Trung Do Thanh

dblp:54/8367 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 56% Robot manipulation · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
kinematic redundancy
0.112010
Optimization strategies for additional actuators of kinematically redundant parallel kinematic machines · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Robot manipulation
parallel manipulator
0.112010
Optimization strategies for additional actuators of kinematically redundant parallel kinematic machines · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
actuator optimization
0.012010
Optimization strategies for additional actuators of kinematically redundant parallel kinematic machines · ICRA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

discrete optimization · 0.1continuous optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Optimization strategies for additional actuators of kinematically redundant parallel kinematic machines
abstract
In this paper five different optimization strategies for kinematically redundant mechanisms, i.e. mechanisms having additional actuator(s) in at least one kinematic chain, are presented. They are based on two main approaches, a discrete optimization and a classical continuous optimization. Exemplarily, a planar, kinematically redundant 3RRR-based mechanism is introduced. The position of its redundant actuator, i.e. the robot geometry, is optimized according to an optimization criterion that is denoted as the gain of the maximal homogenized pose error. Several analysis examples demonstrate the effectiveness of kinematic redundancy with respect to the introduced optimization procedures. It is shown that in comparison to discrete approaches, classical continuousbased optimization strategies do not necessarily lead to more appropriate results in terms of performance improvement.
Jens Kotlarski, Trung Do Thanh, Bodo Heimann, Tobias Ortmaier
ICRA2