Abstract We consider three strong reducibilities, $s_{1}, s_{2}, Q_{1}$ (where we identify a reducibility $\leqslant _r$ with its index $r$). The first two reducibilities can be viewed as injective versions of $s$-reducibility, whereas $Q_1$-reducibility can be viewed as an injective version of $Q$-reducibility. We have, with proper inclusions, $s_{1} \subset s_{2} \subset s$. It is well known that there is no minimal $s$-degree, and there is no minimal $Q$-degree. We show on the contrary that there exist minimal $\varDelta ^{0}_{2}$$s_{2}$-degrees and minimal $\varDelta ^{0}_{2}$$s_{1}$-degrees. On the other hand, both the $\varPi ^{0}_{1}$$s_{2}$-degrees and the $\varPi ^{0}_{1}$$s_{1}$-degrees are downwards dense. By the isomorphism of the $s_1$-degrees with the $Q_1$-degrees induced by complementation of sets, it follows that there exist minimal $\varDelta ^0_2$$Q_1$-degrees, but the c.e. $Q_{1}$-degrees are downwards dense.

Abstract The current work includes a result announced in the year 2012 which was unproven for 10 years. The result shows that there is a co-r.e. tree with uncountably many infinite branches such that the nonisolated infinite branches of the constructed tree are all nonrecursive, generalised low, and hyperimmune-free and form a perfect tree. This article is the journal version of two conference articles from 2012 and 2022; the article contains the main result proved in 2022 and also the other major results from 2012.

Abstract We define a class of computable functions over real numbers using functional schemes similar to the class of primitive and partial recursive functions defined by Gödel (1931, 1934) and Kleene (1936, Math. Ann., 112, 727–742). We show that this class of functions can also be characterized by MS-machines, which are Turing machine-like devices. The proof of the characterization gives a normal form theorem in the style of Kleene (1936, Math. Ann., 112, 727–742). Furthermore, this characterization is a natural combination of two most influential theories of computation over real numbers, namely the type-two theory of effectivity (see, e.g. Weihrauch (2000, Springer)) and the Blum–Shub–Smale (1989, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 21, 1–46) model of computation. Under this notion of computability, the recursive (or computable) subsets of real numbers are exactly effective $\varDelta ^0_2$ sets.

We show that the diamond lattice can be embedded into the Σ02enumeration degrees preserving 0 and 1, with atoms one high and Π01, and the other one low.

Abstract We show that the structure of recursively enumerable degrees is not a Σ1-elementary substructure of , where (n > 1) is the structure of n-r.e. degrees in the Ershov hierarchy.

Abstract We show that every nonzero Δ20, e-degree bounds a minimal pair. On the other hand, there exist Σ20, e-degrees which bound no minimal pair.

Abstract Let [NB]1 denote the ideal generated by nonbounding c.e. degrees and NCup the ideal of noncuppable c.e. degrees. We show that both [NB]1 ∩ NCup and the ideal generated by nonbounding and noncuppable degrees are new, in the sense that they are different from M, [NB]1 and NCup—the only three known definable ideals so far.

The study of recursion theory on models of fragments of Peano arithmetic has hitherto been concentrated on recursively enumerable (r.e.) sets and their degrees (with a few exceptions, such as that in [2] on minimal degrees). The reason for such a concerted effort is clear: priority arguments have occupied a central position in post Friedberg-Muchnik recursion theory, and after almost forty years of intensive development in the subject, they are still the essential tools on which investigations of r.e. sets and their degrees depend. There are two possible approaches to the study within fragments of arithmetic: To give a general analysis of strategies, and identify their proof-theoretic strengths (for example in [6] on infinite injury priority methods), or to consider specific theorems in recursion theory, and, if possible, pinpoint the exact levels of induction provably equivalent to the theorems. The work reported in this paper belongs to the second approach. More precisely, we single out two infinitary injury type constructions of r.e. sets—one concerning maximal sets and the other based on the notion of the jump operator—to be the topics of study.

Let P− denote the Peano axioms minus the induction scheme. Let IΣn, (I∏n), BΣn (B∏n), LΣn (L∏n denote the induction scheme, the collection scheme, and the least number principle for Σn-(∏n-) formulas respectively. Paris and Kirby [3] studied the relative proof-theoretic strengths of those schemes. The general theorem states that IΣn, I∏n, LΣn, and L∏n are equivalent; IΣn implies BΣn implies IΣn–1; but not conversely. In recent years, people have been interested in doing recursion theory on fragments of arithmetic. One of the purposes of this study is to understand the priority methods. Much work has been done in this area. For example, M. Mytilinaios [5] showed that the Sacks splitting theorem can be proven in P− + IΣ1. Later, J. Mourad showed that the Sacks splitting theorem is indeed equivalent to IΣ1 [4]. M. Groszek and M. Mytilinaios [1] showed that P− + IΣ2 is sufficient to prove the existence of a high incomplete r.e. set. On the other hand, M. Mytilinaios and T. Slaman [6] showed that P− + IΣ1 is too weak to prove the existence of such a set. A natural question to ask is if the existence of such a set implies IΣ2. In this paper, we will show the answer is negative by constructing a model of P− + IΣ1 + ¬BΣ2 which has a high incomplete r.e. set. Notice that, as shown by M. Groszek and T. Slaman in [2], P− + IΣ1 is too weak to show the transitivity of weak Turing reducibility on Σ2-sets.