Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Umut Uludag

dblp:55/802 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Biometric security · 83% Digital forensics and information hiding · 13% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 4%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Face, body and person analysis · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition
0.112005
Large-Scale Evaluation of Multimodal Biometric Authentication Using State-of-the-Art Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition
0.112005
Large-Scale Evaluation of Multimodal Biometric Authentication Using State-of-the-Art Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005
Biometric security › multimodal biometric recognition
multimodal biometric authentication
0.112005
Large-Scale Evaluation of Multimodal Biometric Authentication Using State-of-the-Art Systems · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2005
Biometric security
biometric authentication
0.012004
Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004
Biometric security › biometric template protection
biometric key binding
0.012004
Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004
Biometric security › biometric template protection
biometric key generation
0.012004
Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking
0.012003
Hiding Biometric Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key management
0.012004
Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges · Proc. IEEE 2004
Biometric security
biometric template protection
0.012003
Hiding Biometric Data · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score normalization · 0.1score fusion · 0.1fingerprint biometric · 0.0cryptographic key binding · 0.0image-adaptive data embedding · 0.0amplitude modulation watermarking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Dynamic and static feature fusion for increased accuracy in signature verification
Mustafa Semih Sadak, Nihan Kahraman, Umut Uludag
Signal Process. Image Commun.3
2017 Biometric Layering with Fingerprints: Template Security and Privacy Through Multi-Biometric Template Fusion
abstract
As biometric applications are gaining popularity, there is increased concern over the loss of privacy and potential misuse of biometric data held in central repositories. We present a biometric authentication framework that constructs a multi-biometric template by layering multiple biometrics of a user, such that it is difficult to separate the individual layers. Thus, the framework uses the biometrics of the user to conceal them among one another. The resulting biometric template is also cancelable if the system is implemented with cancelable biometrics, such as voice. We present a realization of this idea combining two or three different fingerprints of the user, using four different methods of template construction. Three of the methods use less and less information of the constituent biometrics, so as to lower the risk of leakage and cross-link rates. Results are evaluated on publicly available Finger Verification Championship (FVC) 2000, 2002 and NIST fingerprint databases. With the FVC databases, we obtain 2.1%, 3.9% and 3.4% Equal Error Rate on average using the three proposed methods, while the state-of-the-art commercial system achieves 1.9%. Furthermore, we show low cross-link rates under 63% under different scenarios, while genuine identification rates are 100%, with such a small gallery of 55 templates.
Muhammet Yildiz, Berrin A. Yanikoglu, Alisher Kholmatov, Alper Kanak, Umut Uludag
Comput. J.5
2012 Fingerprint matching utilizing non-distal phalanges
Berkay Topcu, Mehmet Kayaoglu, Merve Kilinc Yildirim, Umut Uludag
ICPR4
2005 Large-Scale Evaluation of Multimodal Biometric Authentication Using State-of-the-Art Systems
abstract
We examine the performance of multimodal biometric authentication systems using state-of-the-art Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) fingerprint and face biometric systems on a population approaching 1,000 individuals. The majority of prior studies of multimodal biometrics have been limited to relatively low accuracy non-COTS systems and populations of a few hundred users. Our work is the first to demonstrate that multimodal fingerprint and face biometric systems can achieve significant accuracy gains over either biometric alone, even when using highly accurate COTS systems on a relatively large-scale population. In addition to examining well-known multimodal methods, we introduce new methods of normalization and fusion that further improve the accuracy.
Robert Snelick, Umut Uludag, Alan Mink, Mike Indovina, Anil K. Jain 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2004 Biometric Cryptosystems: Issues and Challenges
abstract
In traditional cryptosystems, user authentication is based on possession of secret keys; the method falls apart if the keys are not kept secret (i.e., shared with non-legitimate users). Further, keys can be forgotten, lost, or stolen and, thus, cannot provide non-repudiation. Current authentication systems based on physiological and behavioral characteristics of persons (known as biometrics), such as fingerprints, inherently provide solutions to many of these problems and may replace the authentication component of traditional cryptosystems. We present various methods that monolithically bind a cryptographic key with the biometric template of a user stored in the database in such a way that the key cannot be revealed without a successful biometric authentication. We assess the performance of one of these biometric key binding/generation algorithms using the fingerprint biometric. We illustrate the challenges involved in biometric key generation primarily due to drastic acquisition variations in the representation of a biometric identifier and the imperfect nature of biometric feature extraction and matching algorithms. We elaborate on the suitability of these algorithms for digital rights management systems.
Umut Uludag, Sharath Pankanti, Salil Prabhakar, Anil K. Jain 0001
Proc. IEEE1
2004 Biometric template selection and update: a case study in fingerprints
Umut Uludag, Arun Ross, Anil K. Jain 0001
Pattern Recognit.1
2003 Multimedia content protection via biometrics-based encryption
abstract
We propose a multimedia content protection framework that is based on biometric data of the users and a layered encryption/decryption scheme. Password-only encryption schemes are vulnerable to illegal key exchange problems. By using biometric data along with hardware identifiers as keys, it is possible to alleviate fraudulent usage of protected content. A combination of symmetric and asymmetric key systems is utilized for this purpose. The computational requirements and applicability of the proposed method are addressed. The results of encryption and decryption experiments related to time measurements are included. Watermarking systems can be used to complement the proposed method to permit novel uses of protected multimedia data.
Umut Uludag, Anil K. Jain 0001
ICME1
2003 Hiding Biometric Data
abstract
With the wide spread utilization of biometric identification systems, establishing the authenticity of biometric data itself has emerged as an important research issue. The fact that biometric data is not replaceable and is not secret, combined with the existence of several types of attacks that are possible in a biometric system, make the issue of security/integrity of biometric data extremely critical. We introduce two applications of an amplitude modulation-based watermarking method, in which we hide a user's biometric data in a variety of images. This method has the ability to increase the security of both the hidden biometric data (e.g., eigen-face coefficients) and host images (e.g., fingerprints). Image adaptive data embedding methods used in our scheme lead to low visibility of the embedded signal. Feature analysis of host images guarantees high verification accuracy on watermarked (e.g., fingerprint) images.
Anil K. Jain 0001, Umut Uludag
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2002 Robust watermarking of fingerprint images
Bilge Günsel, Umut Uludag, A. Murat Tekalp
Pattern Recognit.2