Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Bodo Hoppe

dblp:55/2587 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 76% Electronic design automation · 19% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 6%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault injection
0.112010
Verification for fault tolerance of the IBM system z microprocessor · DAC 2010
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault tolerance verification
0.112010
Verification for fault tolerance of the IBM system z microprocessor · DAC 2010
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.112010
Verification for fault tolerance of the IBM system z microprocessor · DAC 2010
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.112010
Verification for fault tolerance of the IBM system z microprocessor · DAC 2010
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
soft error resilience
0.112010
Verification for fault tolerance of the IBM system z microprocessor · DAC 2010
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprocessor
0.012010
Verification for fault tolerance of the IBM system z microprocessor · DAC 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault injection · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Verification for fault tolerance of the IBM system z microprocessor
abstract
IBM System z processors are known for their industry leading Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS). The hardware is designed to support a high resilience against errors and the ability to recover from errors maintaining a valid architectural state. This paper describes the thorough verification effort required to prove that the fault tolerance of the IBM System z processor core matches the high expectations prior to design tape-out. This paper proposes a multifaceted verification methodology to cover the various aspects of verifying correct error detection, isolation and recovery. Soft errors enlarge the state space of a design significantly. This provides a significant challenge to the functional verification environment in order to tolerate the fails and to expect architectural compliance. Several fault injection mechanisms are discussed. A special focus is on the novel methodology of Comprehensive Fault Injection (CFI) used to validate and improve the dependability characteristics of the processor core, providing improved Soft Error Resilience (SER). Feedback of the results and measurements of the efficiency and functional coverage are an integral part of the overall methodology, allowing the smart use of the available compute resources.
Brian W. Thompto, Bodo Hoppe
DAC2
2003 A Tool-Set for Table Based Direct Behavioral Configuration of C++ Models
Christoph Jaeschke, Bodo Hoppe, Wolfram Sauer
FDL2