Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aamer Mahmood

dblp:56/5401 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error detection
concurrent error detection
0.011988
Concurrent Error Detection Using Watchdog Processors - A Survey · IEEE Trans. Computers 1988
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › fault-tolerant architecture
watchdog processor
0.011988
Concurrent Error Detection Using Watchdog Processors - A Survey · IEEE Trans. Computers 1988
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error detection
control flow checking
0.011988
Concurrent Error Detection Using Watchdog Processors - A Survey · IEEE Trans. Computers 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

capability-based addressing · 0.0assertion checking · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 Concurrent Error Detection Using Watchdog Processors - A Survey
abstract
Concurrent system-level error detection techniques using a watchdog processor are surveyed. A watchdog processor is a small and simple coprocessor that detects errors by monitoring the behavior of a system. Like replication, it does not depend on any fault model for error detection. However, it requires less hardware than replication. It is shown that a large number of errors can be detected by monitoring the control flow and memory-access behavior. Two techniques for control-flow checking are discussed and compared with current error-detection techniques. A scheme for memory-access checking based on capability-based addressing is described. The design of a watchdog for performing reasonable checks on the output of a main processor by executing assertions is discussed.>
Aamer Mahmood, Edward J. McCluskey
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1985 Concurrent System-Level Error Detection Using a Watchdog Processor
Aamer Mahmood, Edward J. McCluskey, Aydin Ersoz
ITC1
1983 Concurrent Fault Detection Using a Watchdog Processor and Assertions
Aamer Mahmood, Edward J. McCluskey, David J. Lu
ITC1