Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erich Gstrein

dblp:55/7361 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics
fraud detection
0.312018
EVA: Visual Analytics to Identify Fraudulent Events · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018
Visualization and visual analytics
visual analytics
0.312018
EVA: Visual Analytics to Identify Fraudulent Events · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data mining · 0.3customer profile analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 NEVA: Visual Analytics to Identify Fraudulent Networks
abstract
Trust-ability, reputation, security and quality are the main concerns for public and private financial institutions. To detect fraudulent behaviour, several techniques are applied pursuing different goals. For well-defined problems, analytical methods are applicable to examine the history of customer transactions. However, fraudulent behaviour is constantly changing, which results in ill-defined problems. Furthermore, analysing the behaviour of individual customers is not sufficient to detect more complex structures such as networks of fraudulent actors. We propose NEVA (Network dEtection with Visual Analytics), a Visual Analytics exploration environment to support the analysis of customer networks in order to reduce false-negative and false-positive alarms of frauds. Multiple coordinated views allow for exploring complex relations and dependencies of the data. A guidance-enriched component for network pattern generation, detection and filtering support exploring and analysing the relationships of nodes on different levels of complexity. In six expert interviews, we illustrate the applicability and usability of NEVA.
Roger A. Leite, Theresia Gschwandtner, Silvia Miksch, Erich Gstrein, Johannes Kuntner
Comput. Graph. Forum4
2018 EVA: Visual Analytics to Identify Fraudulent Events
abstract
Financial institutions are interested in ensuring security and quality for their customers. Banks, for instance, need to identify and stop harmful transactions in a timely manner. In order to detect fraudulent operations, data mining techniques and customer profile analysis are commonly used. However, these approaches are not supported by Visual Analytics techniques yet. Visual Analytics techniques have potential to considerably enhance the knowledge discovery process and increase the detection and prediction accuracy of financial fraud detection systems. Thus, we propose EVA, a Visual Analytics approach for supporting fraud investigation, fine-tuning fraud detection algorithms, and thus, reducing false positive alarms.
Roger A. Leite, Theresia Gschwandtner, Silvia Miksch, Simone Kriglstein, Margit Pohl, Erich Gstrein, Johannes Kuntner
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.6
2018 Visual analytics for event detection: Focusing on fraud
abstract
The detection of anomalous events in huge amounts of data is sought in many domains. For instance, in the context of financial data, the detection of suspicious events is a prerequisite to identify and prevent attempts to defraud. Hence, various financial fraud detection approaches have started to exploit Visual Analytics techniques. However, there is no study available giving a systematic outline of the different approaches in this field to understand common strategies but also differences. Thus, we present a survey of existing approaches of visual fraud detection in order to classify different tasks and solutions, to identify and to propose further research opportunities. In this work, fraud detection solutions are explored through five main domains: banks, the stock market, telecommunication companies, insurance companies, and internal frauds. The selected domains explored in this survey were chosen for sharing similar time-oriented and multivariate data characteristics. In this survey, we (1) analyze the current state of the art in this field; (2) define a categorization scheme covering different application domains, visualization methods, interaction techniques, and analytical methods which are used in the context of fraud detection; (3) describe and discuss each approach according to the proposed scheme; and (4) identify challenges and future research topics.
Roger A. Leite, Theresia Gschwandtner, Silvia Miksch, Erich Gstrein, Johannes Kuntner
Vis. Informatics4
2009 Adaptive Mind Agent
Brigitte Krenn, Marcin Skowron, Gregor Sieber, Erich Gstrein, Jörg Irran
IVA4