Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James E. McDonald

dblp:55/32 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 6 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
5 papers
User interface design and tools · 68% Interaction techniques and input · 28% Usability and user experience research · 4%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools
interface prototyping
0.011988
The Mirage Rapid Interface Prototyping System · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 1988
User interface design and tools
menu design
0.011988
Color-coding categories in menus · CHI 1988
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge elicitation
0.011987
The Application of Psychological Scaling Techniques to Knowledge Elicitation for Knowledge-Based Systems · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1987
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
expert knowledge elicitation
0.011986
A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge · Proc. IEEE 1986
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge acquisition
0.011986
A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge · Proc. IEEE 1986
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
semantic networks
0.011986
A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge · Proc. IEEE 1986
User interface design and tools › user interface design
interface design methodology
0.011986
A formal interface design methodology based on user knowledge · CHI 1986
Interaction techniques and input › selection techniques › command selection › menu interaction
menu technique
0.011986
A Comparison of Menu Selection Techniques: Touch Panel, Mouse and Keyboard · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1986
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge-based systems
0.011987
The Application of Psychological Scaling Techniques to Knowledge Elicitation for Knowledge-Based Systems · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1987
Usability and user experience research
cognitive modeling
0.011986
A formal interface design methodology based on user knowledge · CHI 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

protocol analysis · 0.0interviews · 0.0cognitive psychology techniques · 0.0rapid prototyping · 0.0controlled study · 0.0psychological scaling · 0.0pathfinder network analysis · 0.0multidimensional scaling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 Providing machine tractable dictionary tools
Yorick Wilks, Dan Fass, Cheng-ming Guo, James E. McDonald, Tony Plate, Brian M. Slator
Mach. Transl.4
1988 Color-coding categories in menus
abstract
Categorical menu layouts are currently designed according to conventions and opinions, rather than by employing formal techniques. In this paper we describe a formal methodology for categorically organizing menus. We go on to show how color-coding can be applied to these layouts either to emphasize organization or to provide additional information. The results of a controlled study comparing layouts based on frequency of co-occurrence and similarity show that the formal menu-layout methodology is effective. However, the use of color-coding to identify categories is not supported. Potential reasons for this failure are discussed.
James E. McDonald, Mark E. Molander, Ronald W. Noel
CHI1
1988 Machine tractable dictionaries as tools and resources for NL prosessing
Yorick Wilks, Dan Fass, Cheng-ming Guo, James E. McDonald, Tony Plate, Brian M. Slator
COLING4
1988 The Mirage Rapid Interface Prototyping System
abstract
Article Free Access Share on The mirage rapid interface prototyping system Authors: James E. McDonald Computing Research Lab, New Mexico State University, Box 30001/3CRL, Las Cruces, New Mexico and Digital Subsystems II, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico Computing Research Lab, New Mexico State University, Box 30001/3CRL, Las Cruces, New Mexico and Digital Subsystems II, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New MexicoView Profile , Paul D. J. Vandenberg Computing Research Lab, New Mexico State University, Box 30001/3CRL, Las Cruces, New Mexico and Digital Subsystems II, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico Computing Research Lab, New Mexico State University, Box 30001/3CRL, Las Cruces, New Mexico and Digital Subsystems II, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New MexicoView Profile , Melissa J. Smartt Computing Research Lab, New Mexico State University, Box 30001/3CRL, Las Cruces, New Mexico and Digital Subsystems II, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico Computing Research Lab, New Mexico State University, Box 30001/3CRL, Las Cruces, New Mexico and Digital Subsystems II, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New MexicoView Profile Authors Info & Claims UIST '88: Proceedings of the 1st annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on User Interface SoftwareJanuary 1988Pages 77–84https://doi.org/10.1145/62402.62414Published:03 January 1988Publication History 1citation457DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations1Total Downloads457Last 12 Months43Last 6 weeks4 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Publisher SiteeReaderPDF
James E. McDonald, Paul D. J. Vandenberg, Melissa J. Smartt
ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology1
1988 Adapting Menu Layout to Tasks
James E. McDonald, Tom Dayton, Deborah R. McDonald
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.1
1987 The Application of Psychological Scaling Techniques to Knowledge Elicitation for Knowledge-Based Systems
Nancy M. Cooke, James E. McDonald
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.2
1986 A formal interface design methodology based on user knowledge
abstract
In this paper we propose a formal interface design methodology based on user knowledge. The general methodology consists of 1) obtaining distance estimates for pairs of system units (objects, actions, concepts), 2) transforming the distance estimates using scaling techniques (e.g., Pathfinder network analysis), and 3) organizing the system interface based on the scaling solution. Thus, the organization of the system is based on the cognitive models of users rather than the intuitions of designers. As an example, we discuss the application of our methodology to the design of a network-based indexing aid for the UNIX on-line documentation system (MAN).
James E. McDonald, Donald W. Dearholt, Ken Paap, Roger W. Schvaneveldt
CHI1
1986 A Comparison of Menu Selection Techniques: Touch Panel, Mouse and Keyboard
John Karat, James E. McDonald, Matthew P. Anderson
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.2
1986 A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge
abstract
The process of eliciting knowledge from human experts and representing that knowledge in an expert or knowledge-based system suffers from numerous problems. Not only is this process time-consuming and tedious, but the weak knowledge acquisition methods typically used (i.e., interviews and protocol analysis) are inadequate for eliciting tacit knowledge and may, in fact, lead to inaccuracies in the knowledge base. In addition, the intended knowledge representation scheme guides the acquisition of knowledge resulting in a representation-driven knowledge base as opposed to one that is knowledge-driven. In this paper, a formal methodology is proposed that employs techniques from the field of cognitive psychology to uncover expert knowledge as well as an appropriate representation of that knowledge. The advantages of such a methodology are discussed, as well as results from studies concerning the elicitation of concepts from experts and the assignment of labels to links in empirically derived semantic networks.
Nancy M. Cooke, James E. McDonald
Proc. IEEE2