Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yanmin Sun

dblp:56/406 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 60% Learning paradigms · 40%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting
0.112006
Boosting for Learning Multiple Classes with Imbalanced Class Distribution · ICDM 2006
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.112006
Boosting for Learning Multiple Classes with Imbalanced Class Distribution · ICDM 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › boosting
cost-sensitive boosting
0.112006
Boosting for Learning Multiple Classes with Imbalanced Class Distribution · ICDM 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.112006
Boosting for Learning Multiple Classes with Imbalanced Class Distribution · ICDM 2006
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › class imbalance
multi-class imbalanced classification
0.112006
Boosting for Learning Multiple Classes with Imbalanced Class Distribution · ICDM 2006
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning › boosting
adaboost
0.112006
Boosting an Associative Classifier · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › rule learning
associative classification
0.112006
Boosting an Associative Classifier · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning
boosting
0.112006
Boosting an Associative Classifier · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.112006
Boosting an Associative Classifier · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning
0.112006
Boosting an Associative Classifier · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

genetic algorithm · 0.1cost-sensitive learning · 0.1association rule mining · 0.1adaboost · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Classification of Imbalanced Data: a Review
abstract
Classification of data with imbalanced class distribution has encountered a significant drawback of the performance attainable by most standard classifier learning algorithms which assume a relatively balanced class distribution and equal misclassification costs. This paper provides a review of the classification of imbalanced data regarding: the application domains; the nature of the problem; the learning difficulties with standard classifier learning algorithms; the learning objectives and evaluation measures; the reported research solutions; and the class imbalance problem in the presence of multiple classes.
Yanmin Sun, Andrew K. C. Wong, Mohamed S. Kamel
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell.1
2007 Cost-sensitive boosting for classification of imbalanced data
Yanmin Sun, Mohamed S. Kamel, Andrew K. C. Wong, Yang Wang 0007
Pattern Recognit.1
2007 Generative and Discriminative Learning by CL-Net
abstract
This correspondence presents a two-stage classification learning algorithm. The first stage approximates the class-conditional distribution of a discrete space using a separate mixture model, and the second stage investigates the class posterior probabilities by training a network. The first stage explores the generative information that is inherent in each class by using the Chow-Liu (CL) method, which approximates high-dimensional probability with a tree structure, namely, a dependence tree, whereas the second stage concentrates on discriminative learning to distinguish between classes. The resulting learning algorithm integrates the advantages of both generative learning and discriminative learning. Because it uses CL dependence-tree estimation, we call our algorithm CL-Net. Empirical tests indicate that the proposed learning algorithm makes significant improvements when compared with the related classifiers that are constructed by either generative learning or discriminative learning.
Yanmin Sun, Andrew K. C. Wong, Yang Wang 0007
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B1
2006 Boosting for Learning Multiple Classes with Imbalanced Class Distribution
abstract
Classification of data with imbalanced class distribution has posed a significant drawback of the performance attainable by most standard classifier learning algorithms, which assume a relatively balanced class distribution and equal misclassification costs. This learning difficulty attracts a lot of research interests. Most efforts concentrate on bi-class problems. However, bi-class is not the only scenario where the class imbalance problem prevails. Reported solutions for bi-class applications are not applicable to multi-class problems. In this paper, we develop a cost-sensitive boosting algorithm to improve the classification performance of imbalanced data involving multiple classes. One barrier of applying the cost-sensitive boosting algorithm to the imbalanced data is that the cost matrix is often unavailable for a problem domain. To solve this problem, we apply Genetic Algorithm to search the optimum cost setup of each class. Empirical tests show that the proposed cost-sensitive boosting algorithm improves the classification performances of imbalanced data sets significantly.
Yanmin Sun, Mohamed S. Kamel, Yang Wang 0007
ICDM1
2006 Boosting an Associative Classifier
abstract
Associative classification is a new classification approach integrating association mining and classification. It becomes a significant tool for knowledge discovery and data mining. However, high-order association mining is time consuming when the number of attributes becomes large. The recent development of the AdaBoost algorithm indicates that boosting simple rules could often achieve better classification results than the use of complex rules. In view of this, we apply the AdaBoost algorithm to an associative classification system for both learning time reduction and accuracy improvement. In addition to exploring many advantages of the boosted associative classification system, this paper also proposes a new weighting strategy for voting multiple classifiers.
Yanmin Sun, Yang Wang 0007, Andrew K. C. Wong
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1