Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dominic Espinosa

dblp:55/8159 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 90% Information extraction and text analysis · 10%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
surface realization
0.222010
Further Meta-Evaluation of Broad-Coverage Surface Realization · EMNLP 2010
Hypertagging: Supertagging for Surface Realization with CCG · ACL 2008
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation
0.012010
Further Meta-Evaluation of Broad-Coverage Surface Realization · EMNLP 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › grammar-based parsing
combinatory categorial grammar parsing
0.012008
Hypertagging: Supertagging for Surface Realization with CCG · ACL 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supertagging · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Further Meta-Evaluation of Broad-Coverage Surface Realization
Dominic Espinosa, Rajakrishnan Rajkumar, Michael White 0001, Shoshana Berleant
EMNLP1
2010 Machine learning for text selection with expressive unit-selection voices
abstract
We show that a ranking model produced by machine learning outperforms two baselines when applied to the task of selecting texts for use in creating a unit-selection synthesis voice with good domain coverage. The model learns to predict the estimated utility of an utterance based on features relating it to the utterances selected so far and a corpus of target utterances. Our analyses indicate that our discriminative approach continues to work well even though the presence of rich prosodic and nonprosodic features significantly expands the search space beyond what has previously been handled by greedy methods. Index Terms: speech synthesis, unit selection, machine learning
Dominic Espinosa, Michael White 0001, Eric Fosler-Lussier, Chris Brew
INTERSPEECH1
2008 Hypertagging: Supertagging for Surface Realization with CCG
Dominic Espinosa, Michael White 0001, Dennis Mehay
ACL1