Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ajeet Shankar
dblp:54/767
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Program analysis · 34% Runtime systems and virtual machines · 20% Program verification · 19% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating systems › resource management
memory management |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Jolt: lightweight dynamic analysis and removal of object churn · OOPSLA 2008 |
Runtime systems and virtual machines › runtime memory management
stack allocation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Jolt: lightweight dynamic analysis and removal of object churn · OOPSLA 2008 |
Program analysis
dynamic analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | DITTO: automatic incrementalization of data structure invariant checks (in Java) · PLDI 2007 |
Program analysis › static analysis
incremental analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | DITTO: automatic incrementalization of data structure invariant checks (in Java) · PLDI 2007 |
Program verification › invariant verification
invariant checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | DITTO: automatic incrementalization of data structure invariant checks (in Java) · PLDI 2007 |
Compilers and program optimization › program specialization
runtime specialization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Runtime specialization with optimistic heap analysis · OOPSLA 2005 |
Program analysis › static analysis › pointer analysis
escape analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Jolt: lightweight dynamic analysis and removal of object churn · OOPSLA 2008 |
Program verification › dynamic verification
runtime verification |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | DITTO: automatic incrementalization of data structure invariant checks (in Java) · PLDI 2007 |
Runtime systems and virtual machines › dynamic compilation
just-in-time compilation |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Runtime specialization with optimistic heap analysis · OOPSLA 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
escape analysis · 0.1dynamic analysis · 0.1source-to-source transformation · 0.1store profiling · 0.1invalidation mechanism · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Jolt: lightweight dynamic analysis and removal of object churnabstractIt has been observed that component-based applications exhibit object churn, the excessive creation of short-lived objects, often caused by trading performance for modularity. Because churned objects are short-lived, they appear to be good candidates for stack allocation. Unfortunately, most churned objects escape their allocating function, making escape analysis ineffective. Ajeet Shankar, Matthew Arnold, Rastislav Bodík |
OOPSLA | 1 |
| 2007 | DITTO: automatic incrementalization of data structure invariant checks (in Java)abstractWe present DITTO, an automatic incrementalizer for dynamic, side-effect-free data structure invariant checks. Incrementalization speeds up the execution of a check by reusing its previous executions, checking the invariant anew only the changed parts of the data structure. DITTO exploits properties specific to the domain of invariant checks to automate and simplify the process without restricting what mutations the program can perform. Our incrementalizer works for modern imperative languages such as Java and C#. It can incrementalize,for example, verification of red-black tree properties and the consistency of the hash code in a hash table bucket. Our source-to-source implementation for Java is automatic, portable, and efficient. DITTO provides speedups on data structures with as few as 100 elements; on larger data structures, its speedups are characteristic of non-automatic incrementalizers: roughly 5-fold at 5,000 elements,and growing linearly with data structure size. Ajeet Shankar, Rastislav Bodík |
PLDI | 1 |
| 2005 | Runtime specialization with optimistic heap analysisabstractWe describe a highly practical program specializer for Java programs. The specializer is powerful, because it specializes optimistically, using (potentially transient) constants in the heap; it is precise, because it specializes using data structures that are only partially invariant; it is deployable, because it is hidden in a JIT compiler and does not require any user annotations or offline preprocessing; it is simple, because it uses existing JIT compiler ingredients; and it is fast, because it specializes programs in under 1s.These properties are the result of (1) a new algorithm for selecting specializable code fragments, based on a notion of influence; (2) a precise store profile for identifying constant heap locations; and (3) an efficient invalidation mechanism for monitoring optimistic assumptions about heap constants. Our implementation of the specializer in the Jikes RVM has low overhead, selects specialization points that would be chosen manually, and produces speedups ranging from a factor of 1.2 to 6.4, comparable with annotation-guided specializers. Ajeet Shankar, S. Subramanya Sastry, Rastislav Bodík, James E. Smith 0001 |
OOPSLA | 1 |