Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Walker 0001
dblp:56/11088-1
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-9574-973XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 73% Graph learning · 25% Time series and sequential data · 2% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
dynamic graph learning |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Learning Dynamic Graph Embeddings With Neural Controlled Differential Equations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 Permutation Equivariant Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Dynamic Graph Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural differential equations |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Learning Dynamic Graph Embeddings With Neural Controlled Differential Equations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 Log Neural Controlled Differential Equations: The Lie Brackets Make A Difference · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
controlled differential equation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Structured Linear CDEs: Maximally Expressive and Parallel-in-Time Sequence Models · NeurIPS 2025 Log Neural Controlled Differential Equations: The Lie Brackets Make A Difference · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Structured Linear CDEs: Maximally Expressive and Parallel-in-Time Sequence Models · NeurIPS 2025 Theoretical Foundations of Deep Selective State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Structured Linear CDEs: Maximally Expressive and Parallel-in-Time Sequence Models · NeurIPS 2025 Log Neural Controlled Differential Equations: The Lie Brackets Make A Difference · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural controlled differential equations |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Permutation Equivariant Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Dynamic Graph Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Theoretical Foundations of Deep Selective State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › state space model
selective state space model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Theoretical Foundations of Deep Selective State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
multivariate time series |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Log Neural Controlled Differential Equations: The Lie Brackets Make A Difference · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rough path theory · 1.5neural controlled differential equations · 1.0graph neural network · 1.0walsh-hadamard transform · 0.9permutation equivariance · 0.9graph neural CDE · 0.9block-diagonal matrix · 0.9neural rough differential equations · 0.8gating mechanism · 0.8Log-ODE method · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning Dynamic Graph Embeddings With Neural Controlled Differential EquationsabstractThis paper focuses on representation learning for dynamic graphs with temporal interactions. A fundamental issue is that both the graph structure and the nodes own their own dynamics, and their blending induces intractable complexity in the temporal evolution over graphs. Drawing inspiration from the recent progress of physical dynamic models in deep neural networks, we propose Graph Neural Controlled Differential Equations (GN-CDEs), a continuous-time framework that jointly models node embeddings and structural dynamics by incorporating a graph enhanced neural network vector field with a time-varying graph path as the control signal. Our framework exhibits several desirable characteristics, including the ability to express dynamics on evolving graphs without piecewise integration, the capability to calibrate trajectories with subsequent data, and robustness to missing observations. Empirical evaluation on a range of dynamic graph representation learning tasks demonstrates the effectiveness of our proposed approach in capturing the complex dynamics of dynamic graphs. Tiexin Qin, Benjamin Walker 0001, Terry J. Lyons, Hong Yan 0001, Haoliang Li |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2025 | Permutation Equivariant Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Dynamic Graph Representation LearningabstractDynamic graphs exhibit complex temporal dynamics due to the interplay between evolving node features and changing network structures. Recently, Graph Neural Controlled Differential Equations (Graph Neural CDEs) successfully adapted Neural CDEs from paths on Euclidean domains to paths on graph domains. Building on this foundation, we introduce \textit{Permutation Equivariant Graph Neural CDEs}, which project Graph Neural CDEs onto permutation equivariant function spaces. This significantly reduces the model's parameter count without compromising representational power, resulting in more efficient training and improved generalisation. We empirically demonstrate the advantages of our approach through experiments on simulated dynamical systems and real-world tasks, showing improved performance in both interpolation and extrapolation scenarios. Torben Berndt, Benjamin Walker 0001, Tiexin Qin, Jan Stühmer, Andrey Kormilitzin |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Structured Linear CDEs: Maximally Expressive and Parallel-in-Time Sequence ModelsabstractThis work introduces Structured Linear Controlled Differential Equations (SLiCEs), a unifying framework for sequence models with structured, input-dependent state-transition matrices that retain the maximal expressivity of dense matrices whilst being cheaper to compute. The framework encompasses existing architectures, such as input-dependent block-diagonal linear recurrent neural networks and DeltaNet's diagonal-plus-low-rank structure, as well as two novel variants based on sparsity and the Walsh-Hadamard transform. We prove that, unlike the diagonal state-transition matrices of S4D and Mamba, SLiCEs employing block-diagonal, sparse, or Walsh-Hadamard matrices match the maximal expressivity of dense matrices. Empirically, SLiCEs solve the $A_5$ state-tracking benchmark with a single layer, achieve best-in-class length generalisation on regular language tasks among parallel-in-time models, and match the performance of log neural controlled differential equations on six multivariate time-series classification datasets while cutting the average time per training step by a factor of twenty. Benjamin Walker 0001, Lingyi Yang, Nicola Muca Cirone, Cristopher Salvi, Terry J. Lyons |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Log Neural Controlled Differential Equations: The Lie Brackets Make A DifferenceabstractThe vector field of a controlled differential equation (CDE) describes the relationship between a control path and the evolution of a solution path. Neural CDEs (NCDEs) treat time series data as observations from a control path, parameterise a CDE’s vector field using a neural network, and use the solution path as a continuously evolving hidden state. As their formulation makes them robust to irregular sampling rates, NCDEs are a powerful approach for modelling real-world data. Building on neural rough differential equations (NRDEs), we introduce Log-NCDEs, a novel, effective, and efficient method for training NCDEs. The core component of Log-NCDEs is the Log-ODE method, a tool from the study of rough paths for approximating a CDE’s solution. Log-NCDEs are shown to outperform NCDEs, NRDEs, the linear recurrent unit, S5, and MAMBA on a range of multivariate time series datasets with up to $50{,}000$ observations. Benjamin Walker 0001, Andrew D. McLeod, Tiexin Qin, Yichuan Cheng, Haoliang Li, Terry J. Lyons |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Theoretical Foundations of Deep Selective State-Space ModelsabstractStructured state-space models (SSMs) are gaining popularity as effective foundational architectures for sequential data, demonstrating outstanding performance across a diverse set of domains alongside desirable scalability properties. Recent developments show that if the linear recurrence powering SSMs allows for a selectivity mechanism leveraging multiplicative interactions between inputs and hidden states (e.g. Mamba, GLA, Hawk/Griffin, HGRN2), then the resulting architecture can surpass attention-powered foundation models trained on text in both accuracy and efficiency, at scales of billion parameters. In this paper, we give theoretical grounding to the selectivity mechanism, often linked to in-context learning, using tools from Rough Path Theory. We provide a framework for the theoretical analysis of generalized selective SSMs, fully characterizing their expressive power and identifying the gating mechanism as the crucial architectural choice. Our analysis provides a closed-form description of the expressive powers of modern SSMs, such as Mamba, quantifying theoretically the drastic improvement in performance from the previous generation of models, such as S4. Our theory not only motivates the success of modern selective state-space models, but also provides a solid framework to understand the expressive power of future SSM variants. In particular, it suggests cross-channel interactions could play a vital role in future improvements. Nicola Muca Cirone, Antonio Orvieto, Benjamin Walker 0001, Cristopher Salvi, Terry J. Lyons |
NeurIPS | 3 |