Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ram Sewak Sharm
dblp:56/5101
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Computational complexity · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › pattern mining › itemset mining
frequent itemset mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Discovering all most specific sentences · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2003 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Discovering all most specific sentences · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2003 |
Computational complexity › counting complexity
hardness of enumeration |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Discovering all most specific sentences · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2003 |
Algorithms and data structures › combinatorial algorithms
hypergraph transversals |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Discovering all most specific sentences · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2003 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Discovering all most specific sentencesabstractData mining can be viewed, in many instances, as the task of computing a representation of a theory of a model or a database, in particular by finding a set of maximally specific sentences satisfying some property. We prove some hardness results that rule out simple approaches to solving the problem.The a priori algorithm is an algorithm that has been successfully applied to many instances of the problem. We analyze this algorithm, and prove that is optimal when the maximally specific sentences are "small". We also point out its limitations.We then present a new algorithm, the Dualize and Advance algorithm, and prove worst-case complexity bounds that are favorable in the general case. Our results use the concept of hypergraph transversals. Our analysis shows that the a priori algorithm can solve the problem of enumerating the transversals of a hypergraph, improving on previously known results in a special case. On the other hand, using results for the general case of the hypergraph transversal enumeration problem, we can show that the Dualize and Advance algorithm has worst-case running time that is sub-exponential to the output size (i.e., the number of maximally specific sentences).We further show that the problem of finding maximally specific sentences is closely related to the problem of exact learning with membership queries studied in computational learning theory. Dimitrios Gunopulos, Roni Khardon, Heikki Mannila, Sanjeev Saluja, Hannu Toivonen, Ram Sewak Sharm |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 6 |