Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Levi Boyles
dblp:56/10549
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 52% Information extraction and text analysis · 22% Optimization for machine learning · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 50% Data mining · 50% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
collapsed variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocation · KDD 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › topic model
latent dirichlet allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocation · KDD 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocation · KDD 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocation · KDD 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | The Time-Marginalized Coalescent Prior for Hierarchical Clustering · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
hierarchical clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | The Time-Marginalized Coalescent Prior for Hierarchical Clustering · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
batch size selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Statistical Tests for Optimization Efficiency · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Statistical Tests for Optimization Efficiency · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Statistical Tests for Optimization Efficiency · NIPS 2011 |
Information retrieval › document processing
document analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocation · KDD 2013 |
Data mining › text mining › topic model
interactive topic modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocation · KDD 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic variational inference · 0.3collapsed representation · 0.3marginalization · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1frequentist hypothesis test · 0.1coordinate descent · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocationabstractThere has been an explosion in the amount of digital text information available in recent years, leading to challenges of scale for traditional inference algorithms for topic models. Recent advances in stochastic variational inference algorithms for latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) have made it feasible to learn topic models on very large-scale corpora, but these methods do not currently take full advantage of the collapsed representation of the model. We propose a stochastic algorithm for collapsed variational Bayesian inference for LDA, which is simpler and more efficient than the state of the art method. In experiments on large-scale text corpora, the algorithm was found to converge faster and often to a better solution than previous methods. Human-subject experiments also demonstrated that the method can learn coherent topics in seconds on small corpora, facilitating the use of topic models in interactive document analysis software. James R. Foulds, Levi Boyles, Christopher DuBois, Padhraic Smyth, Max Welling |
KDD | 2 |
| 2012 | The Time-Marginalized Coalescent Prior for Hierarchical ClusteringabstractWe introduce a new prior for use in Nonparametric Bayesian Hierarchical Clustering. The prior is constructed by marginalizing out the time information of Kingman’s coalescent, providing a prior over tree structures which we call the Time-Marginalized Coalescent (TMC). This allows for models which factorize the tree structure and times, providing two benefits: more flexible priors may be constructed and more efficient Gibbs type inference can be used. We demonstrate this on an example model for density estimation and show the TMC achieves competitive experimental results. Levi Boyles, Max Welling |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2011 | Statistical Tests for Optimization EfficiencyabstractLearning problems such as logistic regression are typically formulated as pure optimization problems defined on some loss function. We argue that this view ignores the fact that the loss function depends on stochastically generated data which in turn determines an intrinsic scale of precision for statistical estimation. By considering the statistical properties of the update variables used during the optimization (e.g. gradients), we can construct frequentist hypothesis tests to determine the reliability of these updates. We utilize subsets of the data for computing updates, and use the hypothesis tests for determining when the batch-size needs to be increased. This provides computational benefits and avoids overfitting by stopping when the batch-size has become equal to size of the full dataset. Moreover, the proposed algorithms depend on a single interpretable parameter – the probability for an update to be in the wrong direction – which is set to a single value across all algorithms and datasets. In this paper, we illustrate these ideas on three L1 regularized coordinate algorithms: L1 -regularized L2 -loss SVMs, L1 -regularized logistic regression, and the Lasso, but we emphasize that the underlying methods are much more generally applicable. Levi Boyles, Anoop Korattikara Balan, Deva Ramanan, Max Welling |
NIPS | 1 |