The FAIR principles for scientific data (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) are also relevant to other digital objects such as research software and scientific workflows that operate on scientific data. The FAIR principles can be applied to the data being handled by a scientific workflow as well as the processes, software, and other infrastructure which are necessary to specify and execute a workflow. The FAIR principles were designed as guidelines, rather than rules, that would allow for differences in standards for different communities and for different degrees of compliance. There are many practical considerations which impact the level of FAIR-ness that can actually be achieved, including policies, traditions, and technologies. Because of these considerations, obstacles are often encountered during the workflow lifecycle that trace directly to shortcomings in the implementation of the FAIR principles. Here, we detail some cases, without naming names, in which data and workflows were Findable but otherwise lacking in areas commonly needed and expected by modern FAIR methods, tools, and users. We describe how some of these problems, all of which were overcome successfully, have motivated us to push on systems and approaches for fully FAIR workflows.

Abstract Science applications preparing for the exascale era are increasingly exploring in situ computations comprising of simulation‐analysis‐reduction pipelines coupled in‐memory. Efficient composition and execution of such complex pipelines for a target platform is a codesign process that evaluates the impact and tradeoffs of various application‐ and system‐specific parameters. In this article, we describe a toolset for automating performance studies of composed HPC applications that perform online data reduction and analysis. We describe Cheetah, a new framework for composing parametric studies on coupled applications, and Savanna, a runtime engine for orchestrating and executing campaigns of codesign experiments. This toolset facilitates understanding the impact of various factors such as process placement, synchronicity of algorithms, and storage versus compute requirements for online analysis of large data. Ultimately, we aim to create a catalog of performance results that can help scientists understand tradeoffs when designing next‐generation simulations that make use of online processing techniques. We illustrate the design of Cheetah and Savanna, and present application examples that use this framework to conduct codesign studies on small clusters as well as leadership class supercomputers.

Reusing data is difficult even within well-defined science communities and only gets worse when combining data from multiple communities and disciplines. Through the lens of current work on constructing an environmental epidemiological data set from multiple disciplinary sources, we demonstrate the need for a new tool ecosystem to support heterogeneous Big Data science. Extending existing community standards for schemas and/or data formats through human auditing and wrangling of the data is not feasible at scale. This work therefore suggests new approaches for the multi-disciplinary communities to build a shared tool ecosystem for big data. We discuss both the larger context of data wrangling of epidemiological data sets for novel artificial intelligence algorithms and the specific lessons from working with these multi-disciplinary data sets. Adopting a more model-driven, automatable approach promises not only better efficiency but also removes key sources of human-generated errors and promotes reuse and reproducibility of science data.

The FAIR principles of open science (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) have had transformative effects on modern large-scale computational science. In particular, they have encouraged more open access to and use of data, an important consideration as collaboration among teams of researchers accelerates and the use of workflows by those teams to solve problems increases. How best to apply the FAIR principles to workflows themselves, and software more generally, is not yet well understood. We argue that the software engineering concept of technical debt management provides a useful guide for application of those principles to workflows, and in particular that it implies reusability should be considered as ‘first among equals’. Moreover, our approach recognizes a continuum of reusability where we can make explicit and selectable the tradeoffs required in workflows for both their users and developers.To this end, we propose a new abstraction approach for reusable workflows, with demonstrations for both synthetic workloads and real-world computational biology workflows. Through application of novel systems and tools that are based on this abstraction, these experimental workflows are refactored to rightsize the granularity of workflow components to efficiently fill the gap between end-user simplicity and general customizability. Our work makes it easier to selectively reason about and automate the connections between trade-offs across user and developer concerns when exposing degrees of freedom for reuse. Additionally, by exposing fine-grained reusability abstractions we enable performance optimizations, as we demonstrate on both institutional-scale and leadership-class HPC resources.

Part of the promise of exascale computing and the next generation of scientific simulation codes is the ability to bring together time and spatial scales that have traditionally been treated separately. This enables creating complex coupled simulations and in situ analysis pipelines, encompassing such things as "whole device" fusion models or the simulation of cities from sewers to rooftops. Unfortunately, the HPC analysis tools that have been built up over the preceding decades are ill suited to the debugging and performance analysis of such computational ensembles. In this paper, we present a new vision for performance measurement and understanding of HPC codes, MonitoringAnalytics (MONA). MONA is designed to be a flexible, high performance monitoring infrastructure that can perform monitoring analysis in place or in transit by embedding analytics and characterization directly into the data stream, without relying upon delivering all monitoring information to a central database for post-processing. It addresses the trade-offs between the prohibitively expensive capture of all performance characteristics and not capturing enough to detect the features of interest. We demonstrate several uses of MONA; capturing and indexing multi-executable performance profiles to enable later processing, extraction of performance primitives to enable the generation of customizable benchmarks and performance skeletons, and extracting communication and application behaviors to enable better control and placement for the current and future runs of the science ensemble. Relevant performance information based on a system for MONA built from ADIOS and SOSflow technologies is provided for DOE science applications and leadership machines.

Scientific data collections grow ever larger, both in terms of the size of individual data items and of the number and complexity of items. To use and manage them, it is important to directly address issues of robust and actionable provenance. We identify three key drivers as our focus: managing the size and complexity of metadata, lack of a priori information to match usage intents between publishers and consumers of data, and support for campaigns over collections of data driven by multi-disciplinary, collaborating teams. We introduce the Hoarde abstraction as an attempt to formalize a way of looking at collections of data to make them more tractable for later use. Hoarde leverages middleware and systems infrastructures for scientific and technical data management. Through the lens of a select group of challenging data usage scenarios, we discuss some of the aspects of implementation, usage, and forward portability of this new view on data management.

For a production high-performance computing (HPC) system, where storage devices are shared between multiple applications and managed in a best effort manner, I/O contention is often a major problem. In this paper, we propose a balanced messaging-based re-routing in conjunction with throttling at the middleware level. This work tackles two key challenges that have not been fully resolved in the past: whether I/O variability can be reduced on a QoS-less HPC storage system, and how to design a runtime scheduling system that can scale up to a large amount of cores. The proposed scheme uses a two-level messaging system to re-route I/O requests to a less congested storage location so that write performance is improved, while limiting the impact on read by throttling re-routing. An analytical model is derived to guide the setup of optimal throttling factor. We thoroughly analyze the virtual messaging layer overhead and explore whether the in-transit buffering is effective in managing I/O variability. Contrary to the intuition, in-transit buffer cannot completely solve the problem. It can reduce the absolute variability but not the relative variability. The proposed scheme is verified against a synthetic benchmark as well as being used by production applications.

As a result of increasing data volume and velocity, Big Data science at exascale has shifted towards the in-situ paradigm, where large scale simulations run concurrently alongside data analytics. With in-situ, data generated from simulations can be processed while still in memory, thereby avoiding the slow storage bottleneck. However, running simulations and analytics together on shared resources will likely result in substantial contention if left unmanaged, as demonstrated in this work, leading to much reduced efficiency of simulations and analytics. Recently, virtualization technologies such as Linux containers have been widely applied to data centers and physical clusters to provide highly efficient and elastic resource provisioning for consolidated workloads including scientific simulations and data analytics. In this paper, we investigate to facilitate network traffic manipulation and reduce mutual interference on the network for in-situ applications in virtual clusters. In order to dynamically allocate the network bandwidth when it is needed, we adopt SARIMA-based techniques to analyze and predict MPI traffic issued from simulations. Although this can be an effective technique, the naïve usage of network virtualization can lead to performance degradation for bursty asynchronous transmissions within an MPI job. We analyze and resolve this performance degradation in virtual clusters.

With the growing computational complexity of science and the complexity of new and emerging hardware, it is time to re-evaluate the traditional monolithic design of computational codes. One new paradigm is constructing larger scientific computational experiments from the coupling of multiple individual scientific applications, each targeting their own physics, characteristic lengths, and/or scales. We present a framework constructed by leveraging capabilities such as in-memory communications, workflow scheduling on HPC resources, and continuous performance monitoring. This code coupling capability is demonstrated by a fusion science scenario, where differences between the plasma at the edges and at the core of a device have different physical descriptions. This infrastructure not only enables the coupling of the physics components, but it also connects in situ or online analysis, compression, and visualization that accelerate the time between a run and the analysis of the science content. Results from runs on Titan and Cori are presented as a demonstration.

One of the core issues across computer and computational science today is adapting to, managing, and learning from the influx of "Big Data". In the commercial space, this problem has led to a huge investment in new technologies and capabilities that are well adapted to dealing with the sorts of human-generated logs, videos, texts, and other large-data artifacts that are processed and resulted in an explosion of useful platforms and languages (Hadoop, Spark, Pandas, etc.). However, translating this work from the enterprise space to the computational science and HPC community has proven somewhat difficult, in part because of some of the fundamental differences in type and scale of data and timescales surrounding its generation and use. We describe a forward-looking research and development plan which centers around the concept of making Input/Output (I/O) intelligent for users in the scientific community, whether they are accessing scalable storage or performing in situ workflow tasks. Much of our work is based on our experience with the Adaptable I/O System (ADIOS 1.X), and our next generation version of the software ADIOS 2.X [1].

Task mapping is an important problem in parallel and distributed computing. The goal in task mapping is to find an optimal layout of the processes of an application (or a task) onto a given network topology. We target this problem in the context of staging applications. A staging application consists of two or more parallel applications (also referred to as staging tasks) which run concurrently and exchange data over the course of computation. Task mapping becomes a more challenging problem in staging applications, because not only data is exchanged between the staging tasks, but also the processes of a staging task may exchange data with each other. We propose a novel method, called Task Graph Embedding (TGE), that harnesses the observable graph structures of parallel applications and network topologies. TGE employs a machine learning based algorithm to find the best representation of a graph, called an embedding, onto a space in which the task-to-processor mapping problem can be solved. We evaluate and demonstrate the effectiveness of TGE experimentally with the communication patterns extracted from runs of XGC, a large-scale fusion simulation code, on Titan.

As the memory and storage hierarchy get deeper and more complex, it is important to have new benchmarks and evaluation tools that allow us to explore the emerging middleware solutions to use this hierarchy. Skel is a tool aimed at automating and refining this process of studying HPC I/O performance. It works by generating application I/O kernel/benchmarks as determined by a domain-specific model. This paper provides some techniques for extending Skel to address new situations and to answer new research questions. For example, we document use cases as diverse as using Skel to troubleshoot I/O performance issues for remote users, refining an I/O system model, and facilitating the development and testing of a mechanism for runtime monitoring and performance analytics. We also discuss data oriented extensions to Skel to support the study of compression techniques for Exascale scientific data management.

As we continue toward exascale, scientific data volume is continuing to scale and becoming more burdensome to manage. In this paper, we lay out opportunities to enhance state of the art data management techniques. We emphasize well-principled data compression, and using it to achieve progressive refinement. This can both accelerate I/O and afford the user increased flexibility when she interacts with the data. The formulation naturally maps onto enabling partitioning of the progressively improving-quality representations of a data quantity into different media-type destinations, to keep the highest priority information as close as possible to the computation, and take advantage of deepening memory/storage hierarchies in ways not previously possible. Careful monitoring is requisite to our vision, not only to verify that compression has not eliminated salient features in the data, but also to better understand the performance of massively parallel scientific applications. Increased mathematical rigor would be ideal,to help bring compression on a better-understood theoretical footing, closer to the relevant scientific theory, more aware of constraints imposed by the science, and more tightly error-controlled. Throughout, we highlight pathfinding research we have begun exploring related these topics, and comment toward future work that will be needed.

Parallel application benchmarks are indispensable for evaluating/optimizing HPC software and hardware. However, it is very challenging and costly to obtain high-fidelity benchmarks reflecting the scale and complexity of state-of-the-art parallel applications. Hand-extracted synthetic benchmarks are time- and labor-intensive to create. Real applications themselves, while offering most accurate performance evaluation, are expensive to compile, port, recon- figure, and often plainly inaccessible due to security or ownership concerns. This work contributes APPRIME, a novel tool for trace-based automatic parallel benchmark generation. Taking as input standard communication-I/O traces of an application’s execution, it couples accurate automatic phase identification with statistical regeneration of event parameters to create compact, portable, and to some degree reconfigurable parallel application benchmarks. Experiments with four NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) and three real scientific simulation codes confirm the fidelity of APPRIME benchmarks. They retain the original applications’ performance characteristics, in particular the relative performance across platforms.

Parallel application benchmarks are indispensable for evaluating/optimizing HPC software and hardware. However, it is very challenging and costly to obtain high-fidelity benchmarks reflecting the scale and complexity of state-of-the-art parallel applications. Hand-extracted synthetic benchmarks are time- and labor-intensive to create. Real applications themselves, while offering most accurate performance evaluation, are expensive to compile, port, reconfigure, and often plainly inaccessible due to security or ownership concerns. This work contributes APPrime, a novel tool for trace-based automatic parallel benchmark generation. Taking as input standard communication-I/O traces of an application's execution, it couples accurate automatic phase identification with statistical regeneration of event parameters to create compact, portable, and to some degree reconfigurable parallel application benchmarks. Experiments with four NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) and three real scientific simulation codes confirm the fidelity of APPrime benchmarks. They retain the original applications' performance characteristics, in particular their relative performance across platforms. Also, the result benchmarks, already released online, are much more compact and easy-to-port compared to the original applications.

SUMMARY Applications running on leadership platforms are more and more bottlenecked by storage input/output (I/O). In an effort to combat the increasing disparity between I/O throughput and compute capability, we created Adaptable IO System (ADIOS) in 2005. Focusing on putting users first with a service oriented architecture, we combined cutting edge research into new I/O techniques with a design effort to create near optimal I/O methods. As a result, ADIOS provides the highest level of synchronous I/O performance for a number of mission critical applications at various Department of Energy Leadership Computing Facilities. Meanwhile ADIOS is leading the push for next generation techniques including staging and data processing pipelines. In this paper, we describe the startling observations we have made in the last half decade of I/O research and development, and elaborate the lessons we have learned along this journey. We also detail some of the challenges that remain as we look toward the coming Exascale era. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The remote visual exploration of live data generated by scientific simulations is useful for scientific discovery, performance monitoring, and online validation for the simulation results. Online visualization methods are challenged, however, by the continued growth in the volume of simulation output data that has to be transferred from its source - the simulation running on the high end machine - to where it is analyzed, visualized, and displayed. A specific challenge in this context is limits in the communication bandwidth between data source(s) and sinks. Previous work places queries `near' data sources, exploiting their data reduction capabilities, but such work does not address the common scenario in which scientists make multiple different queries on the data being produced. This paper considers the general case in which science users are interested in different (sub)sets of the data produced by a high end simulation. We offer the FlexQuery online data query system that can deploy and execute data queries `along' the I/O and analytics pipelines. FlexQuery carefully extends such analytics pipelines, using online performance monitoring and data location tracking, to realize data queries in ways that minimize additional data movement and offer low latency in data query execution. Using a real-world scientific application - the Maya astrophysics code and its analytics workflow - we demonstrate FlexQuery's ability to dynamically deploy queries for low-latency remote data visualization.

Efficiently studying Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) molecules' formations in the presence of different molar concentrations on high-end GPU clusters whose nodes share accelerators exposes us to several challenges, including the need to dynamically adapt the job lengths. Neither virtualization nor lightweight OS solutions can easily support generality, portability, and maintainability in concert. Our solution complements rather than rewrites existing workflow and resource managers with a companion module that complements functions of the workflow manager and a wrapper module that extends functions of the resource managers. Results on the Keene land cluster show how, by using our modules, accelerated SDS simulations more efficiently use the cluster's GPUs while leading to relevant scientific observations.

Scientific communities have benefitted from a significant increase of available computing and storage resources in the last few decades. For science projects that have access to leadership scale computing resources, the capacity to produce data has been growing exponentially. Teams working on such projects must now include, in addition to the traditional application scientists, experts in various disciplines including applied mathematicians for development of algorithms, visualization specialists for large data, and I/O specialists. Sharing of knowledge and data is becoming a requirement for scientific discovery, providing useful mechanisms to facilitate this sharing is a key challenge for e-Science. Our hypothesis is that in order to decrease the time to solution for application scientists we need to lower the barrier of entry into related computing fields. We aim at improving users' experience when interacting with a vast software ecosystem and/or huge amount of data, while maintaining focus on their primary research field. In this context we present our approach to bridge the gap between the application scientists and the visualization experts through a visualization schema as a first step and proof of concept for a new way to look at interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists dealing with big data. The key to our approach is recognizing that our users are scientists who mostly work as islands. They tend to work in very specialized environment but occasionally have to collaborate with other researchers in order to take full advantage of computing innovations and get insight from big data. We present an example of identifying the connecting elements between one of such relationships and offer a liaison schema to facilitate their collaboration.

In the era of petascale computing, more scientific applications are being deployed on leadership scale computing platforms to enhance the scientific productivity. Many I/O techniques have been designed to address the growing I/O bottleneck on large-scale systems by handling massive scientific data in a holistic manner. While such techniques have been leveraged in a wide range of applications, they have not been shown as adequate for many mission critical applications, particularly in data postprocessing stage. One of the examples is that some scientific applications generate datasets composed of a vast amount of small data elements that are organized along many spatial and temporal dimensions but require sophisticated data analytics on one or more dimensions. Including such dimensional knowledge into data organization can be beneficial to the efficiency of data post-processing, which is often missing from exiting I/O techniques. In this study, we propose a novel I/O scheme named STAR (Spatial and Temporal AggRegation) to enable high performance data queries for scientific analytics. STAR is able to dive into the massive data, identify the spatial and temporal relationships among data variables, and accordingly organize them into an optimized multi-dimensional data structure before storing to the storage. This technique not only facilitates the common access patterns of data analytics, but also further reduces the application turnaround time. In particular, STAR is able to enable efficient data queries along the time dimension, a practice common in scientific analytics but not yet supported by existing I/O techniques. In our case study with a critical climate modeling application GEOS-5, the experimental results on Jaguar supercomputer demonstrate an improvement up to 73 times for the read performance compared to the original I/O method.

Abstract It is often the case that MPI‐IO performs poorly in a Lustre file system environment, although the reasons for such performance have heretofore not been well understood. We hypothesize that such performance is a direct result of the fundamental assumptions upon which most parallel I/O optimizations are based. In particular, it is almost universally believed that parallel I/O performance is optimized when aggregator processes perform large, contiguous I/O operations in parallel. Our research, however, shows that this approach can actually provide the worst performance in a Lustre environment, and that the best performance may be obtained by performing a large number of small, non‐contiguous I/O operations. In this paper, we provide empirical results demonstrating these non‐intuitive results and explore the reasons for such unexpected performance. We present our solution to the problem, which is embodied in a user‐level library termed Y‐Lib, which redistributes the data in a way that conforms much more closely with the Lustre storage architecture than does the data redistribution pattern employed by MPI‐IO. We provide a large body of experimental results, taken across two large‐scale Lustre installations, demonstrating that Y‐Lib outperforms MPI‐IO by up to 36% on one system and 1000% on the other. We discuss the factors that impact the performance improvement obtained by Y‐Lib, which include the number of aggregator processes and Object Storage Devices, as well as the power of the system's communications infrastructure. We also show that the optimal data redistribution pattern for Y‐Lib is dependent upon these same factors. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

It is widely known that MPI-IO performs poorly in a Lustre file system environment, although the reasons for such performance are currently not well understood. The research presented in this paper strongly supports our hypothesis that MPI-IO performs poorly in this environment because of the fundamental assumptions upon which most parallel I/O optimizations are based. In particular, it is almost universally believed that parallel I/O performance is optimized when aggregator processes perform large, contiguous I/O operations in parallel. Our research shows that this approach generally provides the worst performance in a Lustre environment, and that the best performance is often obtained when the aggregator processes perform a large number of small, non-contiguous I/O operations.

Lustre is becoming an increasingly important file system for large-scale computing clusters. The problem, however, is that many data-intensive applications use MPI-IO for their I/O requirements, and MPI-IO performs poorly in a Lustre file system environment. While this poor performance has been well documented, the reasons for such performance are currently not well understood. Our research suggests that the primary performance issues have to do with the assumptions underpinning most of the parallel I/O optimizations implemented in MPI-IO, which do not appear to hold in a Lustre environment. Perhaps the most important assumption is that optimal performance is obtained by performing large, contiguous I/O operations. However, the research results presented in this poster show that this is often the worst approach to take in a Lustre file system. In fact, we found that the best performance is often achieved when each process performs a series of smaller, non-contiguous I/O requests. In this poster, we provide experimental results supporting these non-intuitive ideas, and provide alternative approaches that significantly enhance the performance of MPI-IO in a Lustre file system.