Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David W. Forslund

dblp:56/29 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
0000-0002-6534-3392ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 6 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Distributed systems · 53% High-performance computing · 41% Parallel and multicore computing · 6%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
distributed object systems
0.011998
TeleMed: Wide-Area, Secure, Collaborative Object Computing with Java and CORBA for Healthcare · HPDC 1998
High-performance computing
supercomputing
0.011993
Massively parallel vs. parallel vector supercomputers: a user's perspective (panel) · SC 1993
High-performance computing › supercomputer architecture
vector supercomputer
0.011993
Massively parallel vs. parallel vector supercomputers: a user's perspective (panel) · SC 1993
Medical and health informatics
telemedicine
0.011998
TeleMed: Wide-Area, Secure, Collaborative Object Computing with Java and CORBA for Healthcare · HPDC 1998
Distributed systems
middleware
0.011998
Building Distributed Systems (Panel) · OOPSLA 1998
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel architecture
massively parallel processor
0.011993
Massively parallel vs. parallel vector supercomputers: a user's perspective (panel) · SC 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

java · 0.0OMG standards · 0.0CORBA · 0.0panel discussion · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Results from Fielding of the Bio-Surveillance Analysis, Feedback, Evaluation and Response (B-SAFER) System in Albuquerque, New Mexico
David W. Forslund, Edith Umland, Judith C. Brillman, Edward Joyce, Philip Froman, Tom Burr, Stephen L. Judd, Richard Picard, Doug Wokoun, Mike Joner, C. Mack Sewell
AMIA1
2002 A Service-based Approach to Integrating Epidemiological Information in Public Health Departments
David W. Forslund, James E. George
AMIA1
2001 The Rapid Syndrome Validation Project (RSVP)
Al Zelicoff, Judith C. Brillman, David W. Forslund, James E. George, Sandra Zink, Sascha Koenig, Torsten Staab, Gary Simpson, Edith Umland, Kevin Bersell
AMIA3
2001 The Importance of Distributed, Component-Based Healthcare Information Systems: The Role of a Service-Based Architecture
abstract
The high cost of healthcare information systems (HISs) is driven by a number of factors. Proprietary systems drive the cost of interchanging data much higher than if the systems implemented standard interfaces, by not being able to leverage competitive reusable components. The HL7 data standards have been an excellent help, but provide only partial solutions, because of the normal customization that occurs at each organization. The monolithic nature of most large HISs makes it difficult for them to be best-of-breed in an area and very expensive to upgrade or replace. Service-oriented component-based technologies enable systems to be constructed of replaceable, best-of-breed components. This enables much more competition on lower-cost components, with the promise of much lower overall costs. This lower cost is driven not just by competition but also by providing a mechanism to deal with change, by replacing software parts as newer more powerful ones become available without having to replace the entire system. The value of components is not just in their modularity but also in the use of standard interfaces to facilitate interoperability. In addition, the ultimate value to the consumer of components is to enable the ad-hoc assembly of a patient's virtual medical record over the Internet across multiple healthcare organizations. This paper describes the successful implementation of standard components in an open-source system, called OpenEMed, which can be used for a variety of healthcare-related applications.
David W. Forslund, James E. George, Sascha Koenig, Torsten Staab, Mary Kratz, Robert Carter
CBMS1
2000 Federation of the Person Identification Service between enterprises
David W. Forslund, Rebecca K. Smith, Thomas C. Culpepper
AMIA1
1998 TeleMed: Evaluation of Use in Rural Telemedicine
David W. Forslund, James E. George, Eugene M. Gavrilov, Sandra Zink, Paul Zimnik
AMIA1
1998 TeleMed: Wide-Area, Secure, Collaborative Object Computing with Java and CORBA for Healthcare
abstract
Distributed computing is becoming commonplace in a variety of industries with health care being a particularly important one for society. The authors describe the development and deployment of TeleMed in a few health care domains. TeleMed is a 100% Java distributed application build on CORBA and OMG standards enabling the collaboration on the treatment of chronically ill patients in a secure manner over the Internet. These standards enable other systems to work interoperably with TeleMed[1] and provide transparent access to high performance distributed computing to the health care domain. The goal of wide scale integration of electronic medical records is a grand-challenge scale problem of global proportions with far-reaching social benefits.
David W. Forslund, James E. George, Eugene M. Gavrilov
HPDC1
1998 Building Distributed Systems (Panel)
abstract
Everyone is building a distributed systems these days, but the "how" has become a matter for religious debate and the "why" is often neglected completely.This panel brings together a variety of practitioners to explain the joys and woes of building a distributed system including: .why a distributed solution was chosen .what middleware was selected and why .what issues and gotchas reared their ugly heads and what was done about it
Doug Lea, David W. Forslund, Tom Barry, Don Vines, Rajendra K. Raj, Ashutosh Tiwary
OOPSLA2
1997 The importance of Java and CORBA in medicine
David W. Forslund, James L. Cook
AMIA1
1993 Massively parallel vs. parallel vector supercomputers: a user's perspective (panel)
abstract
No abstract available.
Gary Mountry, David H. Bailey, Eugene D. Brooks III, David W. Forslund, Robert J. Harrison, Don Eric Heller, Tom Kraay
SC4