Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yen-Sheng Ho

dblp:56/11471 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › model checking
bounded model checking
0.112012
Symbolic model checking on SystemC designs · DAC 2012
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification
0.112012
Symbolic model checking on SystemC designs · DAC 2012
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.112012
Symbolic model checking on SystemC designs · DAC 2012
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
symbolic model checking
0.112012
Symbolic model checking on SystemC designs · DAC 2012
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
systemc verification
0.112012
Symbolic model checking on SystemC designs · DAC 2012
Electronic design automation
system-level design
0.112012
Symbolic model checking on SystemC designs · DAC 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

induction · 0.1bounded model checking · 0.1behavioral state transition · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Property directed reachability with word-level abstraction
abstract
SAT-based Property Directed Reachability (PDR) has become the key algorithmic development for unbounded model checking of gate-level sequential circuits, but it can be inefficient when applied to word-level problems with heavy arithmetic logic. To address this issue, word-level abstraction is often performed by replacing a whole set of signals with unconstrained new primary inputs. This paper introduces PDR-WLA, a word-level abstraction-refinement algorithm integrated into a modified PDR implementation. The algorithm uses efficient refinement and re-uses reachability information across iterations of refinement. PDR-WLA was implemented in ABC and evaluated on a large set of industrial Verilog designs. Experimental results show significant speedups on hard problems compared to the original PDR and to a naive word-level abstraction-refinement method.
Yen-Sheng Ho, Alan Mishchenko, Robert K. Brayton
FMCAD1
2016 Efficient uninterpreted function abstraction and refinement for word-level model checking
abstract
Methods for word-level model checking based on purely bit-level techniques have difficulties with heavy arithmetic logic. Word-level and SMT approaches often are limited by relying on (incomplete) bounded model checking. UFAR, a hybrid word- and bit-level approach, addresses these issues, taking advantage of modern bit-level sequential techniques while heavy arithmetic logic is addressed by word-level abstraction and the use of uninterpreted function (UF) constraints. The methods and efficiency improvements developed for UFAR enabled it to prove 2422 of a set of 2492 industrial sequential model checking problems within a 1-hour limit, while a bit-level model checker super prove completed only 2115 of these within the same limit.
Yen-Sheng Ho, Pankaj Chauhan, Alan Mishchenko, Robert K. Brayton
FMCAD1
2012 Symbolic model checking on SystemC designs
abstract
SystemC is a de-facto standard for modeling system-level designs in the early design stage. Verifying SystemC designs is critical in the design process since it can avoid error propagation down to the final implementation. Recent works exploit the software model checking techniques to tackle this important issue. But they abstract away relevant semantic aspects or show limited scalability. In this paper, we devise a symbolic model checking technique using bounded model checking and induction to formally verify SystemC designs. We introduce the notions of behavioral states and transitions to guarantee the soundness of our approach. The experiments show the scalability and the efficiency of our method.
Chun-Nan Chou, Yen-Sheng Ho, Chiao Hsieh, Chung-Yang Huang
DAC2