Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Heather Simpson

dblp:56/6376 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 67% Information extraction and text analysis · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning
0.512021
Categorization of Financial Transactions in QuickBooks · KDD 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
personalized classifier
0.512021
Categorization of Financial Transactions in QuickBooks · KDD 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.512021
Categorization of Financial Transactions in QuickBooks · KDD 2021
Recommender systems › online recommendation
real-time recommendation
0.112021
Categorization of Financial Transactions in QuickBooks · KDD 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer learning · 1.0few-shot learning · 1.0deep neural network · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Categorization of Financial Transactions in QuickBooks
abstract
This paper shares our work on building a machine learning system to categorize transactions for Intuit's QuickBooks product. Transaction categorization is challenging due to the complexity of accounting, the need for personalization, and the diversity of customers. We have broken down this monolithic problem into smaller pieces based on customers' life-cycle stages, and tailored solutions to address customer pain-points for each. Modern machine learning technologies such as deep neural networks, transfer learning, and few-shot learning are adopted to enable accurate transaction categorization. Furthermore our system learns user actions in real-time to provide relevant and in-time category recommendations. This in-session learning capability reduces user workload, improves customer experience, and helps to cultivate confidence.
Heather Simpson, Jocelyn Lu, Nhung Ho
KDD4
2010 An Evaluation of Technologies for Knowledge Base Population
Paul McNamee, Hoa Trang Dang, Heather Simpson, Patrick Schone, Stephanie M. Strassel
LREC3
2010 Wikipedia and the Web of Confusable Entities: Experience from Entity Linking Query Creation for TAC 2009 Knowledge Base Population
Heather Simpson, Stephanie M. Strassel, Robert Parker, Paul McNamee
LREC1
2010 The DARPA Machine Reading Program - Encouraging Linguistic and Reasoning Research with a Series of Reading Tasks
Stephanie M. Strassel, Dan Adams, Henry Goldberg, Jonathan Herr, Ron Keesing, Daniel Oblinger, Heather Simpson, Robert Schrag, Jonathan Wright
LREC7
2007 Inclusive interface design for seniors: Image-browsing for a health information context
abstract
Abstract This study explores an image‐based retrieval interface for drug information, focusing on usability for a specific population—seniors. Qualitative, task‐based interviews examined participants' health information behaviors and documented search strategies using an existing database ( www.drugs.com ) and a new prototype that uses similarity‐based clustering of pill images for retrieval. Twelve participants (aged 65 and older), reflecting a diversity of backgrounds and experience with Web‐based resources, located pill information using the interfaces and discussed navigational and other search preferences. Findings point to design features (e.g., image enlargement) that meet seniors' needs in the context of other health‐related information‐seeking strategies (e.g., contacting pharmacists).
Lisa M. Given, Stan Ruecker, Heather Simpson, Elizabeth (Bess) Sadler, Andrea Ruskin
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.3