Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brigham S. Anderson
dblp:56/614
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 64% Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Graph learning · 5% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Fast Information Value for Graphical Models · NIPS 2005 Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Fast Information Value for Graphical Models · NIPS 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
query selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithms · ICML 2005 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology · KDD 2004 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
nonlinear regression |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology · KDD 2004 |
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization · ICML 2000 |
Mathematical optimization › evolutionary computation
evolutionary optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization · ICML 2000 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
noisy optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization · ICML 2000 |
Data mining › pattern mining
association rule mining |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | ADtrees for Fast Counting and for Fast Learning of Association Rules · KDD 1998 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Fast Information Value for Graphical Models · NIPS 2005 |
Computational science and engineering
astronomy |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphology · KDD 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted linear regression · 0.1nearest neighbor search · 0.1eigenimages · 0.1message passing · 0.1greedy query selection · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1active learning · 0.1nonparametric optimization · 0.0ADtree · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Active learning for Hidden Markov Models: objective functions and algorithmsabstractHidden Markov Models (HMMs) model sequential data in many fields such as text/speech processing and biosignal analysis. Active learning algorithms learn faster and/or better by closing the data-gathering loop, i.e., they choose the examples most informative with respect to their learning objectives. We introduce a framework and objective functions for active learning in three fundamental HMM problems: model learning, state estimation, and path estimation. In addition, we describe a new set of algorithms for efficiently finding optimal greedy queries using these objective functions. The algorithms are fast, i.e., linear in the number of time steps to select the optimal query and we present empirical results showing that these algorithms can significantly reduce the need for labelled training data. Brigham S. Anderson |
ICML | 1 |
| 2005 | Fast Information Value for Graphical ModelsabstractCalculations that quantify the dependencies between variables are vital to many operations with graphical models, e.g., active learning and sen- sitivity analysis. Previously, pairwise information gain calculation has involved a cost quadratic in network size. In this work, we show how to perform a similar computation with cost linear in network size. The loss function that allows this is of a form amenable to computation by dynamic programming. The message-passing algorithm that results is described and empirical results demonstrate large speedups without de- crease in accuracy. In the cost-sensitive domains examined, superior ac- curacy is achieved. Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001 |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2004 | Fast nonlinear regression via eigenimages applied to galactic morphologyabstractAstronomy increasingly faces the issue of massive, unwieldly data sets. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) [11] has so far generated tens of millions of images of distant galaxies, of which only a tiny fraction have been morphologically classified. Morphological classification in this context is achieved by fitting a parametric model of galaxy shape to a galaxy image. This is a nonlinear regression problem, whose challenges are threefold, 1) blurring of the image caused by atmosphere and mirror imperfections, 2) large numbers of local minima, and 3) massive data sets.Our strategy is to use the eigenimages of the parametric model to form a new feature space, and then to map both target image and the model parameters into this feature space. In this low-dimensional space we search for the best image-to-parameter match. To search the space, we sample it by creating a database of many random parameter vectors (prototypes) and mapping them into the feature space. The search problem then becomes one of finding the best prototype match, so the fitting process a nearest-neighbor search.In addition to the savings realized by decomposing the original space into an eigenspace, we can use the fact that the model is a linear sum of functions to reduce the prototypes further: the only prototypes stored are the components of the model function. A modified form of nearest neighbor is used to search among them.Additional complications arise in the form of missing data and heteroscedasticity, both of which are addressed with weighted linear regression. Compared to existing techniques, speed-ups ach-ieved are between 2 and 3 orders of magnitude. This should enable the analysis of the entire SDSS dataset. Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001, Andrew J. Connolly, Robert Nichol |
KDD | 1 |
| 2000 | A Nonparametric Approach to Noisy and Costly Optimization
Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001, David Cohn |
ICML | 1 |
| 1998 | ADtrees for Fast Counting and for Fast Learning of Association Rules
Brigham S. Anderson, Andrew W. Moore 0001 |
KDD | 1 |