Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeth Sanocki

dblp:56/4693 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4Computer networks · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 56% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 34% Audio and music processing · 10%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Learning and educational technologies · 62% Interaction techniques and input · 19% Collaborative and social computing · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
text summarization
0.012000
Comparing presentation summaries: slides vs. reading vs. listening · CHI 2000
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia browsing
video browsing
0.012000
Browsing digital video · CHI 2000
Learning and educational technologies
distance learning
0.012000
Distance learning through distributed collaborative video viewing · CSCW 2000
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
multimedia streaming
0.011999
Time-Compression: Systems Concerns, Usage, and Benefits · CHI 1999
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video summarization
0.011999
Auto-summarization of audio-video presentations · ACM Multimedia (1) 1999
Interaction techniques and input › sensor-based interaction
video-based interaction
0.012000
Browsing digital video · CHI 2000
Audio and music processing
speech processing
0.011999
Time-Compression: Systems Concerns, Usage, and Benefits · CHI 1999
Audio and music processing › speech processing
time-compressed speech
0.011999
Time-Compression: Systems Concerns, Usage, and Benefits · CHI 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.1user evaluation · 0.1software video browsing application · 0.1comparative study · 0.1system design · 0.0lab study · 0.0segment selection · 0.0client-server system design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Comparing presentation summaries: slides vs. reading vs. listening
abstract
As more audio and video technical presentations go online, it becomes imperative to give users effective summarization and skimming tools so that they can find the presentation they want and browse through it quickly. In a previous study, we reported three automated methods for generating audio-video summaries and a user evaluation of those methods. An open question remained about how well various text/image only techniques will compare to the audio-video summarizations. This study attempts to fill that gap.
Li-wei He, Elizabeth Sanocki, Anoop Gupta, Jonathan Grudin
CHI2
2000 Browsing digital video
abstract
Video in digital format played on programmable devices presents opportunities for significantly enhancing the user's viewing experience. For example, time compression and pause removal can shorten the viewing time for a video, textual and visual indices can allow personalized navigation through the content, and random-access digital storage allows instantaneous seeks into the content. To understand user behavior when such capabilities are available, we built a software video browsing application that combines many such features. We present results from a user study where users browsed video in six different categories: classroom lectures, conference presentations, entertainment shows, news, sports, and travel. Our results show that the most frequently used features were time compression, pause removal, and navigation using shot boundaries. Also, the behavior was different depending on the content type, and we present a classification. Finally, the users found the browser to be very useful. Two main reasons were: i) the ability to save time and ii) the feeling of control over what content they watched.
Francis C. Li, Anoop Gupta, Elizabeth Sanocki, Li-wei He, Yong Rui
CHI3
2000 Distance learning through distributed collaborative video viewing
abstract
Previous research on Tutored Video Instruction (TVI) shows that learning is enhanced when small groups of students watch and discuss lecture videos together. Using specialized, high-end videoconferencing systems, these improved results have been shown to apply even when the students are in different locations (Distributed TVI, or DTVI). In this paper, we explore two issues in making DTVI-like scenarios widely supported at low cost. First, we explore design of a system that allows distributed individuals to collectively watch video using shared VCR controls such as play, pause, seek, stop. We show how such a system can be built on top of existing commercial technologies. Second, we explore the impact of four alternative discussion channels on student learning and interaction behavior. The four channels-text chat, audioconferencing, videoconferencing, and face-to-face-have differing infrastructure requirements and costs. Our lab studies show that while text chat does not work, there is no significant difference in discussion behavior and learning between audioconferencing and videoconferencing. While lab studies have their limitations and long-term field studies need to be done, the preliminary results point to a low-cost way for a DTVI-like model to be deployed widely in the very near future.
Jonathan J. Cadiz, Anand Balachandran, Elizabeth Sanocki, Anoop Gupta, Jonathan Grudin, Gavin Jancke
CSCW3
1999 Time-Compression: Systems Concerns, Usage, and Benefits
abstract
With the proliferation of online multimedia content and the popularity of multimedia streaming systems, it is increasingly useful to be able to skim and browse multimedia quickly. A key technique that enables quick browsing of multimedia is time-compression. Prior research has described how speech can be time-compressed (shortened in duration) while preserving the pitch of the audio. However, client-server systems providing this functionality have not been available.
Nosa Omoigui, Li-wei He, Anoop Gupta, Jonathan Grudin, Elizabeth Sanocki
CHI5
1999 Auto-summarization of audio-video presentations
abstract
As streaming audio-video technology becomes widespread, there is a dramatic increase in the amount of multimedia content available on the net. Users face a new challenge: How to examine large amounts of multimedia content quickly. One technique that can enable quick overview of multimedia is video summaries; that is, a shorter version assembled by picking important segments from the original.
Li-wei He, Elizabeth Sanocki, Anoop Gupta, Jonathan Grudin
ACM Multimedia (1)2
1999 Annotations for Streaming Video on the Web: System Design and Usage Studies
David Bargeron, Anoop Gupta, Jonathan Grudin, Elizabeth Sanocki
Comput. Networks4