Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Clark Jeffries

dblp:55/2152 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0002-3044-2649ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network performance modeling · 50% Network optimization and economics · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network optimization and economics › game theory › routing game
braess paradox
0.011997
Congestion resulting from increased capacity in single-server queueing networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1997
Network performance modeling
queueing network model
0.011997
Congestion resulting from increased capacity in single-server queueing networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

queueing theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Secure remote user access over insecure networks
Mohammad Peyravian, Clark Jeffries
Comput. Commun.2
2001 Two tools for network traffic analysis
M. Ayedemir, Laura Bottomley, Marie Coffin, Clark Jeffries, Peter C. Kiessler, W. Ligon, J. Marin, Arne A. Nilsson, J. McGovern, Andrew J. Rindos, Ken V. Vu, Steven P. Woolet, A. Zaglou
Comput. Networks4
1997 Congestion resulting from increased capacity in single-server queueing networks
abstract
In many networks for traffic and telecommunications, minimizing delays from entry to exit is a major concern of users. In user-optimal routing, each user chooses a path to minimize delay from entry to exit, given the existing paths chosen by all other users. Under user-optimal routing, at equilibrium all users experience the same delay. Many networks, especially data networks, are commonly modeled as networks of single-server queues. We report examples of single-server queueing networks with user-optimal routing in which adding servers or increasing the capacity of existing servers worsens the delay experienced by all users.
Joel E. Cohen, Clark Jeffries
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.2
1988 A qualitative analysis of I
Terrence Bone, Clark Jeffries, Victor Klee
Discret. Appl. Math.2