EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
K. A. Liburdy
dblp:56/2079
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 93% Operating systems · 7% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
automated testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Issues in the Full Scale Use of Formal Methods for Automated Testing · ISSTA 1996 |
Software testing
specification-based testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Issues in the Full Scale Use of Formal Methods for Automated Testing · ISSTA 1996 |
Software testing › test generation
test suite generation |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Issues in the Full Scale Use of Formal Methods for Automated Testing · ISSTA 1996 |
Operating systems › operating system interface
POSIX |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | The Role of Testing Methodologies in Open Systems Standards: A POSIX Experience Report · ICSE 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal specification · 0.0executable test translation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Issues in the Full Scale Use of Formal Methods for Automated TestingabstractExperience from a full scale effort to apply formal methods to automated testing in the open systems software arena is described. The formal method applied in this work is based upon the Clemson Automated Testing System (CATS) which includes a formal specification language, a set of guidelines describing how to use the method effectively, and tool support capable of translating formal specifications into executable tests. This method is currently being used to develop a full scale test suite for IEEE's Ada Language Binding to POSIX. Following an overview of CATS, an experience report consisting of results, lessons learned and future directions is presented. James L. Crowley, James F. Leathrum Jr., K. A. Liburdy |
ISSTA | 3 |
| 1994 | The Role of Testing Methodologies in Open Systems Standards: A POSIX Experience Report
G. Deshmukh, R. Deshpande, James F. Leathrum Jr., K. A. Liburdy |
ICSE | 4 |
| 1993 | The Evolving Role of Testing in Open Systems StandardsabstractOpen systems standards are developed through a consensus building process for the purpose of promoting portability and interoperability of software and hardware. Clearly, the ability to achieve such goals is directly related to the ability to enforce adherence to a standard. Perhaps less obvious is the impact of developing test specifications concurrently with the development of the standards. As the standards development process matures, lessons learned through experience will likely demonstrate that both these roles of testing are crucial to the success of a standard.> James F. Leathrum Jr., K. A. Liburdy |
ITC | 2 |
| 1993 | Automated Testing of Open Software StandardsabstractThis paper illustrates the power and flexibility of a new approach to creating conformance test suites for open systems software standards such as POSIX. The approach incorporates an automated process for the generation and validation of conformance tests. The automated process has been implemented and comprises key components of the Clemson Automated Testing System (CATS). CATS is a testing facility designed to provide a life-cycle support environment for the development of conformance tests. This paper introduces the CATS facility and presents examples of its use.> James F. Leathrum Jr., K. A. Liburdy |
ITC | 2 |