Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brigham S. Anderson

dblp:56/614 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 64% Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Graph learning · 5%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.122005
Fast Information Value for Graphical Models · NIPS 2005
Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.112005
Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference
0.112005
Fast Information Value for Graphical Models · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model
0.112005
Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
query selection
0.112005
Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image analysis
0.012004
Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology · KDD 2004
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
nonlinear regression
0.012004
Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology · KDD 2004
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization
0.012000
A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization · ICML 2000
Mathematical optimization › evolutionary computation
evolutionary optimization
0.012000
A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization · ICML 2000
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
noisy optimization
0.012000
A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization · ICML 2000
Data mining › pattern mining
association rule mining
0.011998
ADtrees for Fast Counting and for Fast Learning of Association Rules · KDD 1998
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
0.012005
Fast Information Value for Graphical Models · NIPS 2005
Computational science and engineering
astronomy
0.012004
Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology · KDD 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted linear regression · 0.1nearest neighbor search · 0.1eigenimages · 0.1message passing · 0.1greedy query selection · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1active learning · 0.1nonparametric optimization · 0.0ADtree · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms
abstract
Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) model sequential data in many fields such as text/speech processing and biosignal analysis. Active learning algorithms learn faster and/or better by closing the data-gathering loop, i.e., they choose the examples most informative with respect to their learning objectives. We introduce a framework and objective functions for active learning in three fundamental HMM problems: model learning, state estimation, and path estimation. In addition, we describe a new set of algorithms for efficiently finding optimal greedy queries using these objective functions. The algorithms are fast, i.e., linear in the number of time steps to select the optimal query and we present empirical results showing that these algorithms can significantly reduce the need for labelled training data.
Brigham S. Anderson
ICML1
2005 Fast Information Value for Graphical Models
abstract
Calculations that quantify the dependencies between variables are vital to many operations with graphical models, e.g., active learning and sen- sitivity analysis. Previously, pairwise information gain calculation has involved a cost quadratic in network size. In this work, we show how to perform a similar computation with cost linear in network size. The loss function that allows this is of a form amenable to computation by dynamic programming. The message-passing algorithm that results is described and empirical results demonstrate large speedups without de- crease in accuracy. In the cost-sensitive domains examined, superior ac- curacy is achieved.
Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001
NIPS1
2004 Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology
abstract
Astronomy increasingly faces the issue of massive, unwieldly data sets. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) [11] has so far generated tens of millions of images of distant galaxies, of which only a tiny fraction have been morphologically classified. Morphological classification in this context is achieved by fitting a parametric model of galaxy shape to a galaxy image. This is a nonlinear regression problem, whose challenges are threefold, 1) blurring of the image caused by atmosphere and mirror imperfections, 2) large numbers of local minima, and 3) massive data sets.Our strategy is to use the eigenimages of the parametric model to form a new feature space, and then to map both target image and the model parameters into this feature space. In this low-dimensional space we search for the best image-to-parameter match. To search the space, we sample it by creating a database of many random parameter vectors (prototypes) and mapping them into the feature space. The search problem then becomes one of finding the best prototype match, so the fitting process a nearest-neighbor search.In addition to the savings realized by decomposing the original space into an eigenspace, we can use the fact that the model is a linear sum of functions to reduce the prototypes further: the only prototypes stored are the components of the model function. A modified form of nearest neighbor is used to search among them.Additional complications arise in the form of missing data and heteroscedasticity, both of which are addressed with weighted linear regression. Compared to existing techniques, speed-ups ach-ieved are between 2 and 3 orders of magnitude. This should enable the analysis of the entire SDSS dataset.
Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001, Andrew J. Connolly, Robert Nichol
KDD1
2000 A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization
Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001, David Cohn
ICML1
1998 ADtrees for Fast Counting and for Fast Learning of Association Rules
Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001
KDD1