Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siu-Bun F. Ho
dblp:56/2358
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Software testing · 67% Program analysis · 15% Software maintenance and evolution · 13% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing
test input generation |
0.0 | 2 | 1976 | On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976 On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data (Abstract) · ICSE 1976 |
Program analysis
symbolic execution |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976 |
Software testing
automated testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software quality assurance |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Software testing
software reliability |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Program verification
formal proof |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975 |
Software testing › test coverage
path coverage |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976 |
Software testing › test adequacy
testing criteria |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic execution · 0.0program graph analysis · 0.0automated software tools · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 | On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data (Abstract)
C. V. Ramamoorthy, Siu-Bun F. Ho, W. T. Chen |
ICSE | 2 |
| 1976 | On the Automated Generation of Program Test DataabstractSoftware validation through testing will continue to be a very important tool for ensuring correctness of large scale software systems. Automation of testing tools can greatly enhance their power and reduce testing cost. In this paper, techniques for automated test data generation are discussed. Given a program graph, a set of paths are identified to satisfy some given testing criteria. When a path or a program segment is specified, symbolic execution is used for generating input constraints which define a set of inputs for executing this path or segment. Problems encountered in symbolic execution are discussed. A new approach for resolving array reference ambiguities and a procedure for generating test inputs satisfying input constraints are proposed. References to arrays are recorded in a table. during symbolic execution and ambiguities are resolved when test data are generated to evaluate the subscript expressions. The implementation of a test data generator for Fortran programs incorporating these techniques is also described. C. V. Ramamoorthy, Siu-Bun F. Ho, W. T. Chen |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |
| 1975 | Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation SystemsabstractIn the past few years, research has been actively carried out in an attempt to improve the quality and reliability of large-scale software systems. Although progress has been made on the formal proof of program correctness, proving large-scale software systems correct by formal proof is still many years away. Automated software tools have been found to be valuable in improving software reliability and attacking the high cost of software systems. This paper attempts to describe some main features of automated software tools and some software evaluation systems that are currently available. C. V. Ramamoorthy, Siu-Bun F. Ho |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |