Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elsie Nallipogu

dblp:55/2351 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 33% Software maintenance and evolution · 33% Software testing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair
0.912025
SWE-bench Goes Live! · NeurIPS 2025
Software testing › test infrastructure
benchmark construction
0.912025
SWE-bench Goes Live! · NeurIPS 2025
Software maintenance and evolution › issue management
issue resolution
0.912025
SWE-bench Goes Live! · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9agent framework · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SWE-bench Goes Live!
abstract
The issue-resolving task, where a model generates patches to fix real-world bugs, has emerged as a key benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While SWE-bench has become the dominant benchmark in this domain, it suffers from several limitations: it has not been updated since its release, is restricted to only 12 repositories, and relies heavily on manual effort for constructing test instances and setting up executable environments, significantly limiting its scalability. We present SWE-bench-Live, a live-updatable benchmark designed to address these limitations. SWE-bench-Live currently includes 1,890 tasks derived from real GitHub issues created since 2024, spanning 223 repositories. Each task is accompanied by a dedicated Docker image to ensure reproducible execution. Additionally, we introduce an automated curation pipeline that streamlines the entire process from instance creation to environment setup, removing manual bottlenecks and enabling scalability and continuous updates. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models and agent frameworks on SWE-bench-Live, offering detailed empirical insights into their real-world bug-fixing capabilities. By providing a fresh, diverse, and executable benchmark grounded in live repository activity, SWE-bench-Live supports reliable, large-scale assessment of code LLMs and code agents in realistic development settings.
Linghao Zhang, Shilin He, Chaoyun Zhang, Yu Kang 0006, Bowen Li 0002, Chengxing Xie, Maoquan Wang, Yufan Huang, Shengyu Fu, Elsie Nallipogu, Qingwei Lin, Yingnong Dang, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang 0001
NeurIPS11