EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sarah M. N. Woolley
dblp:56/4490
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifolds · NIPS 2008 |
Mathematical optimization
experimental design |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifolds · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
receptive field modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifolds · NIPS 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tangent space uncertainty reduction · 0.2parametric submanifold modeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Designing neurophysiology experiments to optimally constrain receptive field models along parametric submanifoldsabstractSequential optimal design methods hold great promise for improving the efficiency of neurophysiology experiments. However, previous methods for optimal experimental design have incorporated only weak prior information about the underlying neural system (e.g., the sparseness or smoothness of the receptive field). Here we describe how to use stronger prior information, in the form of parametric models of the receptive field, in order to construct optimal stimuli and further improve the efficiency of our experiments. For example, if we believe that the receptive field is well-approximated by a Gabor function, then our method constructs stimuli that optimally constrain the Gabor parameters (orientation, spatial frequency, etc.) using as few experimental trials as possible. More generally, we may believe a priori that the receptive field lies near a known sub-manifold of the full parameter space; in this case, our method chooses stimuli in order to reduce the uncertainty along the tangent space of this sub-manifold as rapidly as possible. Applications to simulated and real data indicate that these methods may in many cases improve the experimental efficiency. Jeremy Lewi, Robert J. Butera, David M. Schneider, Sarah M. N. Woolley, Liam Paninski |
NIPS | 4 |