EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher W. Forstall
dblp:55/10255
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining
social media analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Authorship Attribution for Social Media Forensics · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
authorship attribution |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Authorship Attribution for Social Media Forensics · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
digital forensics |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Authorship Attribution for Social Media Forensics · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised learning · 0.6machine learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Authorship Attribution for Social Media ForensicsabstractThe veil of anonymity provided by smartphones with pre-paid SIM cards, public Wi-Fi hotspots, and distributed networks like Tor has drastically complicated the task of identifying users of social media during forensic investigations. In some cases, the text of a single posted message will be the only clue to an author's identity. How can we accurately predict who that author might be when the message may never exceed 140 characters on a service like Twitter? For the past 50 years, linguists, computer scientists, and scholars of the humanities have been jointly developing automated methods to identify authors based on the style of their writing. All authors possess peculiarities of habit that influence the form and content of their written works. These characteristics can often be quantified and measured using machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the methods of authorship attribution that can be applied to the problem of social media forensics. Furthermore, we examine emerging supervised learning-based methods that are effective for small sample sizes, and provide step-by-step explanations for several scalable approaches as instructional case studies for newcomers to the field. We argue that there is a significant need in forensics for new authorship attribution algorithms that can exploit context, can process multi-modal data, and are tolerant to incomplete knowledge of the space of all possible authors at training time. Anderson Rocha 0001, Walter J. Scheirer, Christopher W. Forstall, Thiago Cavalcante, Antonio Theophilo, Bingyu Shen 0001, Ariadne Carvalho, Efstathios Stamatatos |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 3 |