Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siu-Bun F. Ho

dblp:56/2358 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Software testing · 67% Program analysis · 15% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
test input generation
0.021976
On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976
On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data (Abstract) · ICSE 1976
Program analysis
symbolic execution
0.011976
On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976
Software testing
automated testing
0.011975
Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Software maintenance and evolution
software quality assurance
0.011975
Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Software testing
software reliability
0.011975
Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Program verification
formal proof
0.011975
Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Software testing › test coverage
path coverage
0.011976
On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976
Software testing › test adequacy
testing criteria
0.011976
On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic execution · 0.0program graph analysis · 0.0automated software tools · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data (Abstract)
C. V. Ramamoorthy, Siu-Bun F. Ho, W. T. Chen
ICSE2
1976 On the Automated Generation of Program Test Data
abstract
Software validation through testing will continue to be a very important tool for ensuring correctness of large scale software systems. Automation of testing tools can greatly enhance their power and reduce testing cost. In this paper, techniques for automated test data generation are discussed. Given a program graph, a set of paths are identified to satisfy some given testing criteria. When a path or a program segment is specified, symbolic execution is used for generating input constraints which define a set of inputs for executing this path or segment. Problems encountered in symbolic execution are discussed. A new approach for resolving array reference ambiguities and a procedure for generating test inputs satisfying input constraints are proposed. References to arrays are recorded in a table. during symbolic execution and ambiguities are resolved when test data are generated to evaluate the subscript expressions. The implementation of a test data generator for Fortran programs incorporating these techniques is also described.
C. V. Ramamoorthy, Siu-Bun F. Ho, W. T. Chen
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
1975 Testing Large Software with Automated Software Evaluation Systems
abstract
In the past few years, research has been actively carried out in an attempt to improve the quality and reliability of large-scale software systems. Although progress has been made on the formal proof of program correctness, proving large-scale software systems correct by formal proof is still many years away. Automated software tools have been found to be valuable in improving software reliability and attacking the high cost of software systems. This paper attempts to describe some main features of automated software tools and some software evaluation systems that are currently available.
C. V. Ramamoorthy, Siu-Bun F. Ho
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2