Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Grzegorz Swirszcz
dblp:54/6341
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 10% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 71% Approximation and online algorithms · 29% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Gradient Forward-Propagation for Large-Scale Temporal Video Modelling · CVPR 2021 Sideways: Depth-Parallel Training of Video Models · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
learning rate tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Stepping on the Edge: Curvature Aware Learning Rate Tuners · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Stepping on the Edge: Curvature Aware Learning Rate Tuners · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Gradient Forward-Propagation for Large-Scale Temporal Video Modelling · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
model parallelism |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Gradient Forward-Propagation for Large-Scale Temporal Video Modelling · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
neural network verification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Verification of Non-Linear Specifications for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Understanding Synthetic Gradients and Decoupled Neural Interfaces · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training › local learning
decoupled neural interfaces |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Understanding Synthetic Gradients and Decoupled Neural Interfaces · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
function approximation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Sobolev Training for Neural Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
sobolev training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Sobolev Training for Neural Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Approximation Algorithms for the Joint Replenishment Problem with Deadlines · ICALP (1) 2013 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › due date scheduling
deadline scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Approximation Algorithms for the Joint Replenishment Problem with Deadlines · ICALP (1) 2013 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Approximation Algorithms for the Joint Replenishment Problem with Deadlines · ICALP (1) 2013 |
Approximation and online algorithms
joint replenishment problem |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Approximation Algorithms for the Joint Replenishment Problem with Deadlines · ICALP (1) 2013 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization › regularized regression
lasso |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-level Lasso for Sparse Multi-task Regression · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization
regularized regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-level Lasso for Sparse Multi-task Regression · ICML 2012 |
Mathematical optimization
multitask learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-level Lasso for Sparse Multi-task Regression · ICML 2012 |
Mathematical optimization
sparse optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Multi-level Lasso for Sparse Multi-task Regression · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
variable selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Grouped Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Variable Selection and Prediction · NIPS 2009 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
group variable selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Grouped Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Variable Selection and Prediction · NIPS 2009 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
sparse regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Grouped Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Variable Selection and Prediction · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › sparse regularization
l1 regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | l1 Regularization in Infinite Dimensional Feature Spaces · COLT 2007 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | l1 Regularization in Infinite Dimensional Feature Spaces · COLT 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sideways training · 0.9warm-up schedules · 0.8hessian eigenvalue analysis · 0.8skip connections · 0.5forward gradient propagation · 0.5approximate backpropagation · 0.4synthetic gradient estimation · 0.3sobolev norm · 0.3knowledge distillation · 0.3backpropagation · 0.3primal-dual · 0.2linear programming rounding · 0.2lasso regularization · 0.1orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.1lasso · 0.1group lasso · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Stepping on the Edge: Curvature Aware Learning Rate TunersabstractCurvature information -- particularly, the largest eigenvalue of the loss
Hessian, known as the sharpness -- often forms the basis for learning rate
tuners. However, recent work has shown that the curvature information undergoes
complex dynamics during training, going from a phase of increasing sharpness to
eventual stabilization. We analyze the closed-loop feedback effect between
learning rate tuning and curvature. We find that classical learning rate tuners
may yield greater one-step loss reduction, yet they ultimately underperform in
the long term when compared to constant learning rates in the full batch regime.
These models break the stabilization of the sharpness, which we explain using a
simplified model of the joint dynamics of the learning rate and the curvature.
To further investigate these effects, we introduce a new learning rate tuning
method, Curvature Dynamics Aware Tuning (CDAT), which prioritizes long term
curvature stabilization over instantaneous progress on the objective. In the
full batch regime, CDAT shows behavior akin to prefixed warm-up schedules on deep
learning objectives, outperforming tuned constant learning rates. In the mini
batch regime, we observe that stochasticity introduces confounding effects that
explain the previous success of some learning rate tuners at appropriate batch
sizes. Our findings highlight the critical role of understanding the joint
dynamics of the learning rate and curvature, beyond greedy minimization, to
diagnose failures and design effective adaptive learning rate tuners. Vincent Roulet, Atish Agarwala, Jean-Bastien Grill, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Mathieu Blondel, Fabian Pedregosa |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Gradient Forward-Propagation for Large-Scale Temporal Video ModellingabstractHow can neural networks be trained on large-volume temporal data efficiently? To compute the gradients required to update parameters, backpropagation blocks computations until the forward and backward passes are completed. For temporal signals, this introduces high latency and hinders real-time learning. It also creates a coupling between consecutive layers, which limits model parallelism and increases memory consumption. In this paper, we build upon Sideways, which avoids blocking by propagating approximate gradients forward in time, and we propose mechanisms for temporal integration of information based on different variants of skip connections. We also show how to decouple computation and delegate individual neural modules to different devices, allowing distributed and parallel training. The proposed Skip-Sideways achieves low latency training, model parallelism, and, importantly, is capable of extracting temporal features, leading to more stable training and improved performance on real-world action recognition video datasets such as HMDB51, UCF101, and the large-scale Kinetics-600. Finally, we also show that models trained with Skip-Sideways generate better future frames than Sideways models, and hence they can better utilize motion cues. Mateusz Malinowski, Dimitrios Vytiniotis, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Viorica Patraucean, João Carreira 0001 |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2020 | Sideways: Depth-Parallel Training of Video ModelsabstractWe propose Sideways, an approximate backpropagation scheme for training video models. In standard backpropagation, the gradients and activations at every computation step through the model are temporally synchronized. The forward activations need to be stored until the backward pass is executed, preventing inter-layer (depth) parallelization. However, can we leverage smooth, redundant input streams such as videos to develop a more efficient training scheme? Here, we explore an alternative to backpropagation; we overwrite network activations whenever new ones, i.e., from new frames, become available. Such a more gradual accumulation of information from both passes breaks the precise correspondence between gradients and activations, leading to theoretically more noisy weight updates. Counter-intuitively, we show that Sideways training of deep convolutional video networks not only still converges, but can also potentially exhibit better generalization compared to standard synchronized backpropagation. Mateusz Malinowski, Grzegorz Swirszcz, João Carreira 0001, Viorica Patraucean |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2019 | Distilling Policy DistillationabstractThe transfer of knowledge from one policy to another is an important tool in Deep Reinforcement Learning. This process, referred to as distillation, has been used to great success, for example, by enhancing the optimisation of agents, leading to stronger performance faster, on harder domains. Despite the widespread use and conceptual simplicity of distillation, many different formulations are used in practice, and the subtle variations between them can often drastically change the performance and the resulting objective that is being optimised. In this work, we rigorously explore the entire landscape of policy distillation, comparing the motivations and strengths of each variant through theoretical and empirical analysis. Our results point to three distillation techniques, that are preferred depending on specifics of the task. Specifically a newly proposed expected entropy regularised distillation allows for quicker learning in a wide range of situations, while still guaranteeing convergence. Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, Razvan Pascanu, Simon Osindero, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Max Jaderberg |
AISTATS | 5 |
| 2019 | Verification of Non-Linear Specifications for Neural Networks
Chongli Qin, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Brendan O'Donoghue, Rudy Bunel, Robert Stanforth, Sven Gowal, Jonathan Uesato, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Pushmeet Kohli |
ICLR (Poster) | 8 |
| 2017 | Understanding Synthetic Gradients and Decoupled Neural InterfacesabstractWhen training neural networks, the use of Synthetic Gradients (SG) allows layers or modules to be trained without update locking – without waiting for a true error gradient to be backpropagated – resulting in Decoupled Neural Interfaces (DNIs). This unlocked ability of being able to update parts of a neural network asynchronously and with only local information was demonstrated to work empirically in Jaderberg et al (2016). However, there has been very little demonstration of what changes DNIs and SGs impose from a functional, representational, and learning dynamics point of view. In this paper, we study DNIs through the use of synthetic gradients on feed-forward networks to better understand their behaviour and elucidate their effect on optimisation. We show that the incorporation of SGs does not affect the representational strength of the learning system for a neural network, and prove the convergence of the learning system for linear and deep linear models. On practical problems we investigate the mechanism by which synthetic gradient estimators approximate the true loss, and, surprisingly, how that leads to drastically different layer-wise representations. Finally, we also expose the relationship of using synthetic gradients to other error approximation techniques and find a unifying language for discussion and comparison. Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Max Jaderberg, Simon Osindero, Oriol Vinyals, Koray Kavukcuoglu |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | Sobolev Training for Neural NetworksabstractAt the heart of deep learning we aim to use neural networks as function approximators - training them to produce outputs from inputs in emulation of a ground truth function or data creation process. In many cases we only have access to input-output pairs from the ground truth, however it is becoming more common to have access to derivatives of the target output with respect to the input -- for example when the ground truth function is itself a neural network such as in network compression or distillation. Generally these target derivatives are not computed, or are ignored. This paper introduces Sobolev Training for neural networks, which is a method for incorporating these target derivatives in addition the to target values while training. By optimising neural networks to not only approximate the function’s outputs but also the function’s derivatives we encode additional information about the target function within the parameters of the neural network. Thereby we can improve the quality of our predictors, as well as the data-efficiency and generalization capabilities of our learned function approximation. We provide theoretical justifications for such an approach as well as examples of empirical evidence on three distinct domains: regression on classical optimisation datasets, distilling policies of an agent playing Atari, and on large-scale applications of synthetic gradients. In all three domains the use of Sobolev Training, employing target derivatives in addition to target values, results in models with higher accuracy and stronger generalisation. Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, Simon Osindero, Max Jaderberg, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Razvan Pascanu |
NIPS | 4 |
| 2013 | Approximation Algorithms for the Joint Replenishment Problem with Deadlines
Marcin Bienkowski, Jaroslaw Byrka, Marek Chrobak, Neil B. Dobbs, Tomasz Nowicki, Maxim Sviridenko, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Neal E. Young |
ICALP (1) | 7 |
| 2012 | Multi-level Lasso for Sparse Multi-task Regression
Aurélie C. Lozano, Grzegorz Swirszcz |
ICML | 2 |
| 2010 | Medical data mining: insights from winning two competitions
Saharon Rosset, Claudia Perlich, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Prem Melville, Yan Liu 0002 |
Data Min. Knowl. Discov. | 3 |
| 2009 | Grouped Orthogonal Matching Pursuit for Variable Selection and PredictionabstractWe consider the problem of variable group selection for least squares regression, namely, that of selecting groups of variables for best regression performance, leveraging and adhering to a natural grouping structure within the explanatory variables. We show that this problem can be efficiently addressed by using a certain greedy style algorithm. More precisely, we propose the Group Orthogonal Matching Pursuit algorithm (Group-OMP), which extends the standard OMP procedure (also referred to as ``forward greedy feature selection algorithm for least squares regression) to perform stage-wise group variable selection. We prove that under certain conditions Group-OMP can identify the correct (groups of) variables. We also provide an upperbound on the $l_\infty$ norm of the difference between the estimated regression coefficients and the true coefficients. Experimental results on simulated and real world datasets indicate that Group-OMP compares favorably to Group Lasso, OMP and Lasso, both in terms of variable selection and prediction accuracy. Aurélie C. Lozano, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Naoki Abe |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2007 | l1 Regularization in Infinite Dimensional Feature Spaces
Saharon Rosset, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Nathan Srebro |
COLT | 2 |
| 2004 | Maximum Weight Independent Sets and Matchings in Sparse Random Graphs. Exact Results Using the Local Weak Convergence Method
David Gamarnik, Tomasz Nowicki, Grzegorz Swirszcz |
APPROX-RANDOM | 3 |