Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dominic Espinosa
dblp:55/8159
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 90% Information extraction and text analysis · 10% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
surface realization |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Further Meta-Evaluation of Broad-Coverage Surface Realization · EMNLP 2010 Hypertagging: Supertagging for Surface Realization with CCG · ACL 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Further Meta-Evaluation of Broad-Coverage Surface Realization · EMNLP 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › grammar-based parsing
combinatory categorial grammar parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Hypertagging: Supertagging for Surface Realization with CCG · ACL 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supertagging · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Further Meta-Evaluation of Broad-Coverage Surface Realization
Dominic Espinosa, Rajakrishnan Rajkumar, Michael White 0001, Shoshana Berleant |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Machine learning for text selection with expressive unit-selection voicesabstractWe show that a ranking model produced by machine learning outperforms two baselines when applied to the task of selecting texts for use in creating a unit-selection synthesis voice with good domain coverage. The model learns to predict the estimated utility of an utterance based on features relating it to the utterances selected so far and a corpus of target utterances. Our analyses indicate that our discriminative approach continues to work well even though the presence of rich prosodic and nonprosodic features significantly expands the search space beyond what has previously been handled by greedy methods. Index Terms: speech synthesis, unit selection, machine learning Dominic Espinosa, Michael White 0001, Eric Fosler-Lussier, Chris Brew |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2008 | Hypertagging: Supertagging for Surface Realization with CCG
Dominic Espinosa, Michael White 0001, Dennis Mehay |
ACL | 1 |