B. Scharpf, Alexandre Bureau, Ingo Ruczinski |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2012 | Fast detection of de novo copy number variants from SNP arrays for case-parent triosabstractBACKGROUND: In studies of case-parent trios, we define copy number variants (CNVs) in the offspring that differ from the parental copy numbers as de novo and of interest for their potential functional role in disease. Among the leading array-based methods for discovery of de novo CNVs in case-parent trios is the joint hidden Markov model (HMM) implemented in the PennCNV software. However, the computational demands of the joint HMM are substantial and the extent to which false positive identifications occur in case-parent trios has not been well described. We evaluate these issues in a study of oral cleft case-parent trios. RESULTS: Our analysis of the oral cleft trios reveals that genomic waves represent a substantial source of false positive identifications in the joint HMM, despite a wave-correction implementation in PennCNV. In addition, the noise of low-level summaries of relative copy number (log R ratios) is strongly associated with batch and correlated with the frequency of de novo CNV calls. Exploiting the trio design, we propose a univariate statistic for relative copy number referred to as the minimum distance that can reduce technical variation from probe effects and genomic waves. We use circular binary segmentation to segment the minimum distance and maximum a posteriori estimation to infer de novo CNVs from the segmented genome. Compared to PennCNV on simulated data, MinimumDistance identifies fewer false positives on average and is comparable to PennCNV with respect to false negatives. Genomic waves contribute to discordance of PennCNV and MinimumDistance for high coverage de novo calls, while highly concordant calls on chromosome 22 were validated by quantitative PCR. Computationally, MinimumDistance provides a nearly 8-fold increase in speed relative to the joint HMM in a study of oral cleft trios. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that batch effects and genomic waves are important considerations for case-parent studies of de novo CNV, and that the minimum distance is an effective statistic for reducing technical variation contributing to false de novo discoveries. Coupled with segmentation and maximum a posteriori estimation, our algorithm compares favorably to the joint HMM with MinimumDistance being much faster. Robert B. Scharpf, Terri H. Beaty, Holger Schwender, Samuel G. Younkin, Alan F. Scott, Ingo Ruczinski |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Performance assessment of copy number microarray platforms using a spike-in experimentabstractMOTIVATION: Changes in the copy number of chromosomal DNA segments [copy number variants (CNVs)] have been implicated in human variation, heritable diseases and cancers. Microarray-based platforms are the current established technology of choice for studies reporting these discoveries and constitute the benchmark against which emergent sequence-based approaches will be evaluated. Research that depends on CNV analysis is rapidly increasing, and systematic platform assessments that distinguish strengths and weaknesses are needed to guide informed choice. RESULTS: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of six platforms, provided by four leading vendors, using a spike-in experiment. NimbleGen and Agilent platforms outperformed Illumina and Affymetrix in accuracy and precision of copy number dosage estimates. However, Illumina and Affymetrix algorithms that leverage single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) information make up for this disadvantage and perform well at variant detection. Overall, the NimbleGen 2.1M platform outperformed others, but only with the use of an alternative data analysis pipeline to the one offered by the manufacturer. AVAILABILITY: The data is available from http://rafalab.jhsph.edu/cnvcomp/. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Eitan Halper-Stromberg, Laurence Frelin, Ingo Ruczinski, Robert B. Scharpf, Chunfa Jie, Benilton S. Carvalho, Haiping Hao, Kurt N. Hetrick, Anne Jedlicka, Amanda Dziedzic, Kim Doheny, Alan F. Scott, Steve Baylin, Jonathan Pevsner, Forrest Spencer, Rafael A. Irizarry |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2007 | SNPchip: R classes and methods for SNP array dataabstractUNLABELLED: High-density single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays (SNP chips) provide information on a subject's genome, such as copy number and genotype (heterozygosity/homozygosity) at a SNP. While fluorescence in situ hybridization and karyotyping reveal many abnormalities, SNP chips provide a higher resolution map of the human genome that can be used to detect, e.g., aneuploidies, microdeletions, microduplications and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). As a variety of diseases are linked to such chromosomal abnormalities, SNP chips promise new insights for these diseases by aiding in the discovery of such regions, and may suggest targets for intervention. The R package SNPchip contains classes and methods useful for storing, visualizing and analyzing high density SNP data. Originally developed from the SNPscan web-tool, SNPchip utilizes S4 classes and extends other open source R tools available at Bioconductor. This has numerous advantages, including the ability to build statistical models for SNP-level data that operate on instances of the class, and to communicate with other R packages that add additional functionality. AVAILABILITY: The package is available from the Bioconductor web page at www.bioconductor.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplementary material as described in this article (case studies, installation guidelines and R code) is available from http://biostat.jhsph.edu/~iruczins/publications/sm/ Robert B. Scharpf, Jason C. Ting, Jonathan Pevsner, Ingo Ruczinski |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2007 | Pre-processing Agilent microarray dataabstractBACKGROUND: Pre-processing methods for two-sample long oligonucleotide arrays, specifically the Agilent technology, have not been extensively studied. The goal of this study is to quantify some of the sources of error that affect measurement of expression using Agilent arrays and to compare Agilent's Feature Extraction software with pre-processing methods that have become the standard for normalization of cDNA arrays. These include log transformation followed by loess normalization with or without background subtraction and often a between array scale normalization procedure. The larger goal is to define best study design and pre-processing practices for Agilent arrays, and we offer some suggestions. RESULTS: Simple loess normalization without background subtraction produced the lowest variability. However, without background subtraction, fold changes were biased towards zero, particularly at low intensities. ROC analysis of a spike-in experiment showed that differentially expressed genes are most reliably detected when background is not subtracted. Loess normalization and no background subtraction yielded an AUC of 99.7% compared with 88.8% for Agilent processed fold changes. All methods performed well when error was taken into account by t- or z-statistics, AUCs > or = 99.8%. A substantial proportion of genes showed dye effects, 43% (99% CI: 39%, 47%). However, these effects were generally small regardless of the pre-processing method. CONCLUSION: Simple loess normalization without background subtraction resulted in low variance fold changes that more reliably ranked gene expression than the other methods. While t-statistics and other measures that take variation into account, including Agilent's z-statistic, can also be used to reliably select differentially expressed genes, fold changes are a standard measure of differential expression for exploratory work, cross platform comparison, and biological interpretation and can not be entirely replaced. Although dye effects are small for most genes, many array features are affected. Therefore, an experimental design that incorporates dye swaps or a common reference could be valuable. Marianna Zahurak, Giovanni Parmigiani, Wayne Yu, Robert B. Scharpf, David Berman, Edward M. Schaeffer, Shabana Shabbeer, Leslie Cope |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |