Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gaurav Ajwani

dblp:54/7933 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › physical design › routing › steiner tree construction
obstacle-avoiding rectilinear steiner minimum tree
0.112011
FOARS: FLUTE Based Obstacle-Avoiding Rectilinear Steiner Tree Construction · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.112011
FOARS: FLUTE Based Obstacle-Avoiding Rectilinear Steiner Tree Construction · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011
Electronic design automation › physical design › routing › steiner tree construction
rectilinear steiner tree
0.112011
FOARS: FLUTE Based Obstacle-Avoiding Rectilinear Steiner Tree Construction · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011
Electronic design automation › physical design
routing
0.112011
FOARS: FLUTE Based Obstacle-Avoiding Rectilinear Steiner Tree Construction · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

top-down partitioning · 0.1obstacle-avoiding spanning graph · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 FOARS: FLUTE Based Obstacle-Avoiding Rectilinear Steiner Tree Construction
abstract
In this paper, we present an algorithm called FOARS for obstacle-avoiding rectilinear Steiner minimal tree (OARSMT) construction. FOARS applies a top-down approach which first partitions the set of pins into several subsets uncluttered by obstacles. Then an obstacle-avoiding Steiner tree is generated for each subset by an obstacle aware version of the rectilinear Steiner minimal tree algorithm FLUTE. Finally, the trees are merged and refined to form the OARSMT. To guide the partitioning of pins, we propose a novel algorithm to construct a linear-sized obstacle-avoiding spanning graph which guarantees to contain a rectilinear minimum spanning tree if there is no obstacle. Experimental results show that FOARS is among the best algorithms in terms of both wirelength and runtime for testcases both with and without obstacles.
Gaurav Ajwani, Chris C. N. Chu, Wai-Kei Mak
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
2010 FOARS: FLUTE based obstacle-avoiding rectilinear steiner tree construction
abstract
Obstacle-avoiding rectilinear Steiner minimal tree (OARSMT) construction is becoming one of the most sought after problems in modern design flow. In this paper we present FOARS, an algorithm to route a multi-terminal net in the presence of obstacles. FOARS is a top down approach which includes partitioning the initial solution into subproblems and using obstacle aware version of Fast Lookup Table based Wire-length Estimation (OA-FLUTE) at a lower level to generate an OAST followed by recombining them with some backend refinement. To construct an initial connectivity graph FOARS uses a novel obstacle-avoiding spanning graph (OASG) algorithm which is a generalization of Zhou's spanning graph algorithm without obstacle [1]. FOARS has a run time complexity of O(n log n). Our experimental results indicate that it outperforms Lin et al. [2] by 2.3% in wirelength. FOARS also has 20% faster run time as compared with Long et al. [3], which is the fastest solution till date.
Gaurav Ajwani, Chris C. N. Chu, Wai-Kei Mak
ISPD1