Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guohua Liang

dblp:56/5830 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0001-7069-8529ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 87% Learning theory · 13%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning
bagging
0.322013
An Effective Approach for Imbalanced Classification: Unevenly Balanced Bagging · AAAI 2013
An Investigation of Sensitivity on Bagging Predictors: An Empirical Approach · AAAI 2012
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning
0.322013
An Effective Approach for Imbalanced Classification: Unevenly Balanced Bagging · AAAI 2013
An Investigation of Sensitivity on Bagging Predictors: An Empirical Approach · AAAI 2012
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
imbalanced classification
0.322013
An Effective Approach for Imbalanced Classification: Unevenly Balanced Bagging · AAAI 2013
An Investigation of Sensitivity on Bagging Predictors: An Empirical Approach · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
bagging
0.112011
An Empirical Study of Bagging Predictors for Different Learning Algorithms · AAAI 2011
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.112011
An Empirical Study of Bagging Predictors for Different Learning Algorithms · AAAI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sampling · 0.2ensemble learning · 0.2statistical analysis · 0.1graphical methods · 0.1stability decomposition · 0.1robustness decomposition · 0.1empirical study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 An Effective Approach for Imbalanced Classification: Unevenly Balanced Bagging
abstract
Learning from imbalanced data is an important problem in data mining research. Much research has addressed the problem of imbalanced data by using sampling methods to generate an equally balanced training set to improve the performance of the prediction models, but it is unclear what ratio of class distribution is best for training a prediction model. Bagging is one of the most popular and effective ensemble learning methods for improving the performance of prediction models; however, there is a major drawback on extremely imbalanced data-sets. It is unclear under which conditions bagging is outperformed by other sampling schemes in terms of imbalanced classification. These issues motivate us to propose a novel approach, unevenly balanced bagging (UBagging) to boost the performance of the prediction model for imbalanced binary classification. Our experimental results demonstrate that UBagging is effective and statistically significantly superior to single learner decision trees J48 (SingleJ48), bagging, and equally balanced bagging (BBagging) on 32 imbalanced data-sets.
Guohua Liang, Anthony G. Cohn 0001
AAAI1
2012 An Investigation of Sensitivity on Bagging Predictors: An Empirical Approach
abstract
As growing numbers of real world applications involve imbalanced class distribution or unequal costs for mis- classification errors in different classes, learning from imbalanced class distribution is considered to be one of the most challenging issues in data mining research. This study empirically investigates the sensitivity of bagging predictors with respect to 12 algorithms and 9 levels of class distribution on 14 imbalanced data-sets by using statistical and graphical methods to address the important issue of understanding the effect of vary- ing levels of class distribution on bagging predictors. The experimental results demonstrate that bagging NB and MLP are insensitive to various levels of imbalanced class distribution.
Guohua Liang
AAAI1
2012 An efficient and simple under-sampling technique for imbalanced time series classification
abstract
Imbalanced time series classification (TSC) involving many real-world applications has increasingly captured attention of researchers. Previous work has proposed an intelligent-structure preserving over-sampling method (SPO), which the authors claimed achieved better performance than other existing over-sampling and state-of-the-art methods in TSC. The main disadvantage of over-sampling methods is that they significantly increase the computational cost of training a classification model due to the addition of new minority class instances to balance data-sets with high dimensional features. These challenging issues have motivated us to find a simple and efficient solution for imbalanced TSC. Statistical tests are applied to validate our conclusions. The experimental results demonstrate that this proposed simple random under-sampling technique with SVM is efficient and can achieve results that compare favorably with the existing complicated SPO method for imbalanced TSC.
Guohua Liang, Chengqi Zhang
CIKM1
2011 An Empirical Study of Bagging Predictors for Different Learning Algorithms
abstract
Bagging is a simple yet effective design which combines multiple single learners to form an ensemble for prediction. Despite its popular usage in many real-world applications, existing research is mainly concerned with studying unstable learners as the key to ensure the performance gain of a bagging predictor, with many key factors remaining unclear. For example, it is not clear when a bagging predictor can outperform a single learner and what is the expected performance gain when different learning algorithms were used to form a bagging predictor. In this paper, we carry out comprehensive empirical studies to evaluate bagging predictors by using 12 different learning algorithms and 48 benchmark data-sets. Our analysis uses robustness and stability decompositions to characterize different learning algorithms, through which we rank all learning algorithms and comparatively study their bagging predictors to draw conclusions. Our studies assert that both stability and robustness are key requirements to ensure the high performance for building a bagging predictor. In addition, our studies demonstrated that bagging is statistically superior to most single base learners, except for KNN and Naïve Bayes (NB). Multi-layer perception (MLP), Naïve Bayes Trees (NBTree), and PART are the learning algorithms with the best bagging performance.
Guohua Liang, Xingquan Zhu 0001, Chengqi Zhang
AAAI1
2011 An Empirical Evaluation of Bagging with Different Algorithms on Imbalanced Data
Guohua Liang, Chengqi Zhang
ADMA (1)1