Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marta Franová

dblp:55/2719 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 5 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving
0.021991
Solving "How to Clear a Block" with Constructive Matching Methodology · IJCAI 1991
CM-Strategy: A Methodology for Inductive Theorem Proving or Constructive Well-Generalized Proofs · IJCAI 1985
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › classical planning
blocks world
0.011991
Solving "How to Clear a Block" with Constructive Matching Methodology · IJCAI 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning
0.011991
Solving "How to Clear a Block" with Constructive Matching Methodology · IJCAI 1991
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
inductive theorem proving
0.011985
CM-Strategy: A Methodology for Inductive Theorem Proving or Constructive Well-Generalized Proofs · IJCAI 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constructive matching · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 On Computational Creativity, 'Inventing' Theorem Proofs
Marta Franová, Yves Kodratoff
ISMIS1
1996 Automated Inductive Reasoning as a Support of Deductive Reasoning in a User-Independent Automation of Inductive Theorem Proving
Marta Franová
ISMIS1
1993 Constructive Matching Methodology: Formally Creative or Intelligent Inductive Theorem Proving?
Marta Franová, Yves Kodratoff, Martine Gross
ISMIS1
1992 Predicate Synthesis from Formal Specifications
Marta Franová, Yves Kodratoff
ECAI1
1991 Solving "How to Clear a Block" with Constructive Matching Methodology
Marta Franová, Yves Kodratoff
IJCAI1
1990 PRECOMAS an Implementation of Constructive Matching Methodology
abstract
The system PRECOMAS (PRoofs Educed by COnstructive MAtching for Synthesis) implements the Constructive Matching methodology for automatic constructions of programs from formal specifications.In this paper we describe briefly the goal of PRECOMAS, its logical background and the CM method applied to proving atomic formulae. We show how the user of our system is involved in solving a program synthesis problem. We show that this interaction does not concern the problem of guiding the program synthesis process, this being solved by CM. Our experimental version serves to confirm that the system is worth to be developed.
Marta Franová
ISSAC1
1988 An Implementation of Program Synthesis from Formal Specifications: PRECOMAS
Marta Franová
ECAI1
1988 Fundamentals for a New Methodology for Inductive Theorem Proving: CM-Construction of Atomic Formulae
Marta Franová
ECAI1
1985 CM-Strategy: A Methodology for Inductive Theorem Proving or Constructive Well-Generalized Proofs
Marta Franová
IJCAI1