Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henry de Plinval

dblp:56/9966 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
0000-0002-3449-0816ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 65% Robot navigation and mapping · 20% Legged, aerial and field robots · 15%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › constrained control
output constraint
0.212013
Keeping a ground point in the camera field of view of a landing UAV · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual navigation
vision-based landing
0.212013
Keeping a ground point in the camera field of view of a landing UAV · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › sensor-based control › visual servoing
homography-based visual servoing
0.112011
Visual servoing for underactuated VTOL UAVs: A linear, Homography-Based Approach · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112011
Visual servoing for underactuated VTOL UAVs: A linear, Homography-Based Approach · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › sensor-based control
visual servoing
0.112011
Visual servoing for underactuated VTOL UAVs: A linear, Homography-Based Approach · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
unmanned aerial vehicle
0.012013
Keeping a ground point in the camera field of view of a landing UAV · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.012011
Visual servoing for underactuated VTOL UAVs: A linear, Homography-Based Approach · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robot control
VTOL UAV control
0.012011
Visual servoing for underactuated VTOL UAVs: A linear, Homography-Based Approach · ICRA 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual servoing · 0.2nonlinear control · 0.2homography estimation · 0.1feedback linearization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Keeping a ground point in the camera field of view of a landing UAV
abstract
This paper proposes a key feature for vision based automatic landing of a UAV: the addition to a given control law of the constraint that a given ground point be maintained in the camera field of view (FoV). This feature is an application case of an output constraint method recently developed and available for any nonlinear system. This method is based on an observation made for relative degree one systems, and extended iteratively to any nonlinear system. The landing aircraft application case considered in this article consists of the design of a control law for an aircraft to maintain a given ground point in the camera field of view for visual servoing purpose. Simulation results confirm the effectiveness of the approach.
Laurent Burlion, Henry de Plinval
ICRA2
2011 Visual servoing for underactuated VTOL UAVs: A linear, Homography-Based Approach
abstract
The paper addresses the control of Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) Underactuated Autonomous Vehicles (UAVs) in hover flight, based on measurements provided by an on-board video camera and rate gyros. The objective is to stabilize the vehicle to the pose associated with a visual image of a planar target. By using the homography matrix computed from the camera measurements of the target, stabilizing feedback laws are derived. Explicit stability conditions on the control parameters are provided. It is shown that very good robustness and performance can be achieved without any apriori information on the visual target (like geometry, or orientation), by a proper tuning of the control parameters. Simulation results confirm the effectiveness of the approach.
Henry de Plinval, Pascal Morin, Philippe Mouyon, Tarek Hamel
ICRA1