Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert Glaubius

dblp:56/50 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Embedded and real-time systems · 58% Cloud and datacenter computing · 21% Electronic design automation · 21%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.222010
Optimizing Expected Time Utility in Cyber-Physical Systems Schedulers · RTSS 2010
Scheduling Design and Verification for Open Soft Real-Time Systems · RTSS 2008
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › scheduling
stochastic scheduling
0.112010
Optimizing Expected Time Utility in Cyber-Physical Systems Schedulers · RTSS 2010
Cloud and datacenter computing › job scheduling › economic scheduling
utility-based scheduling
0.112010
Optimizing Expected Time Utility in Cyber-Physical Systems Schedulers · RTSS 2010
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
soft real-time scheduling
0.112008
Scheduling Design and Verification for Open Soft Real-Time Systems · RTSS 2008
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical systems
0.012010
Optimizing Expected Time Utility in Cyber-Physical Systems Schedulers · RTSS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov decision process · 0.2state-space representation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Measuring optical distortion in aircraft transparencies: a fully automated system for quantitative evaluation
Michael Dixon, Robert Glaubius, Philip Freeman, Robert Pless, Michael P. Gleason, Matthew M. Thomas, William D. Smart
Mach. Vis. Appl.2
2010 Scalable Scheduling Policy Design for Open Soft Real-Time Systems
abstract
Open soft real-time systems, such as mobile robots, must respond adaptively to varying operating conditions, while balancing the need to perform multiple mission specific tasks against the requirement that those tasks complete in a timely manner. Setting and enforcing a utilization target for shared resources is a key mechanism for achieving this behavior. However, because of the uncertainty and non-preempt ability of some tasks, key assumptions of classical scheduling approaches do not hold. In previous work we presented foundational methods for generating task scheduling policies to enforce proportional resource utilization for open soft real-time systems with these properties. However, these methods scale exponentially in the number of tasks, limiting their practical applicability.In this paper, we present a novel parameterized scheduling policy that scales our technique to a much wider range of systems. These policies can represent geometric features of the scheduling policies produced by our earlier methods, but only require a number of parameters that is quadratic in the number of tasks. We provide empirical evidence that the best of these policies are competitive with exact solution methods in small problems, and significantly outperform heuristic methods in larger ones.
Robert Glaubius, Terry Tidwell, Braden Sidoti, David Pilla, Justin Meden, Christopher D. Gill, William D. Smart
IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium1
2010 Optimizing Expected Time Utility in Cyber-Physical Systems Schedulers
abstract
Abstract—Classical scheduling abstractions such as deadlines and priorities do not readily capture the complex timing semantics found in many real-time cyber-physical systems. Time utility functions provide a necessarily richer description of timing semantics, but designing utility-aware scheduling policies using them is an open research problem. In particular, scheduling design that optimizes expected utility accrual is needed for realtime cyber-physical domains. In this paper we design scheduling policies that optimize expected utility accrual for cyber-physical systems with periodic, non-preemptable tasks that run with stochastic duration. These policies are derived by solving a Markov Decision Process formulation of the scheduling problem. We use this formulation to demonstrate that our technique improves on existing heuristic utility accrual scheduling policies. I.
Terry Tidwell, Robert Glaubius, Christopher D. Gill, William D. Smart
RTSS2
2010 Real-Time Scheduling via Reinforcement Learning
Robert Glaubius, Terry Tidwell, Christopher D. Gill, William D. Smart
UAI1
2008 Scheduling for Reliable Execution in Autonomic Systems
Terry Tidwell, Robert Glaubius, Christopher D. Gill, William D. Smart
ATC2
2008 Scheduling Design and Verification for Open Soft Real-Time Systems
abstract
Open soft real-time systems, such as mobile robots, experience unpredictable interactions with their environments and yet must respond both adaptively and with reasonable temporal predictability. New scheduling approaches are needed to address the demands of such systems, in which many of the assumptions made by traditional real-time scheduling theory do not hold. In previous work we established foundations for a scheduling policy design and verification approach for open soft real-time systems, that can use different decision models, e.g., a Markov decision process (MDP), to capture the nuances of their scheduling semantics.However, several important refinements to the preliminary techniques developed in that work are needed to make the approach applicable in practice. This paper makes three main contributions to the state of the art in scheduling open soft real-time systems: (1) it defines a novel representation of the scheduling state space that is both more compact and more expressive than the model defined in our previous work; (2) it exploits regular structure of that representation to allow efficient verification of properties involving both discrete and continuous system state variables under specific scheduling policies; and (3) it removes the unnecessary use of a time horizon in our previous approach, thus allowing the more precise specification and enforcement of a wider range of scheduling policies for open soft real-time systems.
Robert Glaubius, Terry Tidwell, William D. Smart, Christopher D. Gill
RTSS1
2002 Constraint Modeling in the Context of Academic Task Assignment
Robert Glaubius, Berthe Y. Choueiry
CP1