Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marco Valtorta
dblp:55/1665 · also Marco G. Valtorta
· DBLP profile ↗
32ranked-venue papers
10as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-9564-9109ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 28 · 8 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 86% Logic in computer science · 14% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic logic |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A Framework for Integration of Logical and Probabilistic Knowledge · AAAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Identifiability in Causal Bayesian Networks: A Sound and Complete Algorithm · AAAI 2006 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Identifiability in Causal Bayesian Networks: A Sound and Complete Algorithm · AAAI 2006 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › preference handling › preference reasoning
CP-nets |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Identifiability in Causal Bayesian Networks: A Sound and Complete Algorithm · AAAI 2006 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Identifiability in Causal Bayesian Networks: A Sound and Complete Algorithm · AAAI 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.0 | 2 | 2011 | A Framework for Integration of Logical and Probabilistic Knowledge · AAAI 2011 More Results on the Complexity of Knowledge Base Refinement: Belief Networks · ML 1990 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational complexity |
0.0 | 2 | 1990 | More Results on the Complexity of Knowledge Base Refinement: Belief Networks · ML 1990 Some Results on the Complexity of Knowledge-Based Refinement · ML 1989 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge base
knowledge base refinement |
0.0 | 2 | 1990 | More Results on the Complexity of Knowledge Base Refinement: Belief Networks · ML 1990 Some Results on the Complexity of Knowledge-Based Refinement · ML 1989 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
heuristic search |
0.0 | 2 | 1992 | A New Result on the Complexity of Heuristic Estimates for the A* Algorithm · Artif. Intell. 1992 A Result on the Computational Complexity of Heuristic Estimates for the A* Algorithm · IJCAI 1983 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › belief revision
theory revision |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Revision of Reduced Theories · ML 1991 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
ambiguity detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Detecting Ambiguity: An Example in Knowledge Evaluation · IJCAI 1983 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge management
knowledge evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Detecting Ambiguity: An Example in Knowledge Evaluation · IJCAI 1983 |
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms › heuristic search
a* search |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | A Result on the Computational Complexity of Heuristic Estimates for the A* Algorithm · IJCAI 1983 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relation search · 0.1bayesian network composition · 0.1sound and complete algorithm · 0.1computational complexity analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | A decomposition-based algorithm for learning the structure of multivariate regression chain graphs
Mohammad Ali Javidian, Marco Valtorta |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 2 |
| 2020 | Learning LWF Chain Graphs: A Markov Blanket Discovery ApproachabstractThis paper provides a graphical characterization of Markov blankets in chaingraphs (CGs) under the Lauritzen-Wermuth-Frydenberg (LWF) interpretation. The characterization is different from the well-known one for Bayesian networks and generalizes it. We provide a novel scalable and sound algorithmfor Markov blanket discovery in LWF CGs and prove that the Grow-Shrink algorithm, the IAMB algorithm, and its variants are still correct for Markov blanket discovery in LWF CGs under the same assumptions as for Bayesian networks. We provide a sound and scalable constraint-based framework for learning the structure of LWF CGs from faithful causally sufficient data and prove its correctness when the Markov blanket discovery algorithms in this paper are used. Our proposed algorithms compare positively/competitively against the state-of-the-art LCD (Learn Chain graphs via Decomposition) algorithm, depending on the algorithm that is used for Markov blanket discovery. Our proposed algorithms make a broad range of inference/learning problems computationallytractable and more reliable because they exploit locality. Mohammad Ali Javidian, Marco Valtorta, Pooyan Jamshidi |
UAI | 2 |
| 2020 | AMP Chain Graphs: Minimal Separators and Structure Learning AlgorithmsabstractThis paper deals with chain graphs (CGs) under the Andersson–Madigan–Perlman (AMP) interpretation. We address the problem of finding a minimal separator in an AMP CG, namely, finding a set Z of nodes that separates a given non-adjacent pair of nodes such that no proper subset of Z separates that pair. We analyze several versions of this problem and offer polynomial time algorithms for each. These include finding a minimal separator from a restricted set of nodes, finding a minimal separator for two given disjoint sets, and testing whether a given separator is minimal. To address the problem of learning the structure of AMP CGs from data, we show that the PC-like algorithm is order dependent, in the sense that the output can depend on the order in which the variables are given. We propose several modifications of the PC-like algorithm that remove part or all of this order-dependence. We also extend the decomposition-based approach for learning Bayesian networks (BNs) to learn AMP CGs, which include BNs as a special case, under the faithfulness assumption. We prove the correctness of our extension using the minimal separator results. Using standard benchmarks and synthetically generated models and data in our experiments demonstrate the competitive performance of our decomposition-based method, called LCD-AMP, in comparison with the (modified versions of) PC-like algorithm. The LCD-AMP algorithm usually outperforms the PC-like algorithm, and our modifications of the PC-like algorithm learn structures that are more similar to the underlying ground truth graphs than the original PC-like algorithm, especially in high-dimensional settings. In particular, we empirically show that the results of both algorithms are more accurate and stabler when the sample size is reasonably large and the underlying graph is sparse Mohammad Ali Javidian, Marco Valtorta, Pooyan Jamshidi |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 2 |
| 2019 | Detecting Adversarial Attacks in the Context of Bayesian Networks
Emad Alsuwat, Hatim Alsuwat, John R. Rose, Marco Valtorta, Csilla Farkas |
DBSec | 4 |
| 2012 | Using Relative Classification Probability to Increase Accuracy of Restricted Structure Bayesian Network ClassifiersabstractBayesian networks have been used widely in probabilistic representation and reasoning. Meanwhile, it has been shown that Bayesian classifiers are competitive with many state-of-the-art classifiers. In this paper we present an approach that provides a good tradeoff for the Bayesian network classifier between the number of classified instances and classification accuracy, based on a measure of relative classification probability (RCP). Experiments on benchmark datasets show good support for our hypothesis. The same classifier could reach much higher accuracy over a subset of the original dataset. For most datasets, classification accuracy of the same classifiers can rise high without excluding many instances. The empirical study shows that this idea works well especially for the multiclass classification case. Jingsong Wang, Marco Valtorta |
ICTAI | 2 |
| 2012 | On the combination of logical and probabilistic models for information analysis
Jingsong Wang, John J. Byrnes, Marco Valtorta, Michael N. Huhns |
Appl. Intell. | 3 |
| 2011 | A Framework for Integration of Logical and Probabilistic KnowledgeabstractIntegrating the expressive power of first-order logic with the ability of probabilistic reasoning of Bayesian networks has attracted the interest of many researchers for decades. We present an approach to integration that translates logical knowledge into Bayesian networks and uses Bayesian network composition to build a uniform representation that supports both logical and probabilistic reasoning. In particular, we propose a new way of translation of logical knowledge, relation search. Through the use of the proposed framework, without learning new languages or tools, modelers are allowed to 1) specify special knowledge using the most suitable languages, while reasoning in a uniform engine; 2) make use of pre-existing logical knowledge bases for probabilistic reasoning (to complete the model or minimize potential inconsistencies). Jingsong Wang, Marco Valtorta |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2008 | Identifiability in Causal Bayesian Networks: a Gentle IntroductionabstractIn this article we describe an important structure used to model causal theories and a related problem of great interest to semi-empirical scientists. A causal Bayesian network is a pair consisting of a directed acyclic graph (called a causal graph) that represents causal relationships and a set of probability tables, that together with the graph specify the joint probability of the variables represented as nodes in the graph. We briefly describe the probabilistic semantics of causality proposed by Pearl for this graphical probabilistic model, and how unobservable variables greatly complicate models and their application. A common question about causal Bayesian networks is the problem of identifying causal effects from nonexperimental data, which is called the identifability problem. In the basic version of this problem, a semi-empirical scientist postulates a set of causal mechanisms and uses them, together with a probability distribution on the observable set of variables in a domain of interest, to predict the effect of a manipulation on some variable of interest. We explain this problem, provide several examples, and direct the readers to recent work that provides a solution to the problem and some of its extensions. We assume that the Bayesian network structure is given to us and do not address the problem of learning it from data and the related statistical inference and testing issues. Marco Valtorta |
Cybern. Syst. | 1 |
| 2006 | Identifiability in Causal Bayesian Networks: A Sound and Complete Algorithm
Marco Valtorta |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2006 | Pearl's Calculus of Intervention Is Complete
Marco Valtorta |
UAI | 2 |
| 2005 | Building Bayesian Network Models in Medicine: The MENTOR Experience
Subramani Mani, Marco Valtorta, Suzanne McDermott |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 2005 | PAID: A Probabilistic Agent-Based Intrusion Detection system
Vaibhav Gowadia, Csilla Farkas, Marco Valtorta |
Comput. Secur. | 3 |
| 2004 | A Prototypical System for Soft Evidential Update
Young-Gyun Kim, Marco Valtorta, Jirí Vomlel |
Appl. Intell. | 2 |
| 2004 | Sequential And Parallel Algorithms For Causal Explanation With Background KnowledgeabstractThis paper presents a new sequential algorithm to answer the question about the existence of a causal explanation for a set of independence statements (a dependency model), which is consistent with a given set of background knowledge. Emphasis is placed on generality, efficiency and ease of parallelization of the algorithm. From this sequential algorithm, an efficient, scalable, and easy to implement parallel algorithm with very little inter-processor communication is derived. Bhaskara Reddy Moole, Marco Valtorta |
Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |
| 2002 | Soft evidential update for probabilistic multiagent systems
Marco Valtorta, Young-Gyun Kim, Jirí Vomlel |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 1 |
| 1998 | A Hybrid Algorithm to Compute Marginal and Joint Beliefs in Bayesian Networks and Its Complexity
Mark Bloemeke, Marco Valtorta |
UAI | 2 |
| 1995 | On the Detection of Conflicts in Diagnostic Bayesian Networks Using Abstraction
Young-Gyun Kim, Marco Valtorta |
UAI | 2 |
| 1995 | Refinement of Uncertain Rule Bases via Reduction
Charles Ling 0001, Marco Valtorta |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 2 |
| 1995 | Construction of Bayesian network structures from data: A brief survey and an efficient algorithm
Moninder Singh, Marco Valtorta |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 2 |
| 1993 | An Algorithm for the Construction of Bayesian Network Structures from Data
Moninder Singh, Marco Valtorta |
UAI | 2 |
| 1992 | A New Result on the Complexity of Heuristic Estimates for the A* Algorithm
Othar Hansson, Andrew Mayer, Marco Valtorta |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 1992 | Statistical consistency with Dempster's rule on diagnostic trees having uncertain performance parameters
Stephen D. Durham, Jeffery S. Smolka, Marco Valtorta |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 3 |
| 1992 | On the complexity of belief network synthesis and refinement
Marco Valtorta, Donald W. Loveland |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 1 |
| 1991 | Revision of Reduced Theories
Xiaofeng Ling, Marco Valtorta |
ML | 2 |
| 1991 | Knowledge base refinement: A bibliography
Marco Valtorta |
Appl. Intell. | 1 |
| 1991 | Some results on the computational complexity of refining confidence factors
Marco Valtorta |
Int. J. Approx. Reason. | 1 |
| 1990 | More Results on the Complexity of Knowledge Base Refinement: Belief Networks
Marco Valtorta |
ML | 1 |
| 1989 | Some Results on the Complexity of Knowledge-Based Refinement
Marco Valtorta |
ML | 1 |
| 1988 | Automating Rule Strengths in Expert Systems
Marco Valtorta |
ECAI | 1 |
| 1984 | A result on the computational complexity of heuristic estimates for the A algorithm
Marco Valtorta |
Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 1983 | Detecting Ambiguity: An Example in Knowledge Evaluation
Donald W. Loveland, Marco Valtorta |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 1983 | A Result on the Computational Complexity of Heuristic Estimates for the A* Algorithm
Marco Valtorta |
IJCAI | 1 |